Anybody commenting on the current paint scheme may care to reflect on the the late 1960’s attempt, whilst on the Turnhouse gate.
Only one?..difficult!
I was going through a similar thought process last year….the Fuji is a fine bit of kit, beautifully designed and very compact………….but………..I went for the Canon 300D in the end, and haven’t regretted it.
I bumped into a colleague from work at Legends, who was using a Fuji for the first time and he was finding the shutter lag frustrating (lots of pics of tails flashing past!)
Never had the pleasure, but always looks impesssive going past.
Did I click a cliquer clicking?
I knew there was something that made us different to BRS in terms of the type of a/c the runway could handle.
How is 14 for obstacles? Is that the one with the chevin in the way?
14 at LBA is not obstacle limited…..trouble is, the prevailing wind at LBA tends to favour 32. Given light winds, take off performance from 14 with a very light tailwind will probably allow higher take off weight than a 32 departure.
Bristol is 2011m long, LBA is 2250m
You are, perhaps, making the mistake of assuming that runway length is the ONLY thing that determines take off performance. Yes, it is important, but you also must assure OBSTACLE clearance in the event of an engine failure after V1. 32 at LBA is very definitely obstactle limited. An increase in runway length would, however, help…..using a technique called (by Mr. Boeing) Improved Climb, you can use excess runway length to acclerate to a higher than normal take off speed (and higher than normal V2) to improve your initial climb gradient, and therefore improve obstacle clearance.
Take it thats LBA? ;).
Couldn’t possibly comment!
Moondance/wysiwyg,
Do you mostly “hand-fly” the initial part of the SID/Departure Route or do you try and stick the AP on as soon as possible?
Bit of a off-topic question but just interested to know. 🙂
Regards
Flex 35
Difficult to generalise, but typically most folks tend to hand fly until after flap retraction. Depends on circumstances…flying a familiar SID at a quiet time of day is a good time for some manual flying. Equally, departing somewhere unfamiliar at 0300 with thunderstorms flashing away, far, far safer to enagage the AP ASAP….all down to common sense basically.
When do pilots get to practice raw data flights? :confused:
Is it still done in the Sim, or not fully to the same extent as once done?
Training philosophy these days is to operate the sim exactly as you would the real aircraft on the line. There are certain failures that are practised on the sim that require raw data flying eg failures that turn EFIS into dead, blank, black CRTs leaving only standby instruments….no brownie points for being a hero and hand flying with raw data when an autopilot and FMC available. Just about the only thing required that is required to be hand flown on the sim is an ILS with engine failed.
On what used to be called the Instrument Rating on the sim (which is now called a Licence Proficiency Check or LPC…don’t you just love Euro-speak) we are now encouraged to use the Flight Management Computer and all the navigation modes (LNAV for navigation and holding for example) to maximum extent – i.e. make it as realistic as possible.
In years gone by, you were expected to fly an FMC/EFIS equipped heavy jet manually on a short route (on the sim), with only the Flight Director for guidance…holds had to be manually flown using raw data. This was clearly unrealistic, so the current approach is to operate the aircraft exactly as you would in the real world…suits me!
Those sort of landings are probably second nature to an experienced flight crew
True enough, but an approach onto the 6000ft rollercoaster of a runway that is West Yorkshire International Airport with the standard 30kt crosswind can be a sphincter clenching experience.
Actually a widebody in a crosswind tends to a far better ride than lighter aircraft. The sheer mass and inertia makes the machine less affected by the gusty conditions…still an impressive pic though.
A few made it through the murk to Derby…departing for Hucknall on Sunday morning. The Dragon didn’t nightstop, but made a fine flypast.
Not to stray off topic too far, but Derby is a dump
On the face of it, Derby may not appear as attractive as Nottingham, but I find few UK cities as threatening as Nottingham. Its a good looking city, fine shops, great concert venues, but for some reason Nottingham seems to attract vagrants and junkies in huge numbers, continually hassling and begging…spent an entertaining time last year, locked inside my car, waiting to pick up son number 1 from a concert at Rock City watching the drug deals very openly going on in front of me.
And vaguely back on topic, always thought Coventry = EGBE = Birmingham East. As for EMA, what about Kegworth International, should stop all the local bickering!
Nice pics, awful colours!