dark light

Grim901

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 975 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2411008
    Grim901
    Participant

    If we have any extra. We might need them.

    Fair enough, I didn’t realise it was just a SLEP, I thought they were going for a full re-manufacture which would have meant a production line (like the Nimrod MRA4 was meant to have) that could roll out as many as needed.

    Grim901
    Participant

    Great info madrat, thank you!

    Lot’sa fighters and strike capability

    There is serious expeditionary capability listed as well. #’s of tankers, EW support, etc.

    In my hometown, here in the US, we have a German manufacturing plant and a French plant as well. As I speak with my European friends about contingencies (Iranian nuclear ambitions, China arming to the teeth) and hostilities (war on terror), you would think that Europe was disarmed. I keep pointing out the #’s of Typhoons, Rafales, Tornadoes, etc. And this is just the EU Air Forces. In heavy fighters alone, Madrat had about 1500 fighters. They all seem to perform very well on deployed excercises around the globe, which speaks of training.

    Nuclear capabilities, a few emerging carriers, seems pretty damn strong.

    Perhaps when you look at Madrat’s figures it is easy to forget that Europe is not one nation. Each nation will only deploy a part of its fighters (if any at all, certain European countries have the annoying habit of not fighting when others are) which means of those thousands of fighters only a few can be deployed at once and is entirely dependent on each individual nation.

    You want a strong “EU” force deployed, you have to convince the British and the French to fight (usually the most willing deploy and the 2 largest military forces and the only to be able to carry out the full spectrum of operations), then the small scrappy nations (Denmark and Estonia for example), then you have to drag others in who either can’t or won’t deploy much (Italy, Germany being 2 of the more obvious won’t’s, although the Germans have been trying harder recently). Even after all that you still have a country or 2 in the EU that would rather annoy all the big nations that also happen to be their neighbours rather than lose their neutrality (yes Ireland i’m looking at you).

    In short, you asked the Eu to fight tomorrow and you’d not get the response you need unless someone is actually rolling tanks into the Rhineland. Integration won’t change that because they have to go out of the way to satisfy the neutral countries and those who don’t want to fight.

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2411128
    Grim901
    Participant

    All sorts of options for MASC were studied pre-02 downselect. The ‘cheapo’ one was to buy the best ten or so S-3B’s out of AMARC, regenerate them, and have Thales adapt them for Searchwater.

    Personally, for one duty carrier, I doubt we’d go to the expense of bringing in a dedicated COD capability. I could be wrong here but I dont think that the Aeronavale have done either. Cheaper to pay the Yanks for ‘courier services’ on an, as necessary, basis if they have a C-2 near where we are operating I would have thought.

    Besides you dont need CATOBAR to operate a twin turboprop radar platform from a carrier. I believe Mantis (twin turboprop) could be converted quite successfully to lift a Searchwater array. With 9000kg of payload capability I could even envisage a non-radar equipped model doing a fair job of delivering the mail and any small-scale stores necessary!.

    Aren’t the Americans planning to re-manufacture their C2’s or replace them? Wouldn’t it be easiest to simply buy a couple of theirs off the shelf?

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2028312
    Grim901
    Participant

    Whatever they are, that forward-most one is right in the Phalanx’s field of fire.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2028319
    Grim901
    Participant

    Artisan is a pretty capable radar in its own right. Technology-wise it may actually be more advanced than the SAMPSON, since it utilizes elements from a couple of other radar programmes, and it’s designed more as a multi-role radar. On the T26s it’ll serve as both air and volume search radar, and it can also perform air traffic control, useful for a carrier.
    http://www.science.mod.uk/codex/issue2/news/news5.aspx

    What exactly are those metal cables jutting out of the sides of the deck? I’ve seen them on pretty much all modern CATOBAR and STOBAR carrier designs. I initially thought they were related to the arrested recovery system, but that probably isn’t the case.

    They are future proofing. When the oil runs out those metal cables can be lowered into the water to propel the vessel forward. I believe the correct nautical term is “oars”. 😛

    in reply to: Saudi air attacks on Yemen #2418803
    Grim901
    Participant

    I assume the Tornadoes were sold to Saudi with the knowledge that someday, they might need to drop bombs. Not for air shows. So whats the complaint about?

    The Guardian is one of Britain’s more liberal, peace oriented papers – lets use the terms foolish idiots/hippies for now. They rarely accept how the world actually works. In their mind war is bad, therefore we don’t need to go to war, therefore we don’t need a military.

    in reply to: Saudi air attacks on Yemen #2418993
    Grim901
    Participant

    On a related subject, this just popped up on the BBC:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11098040

    My guess would be Special Forces again.

    in reply to: Saudi air attacks on Yemen #2419119
    Grim901
    Participant

    The British were involved in that civil war as well, they sent the SAS in as “trainers”.

    But yes it was all done in cooperation.

    And it doesn’t really matter if our jets were used or not, if we stopped selling them the only outcome would be fewer British jobs and more US jobs when the Saudis buy more F15’s instead.

    in reply to: A400M Flies #2419374
    Grim901
    Participant

    The unpaved runways requirement is unnecessary for nations that are only looking for use on their own territory rather than Afghanistan-like operations. As for cargo loading, isn’t the MRTT supposed to accept military pallets?

    Pallets yes, because they can be loaded as civilian baggage and food etc is loaded onto civvie aircraft, into the hold below the passenger deck. Vehicles and other cargo that could easily be loaded onto a Herc or A400 using the ramp is a lot harder though/impossible depending on size.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon crash 24/08/10 #2419479
    Grim901
    Participant

    Very sad times and a great loss of a great pilot I’m sure.

    It depends on what caused the accident, something wrong with the airplane or pilot error, no matter what caused it it shouldn’t be used against export potential just because the pilot was sadly killed, it wouldn’t show much respect to him or the family & friends.

    But sadly these days, if a company can exploit whats happened to make money then they’ll do it.

    Do any of the planes that the Typhoon competes with in export orders have a better record?

    From what I can remember the Rafale has had a fatal crash, as has the F22. What about the F18, Gripen, Mig 35 etc?

    It shouldn’t affect exports though unless a fundamental flaw with the plane is found, which is unlikely since only 2 have crashed in the life of the plane. What was the cause of the other crash?

    in reply to: A400M Flies #2419611
    Grim901
    Participant

    I’ve been looking up the Airbus A330 MRTT, and it appears it can carry 45 tonnes of cargo in addition to it’s full fuel load. Doesn’t that already fill the A400M’s niche? Countries seeking smaller orders can just take the MRTT and attain a dual-purpose platform.

    If modified civvie craft could do the job there’d never have been a need for the Hercules or any other smaller military cargo aircraft either.

    The A330 would have passenger doors and those that a passenger plane would have for loading suitcases etc. – Not the most useful thing when you’re trying to load vehicles. Nor would it have any way of parachuting supplies in, or landing on anything but concrete. The list goes on…

    in reply to: Saudi air attacks on Yemen #2419615
    Grim901
    Participant

    The Saudis were bombing rebel positions in Yemen earlier in the year, after a long period of those rebels (with Al Qaeda links) attacking both the Yemen govt. and Saudi Arabia (parts of which they claim as their own). I don’t think it is still going on.

    The only reports and pictures I saw were of F15’s being used. Didn’t see anything about Tornados at the time.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon crash 24/08/10 #2419618
    Grim901
    Participant

    Any indications as to cause?

    in reply to: SBADS system #2028451
    Grim901
    Participant

    Would it be anything to do with the Hercules taking over SAR duties after the retirement of the Nimrod MR2?

    Possible but unlikely. I would have guessed more along Distiller’s lines.

    For special forces games. Dropping people and such a boat over international waters, behind the horizon. Question is how they get back …

    There have been a few special forces operations where they would come in by air/sea, and leave by a different route, depending on the scenario. In the Falklands there was a plan to drop the SAS in Argentina using Sea Kings going under radar, then the SAS leaving on foot into Chile.

    in reply to: UK to ditch F35B for Super Hornet? #2420325
    Grim901
    Participant

    Drivel from the mouth of a politician who avoids criticizing his superiors…

    When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
    Whan all you have is fast jets, every problem requires a fast jet. :rolleyes:

    Anybody capable of critical thinking knows better than that…

    Fast jets do not have the persistence or sensors to fight Terry Taliban. The only kills they achieve is if they are summoned by ground forces who are already in contact – played out time and time again in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    But, Reapers and Predators are not the answer because their propellers are too noisy. Terry Taliban can hear them as they approach and he seeks cover until they are gone.

    A COIN system needs both persistence and the ability to operate at sufficient altitude to be undetectable by ears and eyes on the ground.

    Sounds like the next generation of UCAVs to come online (X47, Taranis etc) will meet those criteria.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 975 total)