dark light

mikeconnell

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 156 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whats different about this picture #668349
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Re: The Answer!

    Originally posted by Bmused55
    Ok time to put you all out of your misery.

    Neither of them are airliners.
    They are both infact 3.8m long (3.7m wingspan) Gas turbine powered model aircraft in 1:16 scale.

    Not your average Herpa wings model is it lads! LMAO!

    US Airways A330: http://www.michel-concorde.com/airbus/a330/usairways/index.html

    Thai A330: http://www.michel-concorde.com/airbus/a330/thaiairways/index.html

    Was I just in time? (see my post 2 above and 3 mins before yours!)

    Is there a prize?

    Mike

    in reply to: Whats different about this picture #668382
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Are these real aircraft or models?

    Mike

    in reply to: Whats different about this picture #668398
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Is it something to do with the fuselage, the wings, the tail , the flight deck, the engines, the engine pylons, the winglets, the windows, the doors, the landing gear, the tyres, the fuel tanks, the avionics, the flight crew, the sky, the tyres, the airlines, the cabin crew, the passengers, the airlerons, the elevators, the flaps, the rudder, the pitot tubes, the apu, the the landing lights, the registrations, the aircraft attitude, the airspeed, or anything else to do with the aircraft?

    ๐Ÿ˜€

    Mike

    in reply to: What would you (not) like to fly in? #668410
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by MINIDOH
    Mikeconnell, if an aircraft is dirty and that makes it not airworthy then surely they should clean it. Im not prepared to go into the detail of actually how bad the aircraft was, but take my word for it, it was bad.

    I don’t think you quite got the point of my post. I was saying that you can not tell a plane’s airworthyness by its looks. We can take it that Air France’s ships are the most airworthy in the sky (along with pretty well all other US / Western European / First World Asian / Australian majors) – the dirty exterior does not change that – while an airplane that is missing a major component is not made airworthy by a fresh coat of paint.

    Mike

    in reply to: What would you (not) like to fly in? #669306
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    I won’t fly Ryanair again either, but not because of any safety concern – I believe them to be as safe as most carriers.

    It’s more because of their customer service or lack of it.

    Someone mentioned looking airworthy. How would you tell from looking? The reason I ask is that AF’s aircraft are often filthy from the outside, but I think we can take it for granted that AF maintain their aircraft to 110% flightworthyness.

    At the same time a less-reputable airline could have a plane fresh from the paint shop with (say) part of the landing gear missing if its exam wasn’t done properly.

    Just a few thoughts.

    Mike

    in reply to: Finally, a Grand #671290
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by Airline owner
    I thought this war was between Airbus and Boeing so leave the much missed concorde out of this please:o ๐Ÿ˜ฎ ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    But isn’t Concorde an Airbus? It’s as much so as the 717 is a Boeing or the 146 a BAe aircraft.

    ๐Ÿ˜€

    (Retreats to a safe distance)

    Mike

    in reply to: Back from hell: UAL 744s #672362
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by Wrenchbender
    I hope the maintenance is better on the United 747’s than the
    A-320’s. United sends their planes out to 3rd party chop shops and they put the gear in wrong. It worked a few times and then it turned 90 degrees. The plane landed like this. I could have killed everyone. I heard of engines failing also.

    Hope you’re not about to start posting these photos on every United-related thread that appears from now on. Everyone has their axe to grind, but you’ve already made your point.

    Regards
    Mike

    in reply to: Back from hell: UAL 744s #677792
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by greekdude1
    Mike, I have to disagree here. I’ve been premier or premier executive on UA since the end of 1999 so I’ve sat no further aft than row 35 on a UA 744, ever. Row 32-34 can’t be any more cramped than the rest of the Y-class cabin, per se. My favourite seat on UA’s 744’s is actually 35C or 35H because you have the overwing exit row in front of you and unlimited legroom, so I just stretch my legs out all the way and go to sleep and have the toilet literally right next to me. However when those 2 seats aren’t available, I sit in the 3 rows in front of that which are the aforementioned rows. If anything those rows are ‘better’ because it is the Economy plus section and only members such as myself can reserve those ahead of time. Everybody else can only do so upon check-in subject to availability.

    As far as frequent flyer programs go, UA’s is top notch. I won’t even get into details because this post will wind up being much longer than it already is. I’ll save that for another. TG’s sounds pretty good also, Michael. I lost all respect I had for LH’s program recently. But again, that’s for another future thread.

    Hi Greekdude,

    I just got to check this out last week on a UA 744, and I have to stick by my original comments. UAL don’t count 32-34 as Economy Plus, and I would say these have less legroom than normal economy. Also, row 33 doesn’t have a window at either end, and they are pretty poorly located for 32 and 34.

    I’m not disputing your knowledge – this is already well proven. Do United have more than one 744 config like on the 777s (the one I checked out was N177UA on UA919 LHR-IAD on Mon 9th Feb)?

    BTW, I have to say that if anyone’s flying transatlantic on a UA 777 then the best Economy seats that can be reserved in advance have to be 21H (aisle) and 21J (window). These are behind the crew rest seats and have loads and loads of legroom. I had 21J last night and slept like a baby.

    Milage Plus top notch? Agreed wholeheartedly. ๐Ÿ™‚ And I got upgraded this morning using a Mileage plus reward ticket on bmi London – Manchester. ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚ ๐Ÿ™‚

    Mike

    in reply to: Sit down and cross your legs #703385
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    I flew back from CVG on New Year’s Eve and this the captain announced that no congregating near the toilets would be tolerated as part of the heightened security status at that time (since dropped).

    I must point out that I don’t make a habit of hanging around toilets anyway. ๐Ÿ™‚

    Mike

    in reply to: Chicago O' Hare Airport #705811
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by greekdude1
    Is this at ORD, Mike?

    Yes it is. Transit way from T1 to the right of the airside / landside exit in concourse A (?).

    Lovely frozen yoghurt (nice and healthy) with a hot fudge sauce (hmmm).

    Mike

    in reply to: Back from hell: UAL 744s #706457
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by greekdude1
    Mike, I have to disagree here. I’ve been premier or premier executive on UA since the end of 1999 so I’ve sat no further aft than row 35 on a UA 744, ever. Row 32-34 can’t be any more cramped than the rest of the Y-class cabin, per se. My favourite seat on UA’s 744’s is actually 35C or 35H because you have the overwing exit row in front of you and unlimited legroom, so I just stretch my legs out all the way and go to sleep and have the toilet literally right next to me. However when those 2 seats aren’t available, I sit in the 3 rows in front of that which are the aforementioned rows. If anything those rows are ‘better’ because it is the Economy plus section and only members such as myself can reserve those ahead of time. Everybody else can only do so upon check-in subject to availability.

    As far as frequent flyer programs go, UA’s is top notch. I won’t even get into details because this post will wind up being much longer than it already it. I’ll save that for another. TG’s sounds pretty good also, Michael. I lost all respect I had for LH’s program recently. But again, that’s for another future thread.

    Last time I flew on a UAL 744 I was allocated 33A, and this was not classed as E+ by United. I found it rather more cramped than normal economy and was not fond at all.

    Luckily the flight was only about 80% full and a F/A took pity on me and moved me to an empty E+ seat.

    Couldn’t agree more on Mileage Plus – but like you say that’s for another thread.

    Mike

    in reply to: Chicago O' Hare Airport #706458
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by greekdude1
    Ok, since you’re flying UA, it’s going to be too easy. As I mentioned, upon you’re arrival into T5, you’re going to claim your luggage, go through customs and immigration, and upon exiting all that, there will be an interline baggage belt. You just put your baggage onto that on your own (or some handlers will be there to assist you) and go to the monorail to T1. I’m assuming UA will have given you your boarding pass for your New Orleans flight already, so you’ll just have to pass through security again at T1.

    Spot on โ€“ itโ€™s a nice easy process.

    As far as your return goes, to my knowledge, all UA flights depart T1 Intl or domestic. The Intl terminal(T5) is only used for arrivals. That is probably done because it makes it that much easier to connect, and you won’t have to go through security when connecting from domestic to Intl.

    Isnโ€™t the main reason for all international arrivals coming into ORD T5 that it is the only terminal with immigration and customs facilities? The only time I ever flew internationally into any other terminal was into T1,from Toronto, and the US immigration was all taken care of at Pearson before boarding. Like you point out, United send all international departures from T1 because it makes transfers a lot easier, but also because there is no need for any immigration / customs procedure

    There are no problems with people having to come through security when changing from international to domestic connections โ€“ the security check is just a by-product of T5 being relatively distant from the rest.

    O’Hare is much like LAX in that you don’t need to go through security to transfer between domestic terminals – I always walk round to T2 if I have a wait simply because there’s an excellent frozen yoghurt stand there.

    Just my 2p

    Mike

    in reply to: Back from hell: UAL 744s #706952
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Just a thought – if you’re not already in UAL’s Mileage Plus make sure you join before you travel – the miles from one transatlantic round trip can be enough for a bmi freebie within Europe if you count all the bonus miles they keep throwing in.

    The 744s have the same excellent Y class seats as the 777s but no PTVs and (IMHO) the 747 configuration isn’t as nice as on a 767 or 777 because of the three seat sets by the windows. Still a very nice aircraft though, we’re just spoiled with the latter.

    Another suggestion is if you are travelling Y class avoid rows 32-34 – they’re a little area in front of the economy plus, and because of the structure of the aircraft they’re horribly cramped.

    Hope this helps

    Mike

    in reply to: The Regional Jets Opinion Thread #712657
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Originally posted by EAL_KING
    air tran love the B717 they kep ordering more and more

    Indeed they do, but are they using it as a regional jet?

    I don’t regard it as one.

    Mike

    in reply to: what type of aircraft will I be flying on #712691
    mikeconnell
    Participant

    Do you know which airline or at least which holiday company?

    The most likely airlines are Astraeus (737), Britannia (most likely a 757) or BH Air (No idea) – all of thses list charters from Manchester to Sofia.

    Hope this helps

    Mike

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 156 total)