Ok many thanks!…
I knew someone on here would work it out for me. 😀
this picture is from strizhi a russian forum
i can see the blocker
http://pilot.strizhi.info/category/aviation/sukhoi/pak-fai do not think it is fake
The picture isnt coming up, but if your referring to the night time photo, then you have missed some 4months of arguements over that picture (go back a few pages and you’ll see that I had reposted it yet again).
That picture appears to be “retouched” in the intake area and there was another picture which was clearly faked which was also posted on here a while ago.
While the “new” picture showing the blocker or front face looks “better” in terms of it looks purportional, but still very fuzzy.
Its strange that in other pictures where lighting conditions which were brighter, you cant see into the intake at all.
In the video clip where the camera is just a few meters away you still cant see into the intake (note that there is a redish haze in the area of the intake???), yet this picture where we can see into the intake was taken on an overcast sky?
Is it just me or does the little nose fairing on the canoe bulge now appear “attached” to the underside of the wing and the rest of the bulge “seperate” ??
There now only appears to be a “gap” just aft of the nose section.
If these a small missile bays im yet to work out how they open!??
hahahha…. reminds of that Simpsons episode where they try and chase the Wright Flyer with F-15s (?) and then decide to chase it on foot….
Utmost in stupidity and poor planning.
Why are they even wasting time using an F-16?
I know this is going to sound like a bizarre proposition to some of you but what if the toe in angle the dorsal fuselage and engine nacelles blend with each other at doesn’t necessarily follow the intake path, instead being this way for aerodynamic/stealth purposes.
From the photo (and the one posted above) it almost seems the nacelles are purposefully extended to blend into the forward fuselage and the extended part does not follow the same angle the ventral intake-nacelle assembly does. If we were to go by the infamous engine face shot and Paralay’s diagrams most of the engine face would have been bellow the main fuselage contour apex long before the nacelles fully blend with it anyway (remember that the actual engine is smaller than the nacelle makes it appear).
If that were true the actual trolls here are Sukhoi’s engineers.:diablo:
It gives it a nice wedge shape from the nose running down the back of the fuse to the engines
I don’t see anything suspicious. Everything is blurred a little bit – it’s a low-light high-ISO (1600) picture. Even the high-ISO artifacts on the engine face are the same as on the rest of the picture.
I think you need glasses…. all of it a bit blurred?
The whole picture is a bit blurred????
This picture has been discussed over and over and over…
2 pages ago(?) was the last time it was discussed and I think the regulars here would get sick of going over the same things yet again.
If you think the picture is blurry and that there is nothing wrong with the intake then good for you.
We have already seen the intake, and we know that the engine face is visible. Probably there isn’t any radar blocker installed there, but I’m 99% sure that eventually they will install some kind of radar blocker there. The same thing with the radar – there isn’t any radar installed yet, but nobody says that they won’t put any radar some time later. It’s just not installed yet.
We do??
Havent seen a picture yet which “WE” see it…. excluding photoshopped ones.
The illusion is created by fact the top of the intake and the bottom of the intake are not square.

The bottom of the intake mouth lines up more or less with the engine face, while the top doesnt as it follows the contours of the fuse…. (Which is “V” shaped, so the bottom of the intake can sit inline with everything)
The side walls then transition to vertical…. just behind the internal bulge for the main gear.
Clever guys these designers..
Its clear that at the very worst only 1/3 of the face is clear.
Only about half of the engine sits above the top of the front of the intake, forgetting that there appears to be some sort of variable intake ramp and the internals arent known.
More would be hidden because the intake curves around the main gear wheel well.
Nice shot. Too bad it’s with gear down..
BTW, those intakes look very straight to me…
And the undercarriage main wheel dissappears into thin air when the gear goes up?
No one here has ever said that externally there are curves?
Of course it looks straight!
No one is interested on the external looks.
One really has to laugh at the incredible stupidty of some who keep posting a certain picture and think its real…
One thing to remember is what mission your talking about too….
And have a look at then number of aircraft out there which offer a fully combat capable aircraft with 2 seats still…. Super Hornet, GripenNG, Mig-35, the SU-27 series ..
You will never be able to replace the best computer out there… the human brain.
I don’t ask him to leave. I want him to FINALLY provide what he claimed he had.
PAGE ONE of this thread is the picture in question….

Blind freddy can see something is very wrong with the picture.
2 other versions of this picture have been posted.
One is unaltered in terms of lighting (its darker, unlike this picture which has added light/ contrast)
And the other showed a REALLY badly photoshopped blocker!
The above picture is clearly photoshopped as the “blocker” was cleaned up and made to look more “natural”
How is it in broad daylight that you cant see into the intake AT ALL!
Yet with a flash clearly higher then the wing leading edge (which would cast a shadow into the intake) its as clear as mud in this picture?
Apart from the fact the blocker is too big and there is other intake detail missing from the intake walls.
Sure why not… lets have all this extra drag from something which isnt doing much… :rolleyes:
I think the wheels is more in a vertical position, not 100% but pretty close.
Perhaps a tilt on 10-20%..Thanks
Well yes its been repeated dozens of times over and the pictures are so obvious… The tyre does not rotate to lay flat like in the SU-27 series. But hey lets keep posting the same line drawings…. ARGH!