Interesting to note in that old video where its landing and taking off from soft ground its fitted with twin wheels on the nose leg.

I don’t understand this problem about the gunners, NH90 have rear ramp to load/unload troop and you can put gunners on the doorway and on rear windows..?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]230751[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]230752[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230753[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]230754[/ATTACH]

Maybe the MRH90 have a different design ?

Huh? you dont understand???

With the door gunner in the way… how do troops get in and out? Do they limit themselves to the rear ramp only?
(and yes the weak rear loading ramp was also an issue)

The rear window appears to be fixed on the MRH90, unlike those photos which you posted appear to have a sliding window.

Uh Oh—A Crappy Italian Company Might Build The Netherlands’ New Stealth Fighters

The NH-90 seems to suffer from manufacturing and/or design defect that is still being rectified, particularly the naval variant. If I were to build a large naval helo fleet, I would begin and end my search at the Seahawk. The whole system is tested with a vast supplier list and has gobs of equipment cert’d on them.

Since the thread is about Australian Army NH90s… what does the naval variant have to do with it? Australia didnt buy it….

Next some of the issues were poor seat designs which were not compatible with the aussie soldiers webbing, kit etc….
The fact that the door gunners blocked the doors so troops cant get in and out….
Theres been two (that i know of) uncommanded shut downs of the engine in flight (single engine shut downs).
Then of course the usual cost over runs, delays etc….

Wow and still some of you persist it writing the most disgusting comments on here.. nearly 300 people killed and barely a “how tragic” post… but just drivel crap and lay blame squarely at malasian airlines.

wow 295 people killed and some of you truely are sick individuals.
Great to see so much concern for the dead!

How good of a dog fighter was the mig-25?

Ah why ask a question about a role it was never intended for?
Bit like asking how good was the F-15 as a CAS aircraft….

Mig-25 was designed as a straight line interceptor of heavy bombers (as a reaction the XB-70 as stated).

Yes but he didn’t –which part of that don’t you understand ?

Cleary he doesn’t and if people keep feeding the troll then it will just go on and on….. disregard his comments and move on as he is obviously just interested in arguing a point which makes sense to everyone else.

Gerard

B2 … no way! angle of the wing is different see silhouette;

sigh… im sure I speaka gooda English.

THE COLOUR picture shows a B2. The plane is not directly overhead so the “apparent” wing sweep appears different.
Its not rocket science.
The Black and white picture has been altered or is a different picture. The two photos are NOT the same.