dark light

slipperysam

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 731 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-35UB without canopy!? #2551073
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Ahhh… open canopy….. Tally ho and all that!

    Pity we never get to see these movies released here on DVD…… even with subtittles….

    in reply to: What this F-16XL was doing? #2521267
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Actually considering how much equipment and external podded eqiupment and those ugly fuselage tanks that adorns the current F-16…. one wonders if they tried to push the F-16XL today if it would sell????

    The orginal F-16 was supposed to be a lightweight fighter….. not really a bomb-truck…..

    in reply to: what is the story with this F-4 Phantom? #2522134
    slipperysam
    Participant

    I have seen pictures of an F-8 Crusader with one wing folded on approach…

    Cant see why its not possible…. pity its not a closeup

    in reply to: F-111's to stay #2522879
    slipperysam
    Participant

    An interesting article about the F-111 and why it can keep going until 2020…

    And no its NOT from Carlo Kopp…. lol

    ——————————————–

    The proposed early retirement of the F-111 announced by the Defence Department in early 2003 is naïve at best, negligent at worst. The costs of maintenance and operation of the RF-111C/G fleet are constantly over estimated, with the F-111 portrayed as an intolerable financial burden on the defence budget and the most expensive aircraft in the RAAF’s inventory, this is in-fact untrue.

    If one analyses the Defence Annual reports from FY 1998-2003, one will find that it is indeed the F/A-18 Hornet, the nation’s tactical fighter that is the most costly airborne platform to operate, costing the Australian taxpayer $1, 398.1 Million Dollars a year, 30.7% of the RAAF’s annual budget followed by the C-130H/J, B-707 at $892.6 Million (19.6%) and AP-3C Orion at $788.4 Million (17.3%) with the F-111 fleet costing the public $787.1 Million Dollars a year, 17.3% of the RAAF’s annual budget. (1)

    According to the September 2005 edition of Defence Today magazine, the total project cost of ownership for the F/A-18A/B was $8,032.40 million ($113.1 million per aircraft) compared to $2,023.00 million ($72.25 million per aircraft) for the RF-111C/G.

    Another myth perpetrated by Defence is that the F-111 is a decrepit old bird, constantly at danger of falling out of the sky, yet it’s airframe has a longer structural fatigue life than the F/A-18 because of the it’s tough mission requirements, 10,000 hours compared to the Hornet’s 6,000, allowing it to go to 2020 without any major problems. In addition, 82nd Wing’s current supply of Pratt and Whitney TF-30 engines will last the fleet until 2020. (2)

    This is not to mention the almost inexhaustible number of spare parts and airframes located at the Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Centre (AMARC)—the Boneyard—at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona.

    Now we have ascertained the F-111 fleet can indeed go to 2020, the date determined by the Defence Science and Technology Organisation under its Sole Operator Program, there are a series of upgrades that can be undertaken to insure the F-111’s retains it’s edge as the most potent strike aircraft in the region, these include:

    • Retrofitting the F-111 fleet with a glass cockpit arrangement comprising of AMLCD Function Panels and rebuilt SU-46 HUDs from old USAF F-111D’s
    and a 14-15” Fusion Display for RHAWS Threat Footprint, Track/Target/Fuel/Time, JTIDS Tracks, Digital Moving Map.

    • Reallocating funds for AIR 5391 EW Upgrade.

    • Replace TF-30’s with GE-F110-GE-129 engines which would extend range out to 1,400nm and is low risk considering US Navy replaced the F-14’s TF-30’s with the same engine.

    • Reskin F-111 wings, replacing original aluminium honeycomb skins with DSTO-designed carbon fibre composite skins.

    • Use the Block C-4 Mil-STD-1760 upgrade to integrate the latest family of digital weapons including JDAM, JSOW and JASSM.

    • Reinstate the F-111 as the AIR 5418 candidate aircraft and scrap ridiculous AP-3C missile carrier idea.

    in reply to: F-111's to stay #2522905
    slipperysam
    Participant

    In November 16th 1999, Sukhoi announced that it will register its interest with the RAAFs Air 6000 project. The aircraft on offer to the RAAF were the Su-30MK, Su-32 and Su-35. Other contenders at the time included the Typhoon, F/A-18E/F and the F-22A…………

    Sukhoi even proposed that we could start our oven assembly line here in Australia… in order that sales to countries like Malaysia would be quicker and also a manufacturing licence was also offered so we could BUILD our own version of the Su…..

    “”The Defence Department basically shut down the AIR 6000 program before the evaluation or study could be undertaken of the competitor aircraft (Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale, SAAB Gripen, late-build Boeing F-15E and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and the Lockheed Martin F/A-22 Raptor), as all competing aircraft are either in full-rate or low-rate initial production, one can only assume the decision to close down the AIR 6000 competition and go with the JSF was profit rather than quality driven.””

    ————————————–

    On June 26 (2002) the Defence Minister, Sen Robert Hill, in a
    joint press conference with Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane and Chief of Air Force AM Angus Houston, announced that Australia would buy into the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter development program with the intent to purchase the aircraft as a replacement for the F/A-18A and F-111 fleets, should the aircraft meet expected needs in 2006, the planned AIR 6000 decision time.

    For all practical purposes, the government decided to pre-empt the planned AIR 6000 competition and opt immediately for the JSF, with qualifying escape caveats which may or may not be observed at a future date.

    To those closely observing the Canberra defence debate, the move to buy into the JSF program was not unexpected, however the decision to effectively shortlist the JSF into the position of preferred contender was a surprise to most observers and has elicited considerable criticism in strategic
    and informed media circles.

    in reply to: F-111's to stay #2522908
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Can someone smarter than me do a simple summary of how this new fighter requirement came about for RAAF… and how the JSF selection was made?

    My assumptions which may be wrong-
    -The requirement was for a low observable 5th gen fighter?
    -Australia being a JSF partner and not wanting to throw the money spent on that away?
    -No 4th gen fighters would be accepted because they were not 5th gen?

    Thanks in advance.

    The JSF selection was er… a political one…. or a back door deal.
    It was NEVER offered to Australia. And in the orginal competition, selection was down to 4 aircraft. Suddenly those 4 aircraft were out of the race… and the government announces we are buying the JSF and have deposited $100Million (non-refundable).

    in reply to: The Dragon and the Cobra #2523410
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Very impressive…… just wondering… each time he seems to roll to the left just a little before pulling up….

    in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2537817
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Its like looking at an old “Bond” movie….

    Keep them coming… absolutely fascinating !!!

    in reply to: Mirage 5 (?) with retractable canards.. #2540794
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Ok thanks for that….. Can’t say i ever heard of the Milan…. but the picture in the link is the plane i saw in the book…

    Cheers

    in reply to: Australia to buy 24 F-18F's? #2543385
    slipperysam
    Participant

    “”Acquiring a full squadron of Super Hornets from 2009-10 will enable the RAAF to retire its 22 operational F-111s in 2010 without the need for a further costly extension of their service life. It would also mean the air force could reduce to 42 the number of aircraft taking part in the full $1.5 billion Hornet upgrade program. “”

    Hmm… as far as i was aware…. it was only ever planned to upgrade around 40 aircraft…… not the whole fleet…..
    More double talk from the government i guess…….

    in reply to: Australia to buy 24 F-18F's? #2546780
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Well it was bound to happen….
    And when you consider only 40 or so of our present Hornets are getting the centre barrels replaced, we would end up with a large gap in capability while we wait for those… “oh so luverly” F-35s.

    Having a mixed fleet makes good sense… should something ground one type, at least something will be avilable… even if it is a token force…

    in reply to: First C-17 Arrives In Australia #2548464
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Where are you based Sam? I watch the news where I am religiously (drives my missus spare) and I never saw it on any channel

    Sorry Ja been away !

    I am based in Townsville….

    It was Channel Nine news Brisbane which did the story….
    We were told it(our C-17) was going to drop in on us…. but i dunno if it did.
    Too much time indoors i think !

    in reply to: A few questions "ie why are the flankers engines bare metal?" #2548468
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Maybe you could explain the tens of thousands of bare metal aircraft that have served over the years? I’ve never said they weren’t Alclad or had some other surface treatment done. Someone said they didn’t paint the areas in question because titanium doesn’t corrode. I merely pointed out that if that were the reason for it they needn’t have painted the rest of the aircraft either but they did. The reasons those areas aren’t painted is because of heat and heat only.

    Most GA aircraft use Duralim….

    In anycase…. the reason you see so many bare metal planes which dont corrode is because simply there is no paint for moisture to hide under….

    Painting an aircraft is a two edge sword…. while it does protect…. once the paint get old….worn… chipped etc… water finds its way under the paint and started to corrode the skin….

    Bare metal will last longer in dry climates quite well……. which is why planes are stored in the desert like Davis Monthan AB…..

    in reply to: First C-17 Arrives In Australia #2509207
    slipperysam
    Participant

    Well it made the news here on Channel nine…. but i had to laugh…. did you know the C-17 had a payload of 7000tons !!! WOW…. even better then a An-225…….

    A USAF C-17 dropped into town here today as well…. first time i managed to see one too… just 100meters away…. damn no approval to go out to the tarmac….

    Very impressive…..

    in reply to: Craziest scheme ever! The Italian AMX #2509219
    slipperysam
    Participant

    The wing tank writing says its the 70th anniversary of…. the rest i have no idea….

    But its very impressive…. looks like its pixilated…… low res plane !

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 731 total)