My bad, ‘private aircraft’ would have been a far better term to use, thanks 🙂
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqjWpHr5P1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e0KIwmGX0Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAarHa7AAE0
People in Tripoli are reporting that American built Boeing CH-47 Chinook imported from Italy are being used to ferry in African mercenaries into and around the city.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqjWpHr5P1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e0KIwmGX0Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAarHa7AAE0
People in Tripoli are reporting that American built Boeing CH-47 Chinook imported from Italy are being used to ferry in African mercenaries into and around the city.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/02/2011223164125540203.html
A jet carrying Gadaffi’s daughter has been turned away from Malta
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/02/2011223164125540203.html
A jet carrying Gadaffi’s daughter has been turned away from Malta
The aircraft in question was an Su-22M3
http://gizmodo.com/#!5768340/two-libyan-pilots-eject-after-refusing-to-bomb-civilians
I guess they ejected because all the airfields in Benghazi are completely trashed and there was no other way to bring it down safely.
The aircraft in question was an Su-22M3
http://gizmodo.com/#!5768340/two-libyan-pilots-eject-after-refusing-to-bomb-civilians
I guess they ejected because all the airfields in Benghazi are completely trashed and there was no other way to bring it down safely.
They always make that mistake – the last time was in 2006…
I wonder if its the same guy who made the mistake twice? 😀
Also I can’t get over those Fullback photos, they’re gorgeous! 😮
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110221/ap_on_re_eu/eu_malta_libya
They flew low to avoid radar detection. I’m surprised they didn’t drop their rockets into the sea to make it easier.
It’s like China’s Top Gun screw up, but Holiday related!
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Not only that .The ROCAF has been extremely dissatisfied with the overall performance and reliability of the Mirage. News published in 2009 in Taiwan revealed grave problems like the faults on rotors in engines. France and Taiwan had not solved this turbine blade module trouble yet. French techs who went to Taiwan to study the trouble, recommended shortening the time between overhauls, and Taiwan suspects France is tempting Taiwan to spend more on procuring more spare parts
They now see clearly it was a bad decision to acquire the MIRAGE in 1992.
They need the Block 52+ desperately. The F-16 52+ is all over the Mirage anywhere ,any day and under any condition. I don’t understand why the US still refuse to deliver the Block 52+ to Taiwan..
Hmmm, I wonder what was the name of that country across the Taiwan Strait that holds nearly 900 billion is US debt and trades hundreds of millions of dollars in trade to the US daily? Hmm… can’t seem to recall…
If Taiwan really meant business, they could have bought the M2k production line & ToT after India declined to take it (oh no I start to use the & like swerve does), and be able to build and maintain and upgrade their Mirages as they see fit. They could have integrated whatever missile they wanted on them, be it israeli, south african or brazilian if eads didn’t want to provide more Micas.
But it seems these people are more interested in filling their own pockets (see frigates deal) than doing what’s best for Taiwan (if they’re not PRC agents in the first place).
Nic
Exactly, through these sort of foriegn contracts some unscrupulous elements in the ROCAF are able to get a cut of money on the side through these deals. I suspect this is why there is so much opposition in the ROCAF towards just starting up IDF production and going through a systemic upgrade of their existing IDF because they can’t ‘shake them down’ in these under the table deals
U.S. May Sweeten Indian Jet Bid
India operating the Sukhoi/HAL FGFA, their indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft AND the F-35 at the same time would be…. very strange
Does anyone know who was of the engine DV-2 of L-59? It follows in production? PSLM still exist? I take this opportunity to consult his MBTO and service life
Their website is down but their contact info is here
http://www.airframer.com/direct_detail.html?company=113384
From what I can tell they’re still around…. their just not very good at keeping a website up
Clearly investing into two very similar designs for very similar role(s) is a waste of resources.
There are three assumptions here benhongh that you may have failed to consider.
1. That having two ‘similar’ designs is a waste of resources. This is assuming that there are resources being invested into a single entity. The WZ-10 was designed in Changhe by the Changhe Aircraft Industries Corporation and the WZ-19 is being developed by the Changhe Aircraft Industries Corporation. Both companies are under AVIC but both compete with each other for contracts and investment. This is a competition, much like how there is competition between Chengdu and Shenyang and between Guizhou and Hongdu for contracts. AVIC is by far NOT a monolithic, top-bottom organization
2. That the designs are similar. This is assuming from the few pictures (or fakes as you call them) are of two helicopter designed to perform similar roles. Looking at the difference between the WZ-10 and WZ-19 it is clear that the WZ-19 is both smaller, lighter in weight and lighter in ordinance than the more heavy and heavily armed WZ-10. The WZ-19 even seems to lack a chin mounted cannon which is generally seen as a hallmark of a heavy attack helicopter. Given this apparent disparity in both size and weight between the two designs one can assume they have could have different roles in mind, such as one filling an armed reconnaissance role, similar to other helicopters in its weight class. While another helicopter is designed to fill a heavier CAS role.
3. The usage of investment resources. Theres also the possibility that helicopter may be a private venture. Many times Aircraft corporations in China have invested and developed aircraft themselves, without an official PLAAF tender or request for such aircraft. They are submitted privately to the PLAAF for evaluation or, designed for export. Two prime examples of this are the FC-1 which was designed primarily for export and funded internally by Chengdu. Another example is the L-15, Hongdu designed the aircraft without direct PLAAF involvement but rather, are submitting the L-15 themselves in the hopes of impressing the PLAAF top brass to gain a tender.