If I may just add my opinion then can I say take a look at Sony Alpha.I have the A350 and it’s fantastic,I was using a bridge camera(Lumix FZ-50) but i could not believe the jump in quality when I switched to the Alpha.They use Minolta fit lenses so there’s lot of lenses out there and not too expensive.Of course Canon and Nikon have a larger range of accesories but anyting you can get for thse you can get for the Sony.And also Sony have just launched a new range so the older models could be picked up a little cheaper( and i think they look better too,also much nicer to hold) Whatever you choose I think will be good enough,in this day and age and for your budget there isnt really a ‘Bad’ choice just what you feel the most comfortable using is the best.

very nice.

My first try at a fsx Screenshot. let me know what you think.
An Old britannia 767 waiting for takeoff behind a Cessna at LPL

very nice,where did you get the Britannia 767 from? i been wanting 1 for ages.is it full model with real flightdeck.

No they didn’t do anything like that but it was a pathetic reason because the picture showed and dull cloudy day.they actually said re-edit and re-upload.
I did get a snotty email from JP saying i’d uploaded a rejected picture and “DO NOT SEND THIS AGAIN”

The 1st one is pretty good but looks a tiny bit over sharpened.The 2nd shot is a little too dark.Personally i think theyre good but as NCL said JP screeners are very picky although not as bad as A.net screeners.And once on ap.net i was rejected because there was no sun shining on the aircraft.

Very nice,I particularly like the Saudi 777 shots.Good timing on the Pegasus too.