Thanks for the replies, all.
This thread is worth a look:
Hah – you’re not wrong!
This isn’t the further reading that I had in mind when I asked for it above 😉 At least the first-hand accounts in the book can’t be full of misinformation.
B52 landing at Duxford:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSIGd6COFb8
I think you can see the moment when it gained those ripples in the fuselage behind the c0ckpit…
Its where you go to get away from the commentary, the wind breaks, the step ladder..
Just a point of pedantry: step ladders are not allowed at Duxford air shows and those people who use them a very naughty people indeed and will get asked to take them down. 😉
The naughty field is where many of the best photos that appear on the this and other forums are taken. Many of the toggies attend both days of the airshow choosing the best weather day to stand in the naughty field and the lesser weather day photographing and socialising within the airfield. They therefore do contribute towards the running costs of DX and the participating aircraft. Quite a number of those in the naughty field have friends of DX membership and frequent the airfield many times a year buying food and drinks from the outlets as well as spending generously in the shop. Quite a few are also members of Friends of TFC, Radial Nine, the Blenheim Society…
Should they be in the field? Probably not. Do a number of them share their excellent photos, yes. Do forum members here and else where enjoy them. Yes!
Yep – you nailed it there!
… I think it should be scrapped and just post in the appropriate forum.
Love the Hurricane pics and agree with the above sentiment. Thanks for sharing both 🙂
And if it was your wife with no interest in planes with the two yapping dogs who sat next to us we would just like to thank you for making our day.
Was that up the top, near the wooden railings? I nipped up there during the Reds’ display, in case I could get a photo as one of them bounced the cliffs as happened in the last two years. Sadly they didn’t, but I reckon it was a good thing in the end as those two dogs would have gone utterly mental if they had!
Nice shots Martin – I was also there on Saturday, along with the rest of the aviation enthusiasts in Europe it seems! I’ve never seen it so busy. My other half and I walked 7 miles to Eastbourne via Beachy Head from our holiday cottage on the Sunday – apparently “one day on Beachy Head is enough”. Looks like both you an I beg to differ…
I’ll post up a few of my pics in a bit but I’m glad you got some good shots on the Sunday, I watched from the pier as the Arrows, Mig 15 and others flew nice and close past the cliffs. Grrr.
Many thanks for posting these – really interesting photos.
That’s a great Nimrod picture and a very interesting serial – only 3 after K5054!
Thanks for posting Phil, some very nice photos there! I wasn’t able to get to RIAT so it’s great to see what they got up to.
I particularly like the shot of the Synchro Pair (Spit and Typhoon) and also the Vulcan landing – that’s a sight you don’t see very often!
I wonder if that’s the last time we’ll see the Red Arrows and Vulcan flying together?
Spitfire N3200
I sent an email to IWM Duxford, asking what the plans are for N3200 now that it’s in their care. Looks like it’s to be kept airworthy and active at airshows, which is good news – nice one IWM!
“Spitfire N3200 is now on display in our Battle of Britain hangar. We think it is quite possible that the plane may have started it’s life in the same hangar in 1940.
I’m sure you will be pleased to hear that the plan is for the Spitfire to fly at Air Shows at Duxford and around the country.
We hope that we will be able to inform the public when it will not be on show here at the museum. “
Beautiful photos, David.
Old Warden just seems to lend itself to those sort of photo’s doesn’t it? – of course it’s got *nothing* to do with your lensmanship 😉
What is that first aircraft? – I don’t remember seeing it at OW a couple of weeks back…
Keep snapping and we’ll keep enjoying.
Chaps, while I agree that the XH558 headline is misleading, I think you have to be a little careful in which direction you aim your rants.
Unless I’m mistaken, quite a few of the inaccurate bits of journalism quoted earlier in this thread, are actually from other news outlets, and not the BBC.
In my opinion we are extremely lucky to have an impartial news source such as BBC News (which is a separate entity to the rest of the BBC) in this country.
The BBC, and BBC News have faced drastic cuts in their funding over the last government, and its not getting any better with this one. This headline is the sort of thing you get when there’s too much work and not enough resources to do it accurately. You might find that an email to the relevant person , correcting them with the facts would clear this up.
For many people I think it’s a case of not knowing what you have until it’s gone. This country would certainly be a lot worse off if we only had Fox / Sky / Mail Online etc to rely on. I’m certainly not happy trusting news from an organisation which has its own political and economic axe to grind – at least with the BBC mistakes are honest ones.