dark light

smudgersmith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tangmere Station ORB details #1093226
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Yes, I have the complete ORB.

    But not here…..!!

    It is with a colleague and I hope to have it back in week or so.

    Andy

    Andy,

    Thank you for that.

    Cheers

    Steve

    in reply to: 218 Sqn, Downham Market Feb-Sept 1943 #1146376
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    I am trying to locate a Squadron photo of 218 Sqn at Downham Market taken between March, 1943 and mid september, 1943.

    My father served his first tour of Ops as W/OP-AG on Stirlings with 218 Sqn at Downham Market during this period and I feel sure that he would feature in this photo.

    If anyone has a copy I would welcome hearing from them.

    Hi,

    I am the No.218 Squadron Association historain, if you would like to contact me off board I will be happy to help.

    Kind regards

    Steve

    in reply to: Who's your favorite Aviation Artist? #1097486
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    The late and missed Keith Aspinall, this is a commissioned painting he did for me in 2008. A good friend very much missed.

    in reply to: Artist Required !! #1167386
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Gents,

    Thanks for all your comments and pointers. I’ m afraid some of the amounts wanted will see me in very serious trouble with “er-in-doors”.

    Thanks anyway. !!

    kind regards

    Steve

    in reply to: WW.1 Loss help needed #1178065
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Hi John,

    Sincere apologises mate, yes all were of great help. Thank you.

    in reply to: Who could have replaced AVM Harris? #1178197
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Sholto Douglas

    Why. ??

    in reply to: Who could have replaced AVM Harris? #1178226
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Must confess Bennett was a candidate, but like F.N his personality I think may have been a problem, he was not known for his tolerance and I think he may have struggled politically with his American counterparts.

    I am surprised no as mentioned Cochrane. !!

    in reply to: Attitudes towards Harris #1181969
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    ‘The ultimate aim of the attack on a town area is to break the morale of the population which occupies it. To ensure this we must achieve two things; first, we must make the town physically uninhabitable and, secondly, we must make the people conscious of constant personal danger. The immediate aim, is therefore, twofold, namely, to produce(i) destruction and (ii) the fear of death.’

    The above statement was in 1941 exactly what was required given the proven limitations of the command at this stage of the war. However we are talking about early 1944 onwards when Bomber Command had already proven to a degree that it had the ability both tactically and strategically to carry out raids on selective targets and not just cities.

    We appear to be going off at a tangent here. I am not attacking the man just his apparent resistance to utilise bombing aids that could have been used to a more beneficial effect. I have already mentioned he was the right man for the job in 1942 and continued to be up until his resistance to listen to the Senior Air Staff and Portal from early 1944 onwards.

    His commitment to victory is unquestioned.

    in reply to: Attitudes towards Harris #1182256
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Hello Eddie, !!

    It is the post invasion period I am referring too. Bomber Command had proved despite Harris initial scepticism and the loss of some of it’s most experienced crews that they could bomb accurately small strategic targets in the occupied territories.

    Even with the “limited” range of both devices, important targets could have been attacked with some degree of accuracy in the Ruhr including Synthetics oil plants, oil plants, selected armaments factories and transportation hubs and communication centres. This surely would have been more beneficial then the return to area bombing cities that happen to have industrial targets located within it.

    It is on record that from July 1944 of all the total bombs used / dropped in “area” raids on Germany, by far the greatest part, over 300,00 tons were dropped after July 1st 1944. This is when Bomber Command was equipped with some of the most accurate bombing aids then available, GH and Oboe. You correctly say that both were limited in range but with the foot hold in France secure GH & Oboe stations were relocated on the continent and almost immediately gave the additional range needed to attack targets in Eastern Germany. However, given the range increase, the proven ability of Bomber Command to attack accurately industrial targets, Harris doggedly continued with “his” area bombing policy.

    I quote Albert Speer “ The Allied air attacks remained without decisive success until early 1944. This failure, which is reflected in the armaments output figures for 1943 and early 1944, is attributed principally to the tenacious efforts of the German workers and factory managers and also the haphazard and too scattered form of attacks of the enemy who, until the attacks on synthetic oil plants, based his raids on no clearly recognisable economic planning. The American attacks followed a definite system of assault on industrial targets, were by far the most dangerous “ *

    Regarding the point made about “Ultra”. Harris was well aware of this and for some reason choice to ignore it the information given to him. Harris was not convinced that the information this was accurate and basically regarded it as another “panaceas”.

    * The strategic Air Offensive Against Germany, 1939-1945 Vol. IV.

    in reply to: Attitudes towards Harris #1182971
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Sorry, I edited my post whilst you were typing yours, so I will highlight my change –

    If I recall correctly from what I have read, Harris believed he could end the war in 6 weeks, with an all-out bomber offensive on Berlin IF the 8th Air Force would come in on it. Who is say that the overwhelming force of the two wouldn’t have been successful? Okay, so he continued without US support and it didn’t work, and he could perhaps have looked at the offensive on London in 1940 as an indicator that this kind of offensive had the potential not to work. But of course, a war had never really been fought in this way before, so only with hindsight can we say that he should have switched to the kind of targets the 8th Air Force were targetting.

    If anything Harris was a very clever and shrewd commander using the American 8th Air force to justify a pre-longed campaign? The 8th AF was not in a position to undertake deep penetration raids to Berlin in 1943, I am sure Harris was well aware of this when he made this sweeping comment.
    From memory it was not until March 1944 the US AF undertook their first operation and again from memory they suffered grievous losses. The “Battle of Berlin” was almost over by then, and the men of Bomber Command had paid heavily.

    By including the 8th Air force in this statement Harris as basically admitted that RAF Bomber Command could not have “wrecked Berlin from end to end” let alone even brought the war to a conclusion on it’s own. Regardless of continuing heavy losses and the withdrawal of the Short Stirling and Merlin equipped Halifax’s he continued attacking Berlin for little worth while results.

    I agree, hindsight is wonderful, however what would have happened if the weight of Bomber Command could have been directed to synthetic oil, aircraft production and selected industrial targets and not cities. !!

    Bomber Command proved it was capable of attacking selective targets and destroying them from early 1944, pre-invasion targets, VI sites, transportation centres etc. This continued if but on a limited scale with No.3 Group right up until the end of hostilities.

    in reply to: Attitudes towards Harris #1182999
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    Hi Steve,

    That’s the point, senior members of the air staff were unhappy with Harris in 1944, hindsight just confirms they were correct. !

    in reply to: Attitudes towards Harris #1183144
    smudgersmith
    Participant

    It is my opinion that Harris should have been removed from command soon after the bloody debacle of the Battle of Berlin. His “obsession” with the destruction of Nazis Germany’s capital cost RAF Bomber Command some of the best aircrew the command had for little or no strategic importance. His dogged attitude which served the command so well when he took over in 1942 was in my opinion misplaced in 1944 when the whole nature of bombing had changed with the introduction of sophisticated bombing aids like Oboe & G-H which were in 1944 available in numbers that could have made a difference to strategic / selective bombing, i.e. Oil.

    His reluctance even towards the end of the war to switch to selective bombing instead of “area” bombing is well documented and is one that in my opinion justifies his removal in 1944.

    This was the feeling of a number of senior members of the Air Staff at the time, including Portal.

    I await the flak. !!!!

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)