dark light

Beaufighter VI

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 505 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LF363 with four-bladed prop #907348
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    On my very first day at BBMF as NCO i/c I went to Northolt to meet the rest of the crew who werwe attending to LF363. Whilst taxying the gear had been selected up instead of the flaps. After repairs to radiator fairing, flaps etc we flew her with a four blade prop altering the blade settings to suit the different reduction gear ratio. I went to BBMF in 1978, unsure when we got her flying again.

    in reply to: RAF Museum – An Interesting Development #913176
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    There was a time when large organisations could ignore enthusiasts ……

    How true. There is a well known family history company “Find My Past”. Well loved, thousands of subscribers paying up to £150/ year subscription.

    On 1st April 2014 (been here before?) they introduced a new “platform”, guess what, useless. They refused to reinstate the old platform, subscribers left in droves to their competitors. The answer then was to have a “Facebook Page” which aired their problems even further. Some bright spark helped them down the slippery slope by starting a rival FB page, “Can’t Find My Past”

    FMP CEO was forced to grovel, time extensions were given on subscriptions, offers made for reduced subscriptions, it is improving slowly but many people are voting with their feet. Six months later still not fixed.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2014 #879419
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    No trouble with traffic! Duxford village gridlocked, school car park took a fortune but had to overflow on to adjoing fields, A505 stationary both ways, M11 closed one way, talk of people queing for four hours.
    Getting out Saturday, one friend was out in 15 minutes, his son took two hours.
    Good job us locals know the back ways.

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #889734
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Well done Ed, you have it!

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #889744
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Doesn’t look that low – an air to air shot with the ground underneath somewhere out of the bottom of the picture.

    Try this one, not taken from another a/c. Where when and how?

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #889883
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Who says they don’t do low?

    in reply to: Connie Edwards fighters – Now sold. #892719
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Are you all sure that these aircraft are not heading for Biggin Hill?

    …………….. or Duxford?

    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Dial in Rhodesia, and trying to obtain parts at the height of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI), with world–wide sanctions, and the scale of the task is enormous…but they did it.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231363[/ATTACH]

    With help from their friends.

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #913166
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    FM213 has more fuselage windows, and is fairly bare inside compared to PA474, which has a lot (if not all by now?) of the wartime equipment fitted. ‘474 has an oval lower bomb aimer’s window, whereas 213’s is rectangular, and ‘474 has the H-shaped aerials fitted either side of the nose as well.

    PA474 has Lincoln u/c’s and I seem to recall Hastings wheels and tyres. Memory fades a bit after thirty years.

    Mk. X Lancasters used American bearings throughout and I also believe they had US radio equipment.

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #915607
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Note from the itinerary that both BBMF and CWPH Lancasters might be visiting Duxford. I wonder if IWM have thought of dragging their a/c out onto the flightline to make three?

    in reply to: 2014 – RNHF Sea Fury incident at Culdrose #922847
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Reminds me of the incident Spencer Flack had with G-FURY (WJ244) on the 2 August 1981. Thirty three years ago almost to the day, how time passes. He was in transit from ‘up North’ when the engine started to overheat. Abreast of RAF Waddington he decided to land. With gear down, aiming for the ‘piano keys’ the engine quit, he selected gear up, one leg didn’t make it and he bellied in to a potato field on approach. Seriously hurt, fractured leg, a/c on fire, hood jammed, he smashed his way out with his head, lucky he was wearing a bone dome. Rolled over the side of the aircraft and was nearly run over by the fire crew who did not see him amongst the potatos.

    Sharing a bottle of gin with him in hospital, I think it was RAF Nocton Hall, he said as he was hot in the aircraft that day so he rolled his sleeves up and didn’t wear his oxygen mask, hence his minor burns. One other nugget was if you have an engine failure in a Fury at 5’000 where you will land is immediately underneath you and you will only be able to complete a 180 due to the high drag.

    Up to that point BBMF crews flew in leather helmets, from then on it was bone domes.

    in reply to: Spitfire propeller blade RA 10130..Query #927757
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    RA10130JCS Cristofin and RA10130JT Jablo were fitted to R19/5F5/1 propellers, Spitfire XIV with Griffon 65.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #930357
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Have you looked at the prop fitted to the Fiat G-59, almost P-51 but not.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #930373
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    The DeHavilland Archive at Bankstown went to HARS.

    The only relevant manual that went to HARS was AP1538D Vol. 1 dated June 1945 amended to 1950, De Havilland Hydromatic Variable-Pitch Propellers.
    This covers 27 props. fitted to the following a/c.
    Albermarle, Beaufighter, Firebrand, Halifax, Lancaster, Mosquito, Stirling, Sunderland, Tempest, Typhoon and Wellington.

    There is no interchangeability list.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #930922
    Beaufighter VI
    Participant

    Do you also know if DEHAVILLAND manufactured hydromatic parts are directly interchangeable with US manufactured hydromatic parts? Thank you

    Props covered:- 22D30, 22D40, 23D40, 33D50, 23E50, 33E60, 23F60, 24D50, 24E50, 24E60, 24F60. The only part numbers given are Hamilton Standard. Will come back to you re.
    copy.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 505 total)