India, China end stand off; withdraw troops from Ladakh
In a sudden development, India and China pulled back their troops from the stand off point at Daulat Beg Oldi sector in Ladakh, where the Chinese forces had intruded nearly three weeks back, official sources said tonight.
Cheers,
For a country of the size and with the economic growth of India does it really matter to try to economize by having the air force and navy use the same fighter type? It might actually be better to operate two different types because of the benefits to the local industry and relations with France and Russia. Additionaly, in case of conflict you are kind of covered in both fronts if either France or Russia decide to pull their support, IMO.
Best regards,
Just noticed this story:
Dutch air force to monitor Baltic airspace in 2017
Dutch F-16 fighter aircraft will be deployed to police the airspace of the 3 Baltic countries in the first quarter of 2017. This was announced by Minister Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert this morning.The ambassadors to The Hague of the three Baltic States have just been to visit Mrs Hennis-Plasschaert at the Ministry of Defence. She then officially announced that the Netherlands will be taking on the Baltic Air Policing mission from January to April. It is the second time the Netherlands takes on this NATO mission.When the 3 Baltic countries joined NATO in 2004, it was agreed that they would not purchase any fighter aircraft. Other NATO member states would then take over the air policing tasks on a rotational basis. The Netherlands first took its turn from April to June 2005, deploying 4 F-16s and around 100 military personnel. That air force detachment operated from Šiauliai military airfield in Lithuania.
source: defensie.nl
I’m surprised that they are organizing/schedulling this deployment so far ahead.
Best regards,
Perhaps the MMRCA is not a done deal after all!???
I guess that this is something that is now general to all current and future deals. No procurement program is a done deal until all aircraft/equipment are delivered.
And it makes a lot of sense for Gripen and the other competitors to stay as they have already invested a lot of money in those “campaigns”. Just in case…
Best regards,
Some F-16 users acquired over 200 of them (Egypt, Israel, Netherlands, Turkey) and many acquired over 100 (Belgium, South Korea, Taiwan, Greece).
Not to forget that some of them were able to buy cheap second-hand F-16s to reach the necessary number of fighters that they needed. Now as their current fighters reach their limits and need to be quickly replaced there won’t be any cheap and second-hand F-35s to buy and it will force them to look elsewhere.
Best regards,
Tradition? Anti-military oposition? More powerful civil government overview?
Anyway, if you were to do a presentation to the Portuguese politicians (from any political party) and told them that by privatizing SAR they could receive bribes from companies competing for SAR contracts or by creating a semi-private company where they could place in a management position anyone that would like, for example a cousin or friend, they would immediatelly start privatizing it.
Privatization most times is less for economic reasons and more for political/corruption reasons. In a world where citizens are opposing more and more to the military you see politicians take advantadge of that to gain votes or to simply pull their own schemes to make easy money.
Going back to that scenario that put in regards to SAR, it has already happened in the past with the Portuguese Air Force’s role in firefigthing during the summer, where politicians put a stop to the use of C-130 doing firefigthing missions using kits in favor of contracting more aircraft to certain companies. This at a level that allowed for the past decade companies to even fix prices between them for renting helicopters and airplanes to the government.
Cheers,
Wouldn’t Russia also have an advantage because of their engines?
Cheers,
Heck the money goes to LM anyway, why do they care if people buy F16s or F35s?
Nic
From what understood from eagle’s post he wasn’t referring to the F-16 but to something else based on Boeing’s proposal. Besides, LM might not mind but the DoD would mind as the F-35 costs would keep going up.
Cheers,
If done right, it could form the basis for an F-16 replacement for export customers.
And steal F-35 orders? Quick! Kill it with fire!
Cheers,
I wonder if even Airbus had a direct competitor in cargo capacity terms to the C-27J if it wouldn’t lose anyway to LM in Australia because of politic reasons.
Air forces don’t look only or that much at the aircraft’s cargo capacity any more. While the C-295 might loose when it comes only to cargo capacity, it might win in a competition because of its troop carrying capacity, operating costs and, more importantly to some, the maritime patrol variant that it offers.
Cheers,
A while ago there was a lot of rumours going around the Army aviation unit that the NH-90 would only be received to honour the deal and that they would be sold after their delivery. From what I have been told personnel training has already begun.
As for the Alpha-Jet and the Epsilon I wouldn’t expect a replacement. For some years there’s been a lot of officers talking about acquiring the PC-21 to replace both fleets but in the last years the training has been kind of outsourced with pilots being sent to other countries to do their basic and advanced training. Training in the US is common for the F-16 but is something new for the rest of pilot training and the main reason that has been pointed out is that it’s cheaper.
If South Korea selects Portugal to install it’s training centre you can bet that the Alpha-Jet fleet will be retired the next day.
The successor of the F-16 is a big unknown. Will we even have the economic means or the political will to replace them? There’s too many options. They could still be further upgraded just to avoid having to buy a replacement.
As for an actual replacement there will also be a lot options on the market. From second-hand Gripens to second-hand Typhoons, maybe there will be enough pressure from the US to buy the F-35 or even maybe the T-50 if the relationship with South Korea further improves.
Best regards,
I wonder if it actually wouldn’t be cheaper to have a private AN124 move those helicopters when one has to ship equipment to an OT, instead of wasting your fleet’s flying hours?
Cheers,
British politicians are like any other politician. And by this I mean that they won’t want this kind of egg on the face. The British media will go nuts on them and the general public will call an end to the UK’s carrier capability.
So, even if the F-35 turns out to not even be able to take off the ground, at this stage, I doubt that they would cancel it.
Cheers,
Portuguese AF: Wanted F-5E, got A-7P http://www.falcoes.net/f5a7.htm
Best regards,
The Portuguese company Empresa de Investigação e Desenvolvimento de Electrónica SA (EID) received in July a contract from Rohde & Schwarz Australia Pty Ltd to carry modifications on the ICCS 5 (Integrated Communications Control System) communications control system installed on the former U.K. Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) L3006 RFA “Largs Bay” large amphibious landing ship acquired by Australia.
The modifications are aimed to adapt the ICCS5 to Royal Australian Navy (RAN) requirements before it arrive in Australia by December. EID started the modifications in early July and is to conclude the work in September.
The ship named HMAS “Choules” is being refitted by A&P Group Limited in Falmouth. Works includes maintenance to the main engines, propulsion systems and painting the hull, along with major modifications and upgrades.
Between 2002 e 2006, EID delivered the ICCS 5 solution for the four RFA´s Bay Class vessels according a contract awarded by Rohde & Schwarz Nederland BV.
RFA “Largs Bay” was decommissioned in April as a result of force reductions resulting from the U.K. Strategic Defence Review (SDR).
http://defesaglobal.wordpress.com
Best regards,