dark light

planejunky

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 273 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A-26s in Korea, 1951/52 #1407493
    planejunky
    Participant

    Fantastic stuff Les. It’s stuff like this that makes this forum such as great place to hang out! 😀

    in reply to: Peter Vacher's Hurricane mk1 engine ran today #1408579
    planejunky
    Participant
    in reply to: Peter Vacher's Hurricane mk1 engine ran today #1409312
    planejunky
    Participant

    That’s great news, another Hurricane is always welcome! Pardon my ignorance, but who’s Peter Vacher? It’s a name I’m not familiar with.

    in reply to: E.E Lightning #1410673
    planejunky
    Participant

    Here we go again……..

    Buccaneer = COMPLEX

    Straight from the horse’s mouth http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=465125#post465125

    Sorry Mike I rarely visit the other forums here so wouldn’t have seen this thread! 😉

    in reply to: E.E Lightning #1410734
    planejunky
    Participant

    The Buccaneer stands a good chance and Hawker Hunter Aviation are busy working towards this aim. The Phantom – well nobodys tried yet!

    So presumably the Buccaneer comes under the same “intermediate” catagory as the Sea Vixen then?

    Personally I don’t think there’s much chance of seeing a civvy Phantom in UK skies again.

    in reply to: E.E Lightning #1411175
    planejunky
    Participant

    The Vulcan is being supported by the design authourity Marshalls of Cambridge on behalf of Bae, hence the difference. The Lightning will not fly in the UK even if it does get the backing of the design authourity – the CAA as I understand it dont consider the design ‘safe’. The fact that they have said that means it would need someone with balls the size of beach balls to sign the paperwork and take responsibilty for it.

    From what I gather there were one or two prangs with the Lightning in it’s service days, so maybe the CAA are right to stand their ground on this one. Interesting how they managed to convince the CAA over the Sea Vixen though!

    in reply to: E.E Lightning #1411317
    planejunky
    Participant

    You guys in Britain aren’t even allowed to have rifles, and you ask why you’re not allowed to have a fighter jet? :diablo:

    As always, thank you for your useful contribution. :confused:

    All are classified as ‘complex’ aircraft and as a result need the backing of the ‘design authority’.

    As it’s looking like we’ll now see a Vulcan fly in UK skies once more, it will be interesting to see about other aircraft of her generation.
    The CAA originally stated that the Vulcan would never fly again either, citing the “Complex” catagory as one of the reasons. When or if this aircraft flies, surely it weakens the CAA’s “Complex aircraft” argument against prospective operators of Lightnings and Buccaneers. If they were to obtain product support from BAE Systems, could it lead to legal arguments with the CAA?

    in reply to: A packet marked 'Bovingdon Mitchells 23 May 1978' #1411343
    planejunky
    Participant

    Absolutely wonderful pictures, especially at a time when we face losing our last airworthy B25 to the USA. 🙁

    in reply to: Brussels Air Museum-Yesterday. #1411504
    planejunky
    Participant

    it’s rather chaotic in there, but it really is a fabulous collection.

    Chaotic is sometimes good. It’s like sifting through an old garden shed, you just never know what you’ll come across!

    Great pics Gary, thanks for posting them.

    in reply to: Squadron Silverware #1415386
    planejunky
    Participant

    The retired Sqn standards are displayed in the Main College building at RAFC Cranwell. When sqns are reformed their colours move to the new Station.

    I stand corrected! 😀

    in reply to: Squadron Silverware #1416309
    planejunky
    Participant

    I think I’m correct is saying that the retired Squadron standards are returned to Bently Priory, however the silverware I’m not so sure about.

    in reply to: bits n bobs #1416971
    planejunky
    Participant

    Stunning! 😀 Love that shot of the fighters over Coningsby.

    in reply to: Malta Aviation museum pics #1419628
    planejunky
    Participant

    What a great place, thanks for posting! 😉

    in reply to: More photo from Coningsby on Sunday #1423405
    planejunky
    Participant

    One of the daily rags had a bit about AMRAAMs and F.3s disagreeing with each other some months ago – “yet another defence procurement scandal” etc. etc.

    That sounds about right! 😉

    in reply to: More photo from Coningsby on Sunday #1426177
    planejunky
    Participant

    Thank chaps, yes the F3’s were landing back after QRA duty, as you can see they are fully loaded with live weapons.

    I noticed the ASRAAM’s but what gives with the Skyflash missiles? What’s happened to those nice new AMRAAM’s the F3 was supposed to get, or have they disappeared in the latest round of defence cuts?

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 273 total)