Growing pains aside, what exactly can Su-30SM do that Su-35S can’t? Su-35S can do everything Su-30SM can and better.
The first and hugely important in nowadays battlespace (sensor fusion bs story aside) it`s that you have two lucky dudes operating the machine
I’m sure that they would appreciate having those, but is the simple “it’s not available yet” too subtle somehow? 🙂
It`s available in the Ka-52, which a lot people say its superior to Mi-28
Su-30 SM, nothing comes closer
The optics are a huge improvement over ancient Raduga.
To date it does not have full DIRCM suit, just RWR and LWR.
Well thats nice, but DIRCM and MAWS are more important for that theatre of operations
Dutch are saying warhead was a 9n314M which Russia still uses. Almaz is saying 9m314 vanilla which is a museum piece. Almaz is probably lying through its teeth. I misread article.
Now, how exactly would investigators know those fine differences between warheads ?
I find this a little far fetched, I guess besides Almaz engineers and real world operators (read officers) no one knows
I don`t think there is an accesible database updated with that kind deep technical info……
so whats new exactly ? Americans being arrogant and bitch slapped by euro pilots flying either similar aircrafts or inferior
http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=287&t=63009
remember all the time, during air=air engagements above here between the US F15Cs and Dutch F16s versus Sea Harriers, 90% of the engagements had the F-15Cs defeated and the pilots made up lots of excuses on the radio to “Freddy”, the GCI controller and really did not like a foreign type/pilot successfully engaging them in their mighty F-15C’s.
I can just imagine the same going with the USAF F-22 pilots. I wonder what their reactions were or if there was any excuses. I used to love listening to the F15 pilots grumble about being whacked by Sea Harriers nearly everytime they came down for DACT.
http://www.16va.be/mig-29_experience.htm
Even against the latest Block 50 F-16s the MiG-29 is virtually invulnerable in the close-in scenario. On one occasion I remember the F-16s did score some kills eventually, but only after taking 18 ‘Archers’. We didn’t operate kill removal (forcing ‘killed’ aircraft to leave the fight) since they’d have got no training value, we killed them too quickly. (Just as we might seldom have got close-in if they used their AMRAAMs BVR!) They couldn’t believe it at the debrief, they got up and left the room!
“but IMHO its really just shown a number of technology shortcomings. ”
There is a good reason we stopped seeing a lot of footage from US bombings when the transition from laser guided to GPS guided was made. GPS is frankly going to be less accurate almost all the time because of lack of terminal correction and I would bet the majority of US bombing is pretty much exactly as bad as this Russian bombing. If they were lobbing TV guided or laser guided it would be pin point too but nobody wants to waste the money. What the Pentagon releases is the “best of” clips.
That is correct, JDAM is not that accurate thats why americans added a laser guidance system
http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/missiles/jdam/docs/laser_jdam_overview.pdf
Hello all 🙂
I present my video Flight Deck Ops2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mehij8v5HI
Youtube If you say “no available video ” click this link :
hope it will please you
Have a great weekend 🙂
Friendly
Ange(L)
great vid man, thanks, music sucks though
On the subject of cruise missile failure/success rate, RUSI think that 32 were intended for launch, 2 failed to launch, and 4 dropped out of the sky prior to reaching Syria. That leaves 26 that got to the correct country.
They also say that these things cost $8 million each as opposed to $1.5 for a Tomahawk (roughly). Personally I think it is fairer to compare the success rate to Desert Storm rather than now given the level of experience/refinement the US has amassed since then.
Oh come on ,what does it mean they THINK ? Any solid evidence ?
I am not saying it`s impossible to have duds and stuff, all complex military equipment is prone to this, BUT unleass you have clear evidence one must raise the BS flag
they are just cleverly spinning this, you can also say that by not sharing intel with russia, america is aiding ISIS….
they are not spinning anything at all, no sane person takes for good the bs spewed on a daily basis by USA`s propaganda machine
this murad dude follows closely the action
Sweet sweet ECM pods.
Source; https://instagram.com/sashakots/
those ecm pods come in handy in a different type of conflict
the real danger here is manpads, i am more curios if those 30 come with maws, dircm etc
And anyone who gives AA-missile technology to Syrian rebels needs their head examining. Airport security and full cavity searches would no longer cut it.
Well, USA wont deliver them for sure, we all know how farsighted they are…….oh wait
Are you kidding? Wahabbism was created by the CIA especially to destabilize the Russian islamic republics.
Nic
Wahhabism was created by Muhhamad Wahhab in the 1700s, this dude hardly qualifies as a CIA assett.
Now, the fact that later in history they were used by americans to get the russians should be no surprise, their fanaticism was well known.
Where them beloved americans fvucked up was in the foresight department, blowback effect and all