Some amazing F-22 shots from Alaska
More:
http://www.codeonemagazine.com/article.html?item_id=176&sf12987792=1
`Murica ! That picture is Titts !
it shows how the ruskies are wasting their time , slow, fat , draggy , lot of energy lose and not recovered
Do us all a favor and go play on the train tracks
Is that a front access ramp ?
@ yama
Kh-25 & 29 are in the same range
“The radar was actually pretty good and enabled fairly long-range contacts.”
Rather strange since most (all ?) other western pilots didn`t share this view regarding Fulcrums radar.
They praised, HMCS, maneuvrability, T/W ratio etc but NOT radar….
Well, this escalated rather quickly….
Go and then smart **** tell me is this a photo or a painting? Coz I can read it either way; and am intrigued by this ‘B1R before there was a B1R‘ idea
Can someone identify all of them ?
So . . . what you’re saying is that if fighter A is superior to fighter B, then its superiority does not count. A fighter is only superior when its pilots win despite the opposing aircraft being superior.
Thus, if an F-15 shoots down a MiG-21, it doesn’t show the superiority of the F-15, since the F-15 is superior & therefore its superiority is discounted.
Can you clarify this for me, please? Do you really mean that you consider aerial warfare as akin to some sort of handicap race, or a sport such as boxing where opponents are matched against those in the same weight class? Do you think it’s a game?
Anyway let`s break this
“what you’re saying is that if fighter A is superior to fighter B, then its superiority does not count” – if A is 4th and B it`s 3rd – it is superior by default, no contest here, a mere procedure in handling the older type
“A fighter is only superior when its pilots win despite the opposing aircraft being superior.” It`s superior when it handles something belonging, first to the same generation and preferably same class
I wasn`t talking about what is fair or not in warfare.
Just pointing out a huge list of targets that fall in easy prey category for an F-15 and should be put under the category- hardly worth mentioning. Period.
The problem is actually quite simple: a fighter has to kill other aerial targets, and here the rules are not “this generation vs. this one” is allowed and this is unfair as such the quality of a certain type is dismissed. Where do You draw the like in regard to the MiG-29 ? … or even do You want to differ between different lots the F-15, the E-model or a MSIP-II C ?? Even more if the Russians had simply nothing better at hand when the F-15 came out, … why does the Eagle has to wait until a true and justified opponent comes out ? If the opponent is simply not capable to pose a real threat then its simply not the F-15’s problem.
As such – and even if I know what You want to explore with Your question – this tread is completely stupid, useless … it’s like telling the Great White Shark or a Tiger an unfair predator since all small fishes or a deer simply can’t be considered a real threat !
Deino
Yet you fail to point out where I said the F-15 is a bad fighter
You fail to answer straight the second question.
Maybe in your view (intellectually limited) an Air superiority fighter of F-15`s calibre must brag with slamming right and left jets that are decades older in conception and a fraction of a cost compared to the Eagle.
the F-15 is a baaaad fighter since it scored only 13 “worthy to be mentioned” by Your logic victories.
1. Point exactly where I said Eagle is a bad fighter
2. How can OLDER GENERATION Fishbeds and Floggers be considered real threats ? Nevermind Su-22 & 25, various other helicopters etc
Why do I once again have that strange feeling that a Fan-boy of some certain kind do not want accept the facts !
Deino
Obviously you are not the sharpest tool in the box by any stretch of imagination.
I was breaking down the combat record using pure logic, something you sorely miss.
Fact is, out of 100+ victories 13 !! are worth mentioning and considering.
But maybe for your limping intellect Mi-24, Il-76 and grandpa Fishbed are worthy adversaries
You may call the MiG-23 an earlier generation of jet compared to the F-15 – but the MiG barely entered frontline service around 3 years earlier than the American jet. Soviet fighter jets similar in technology and generation to the F-15 – MiG-29, Su-27 were not seen outside the USSR till around 1986 – a whole 10 years after the F-15. It’s hardly surprising that the Syrian AF only flew MiG-21 and MiG-23 against Israel in 1982 – that’s all the Soviets had in their military at that time as well.
The 23 WAS a generation older, let`s keep it real.
In service timing that`s a different story, conception & execution wise they are not in the same group.
Bottom line, the most acclaimed fighter jet for it`s hunting prowess actually has 13 (out of 100 + ) victories worth mentioning.
If we keep cool headed the 9 USAF ones were more than one sided scenarios, in those cases their enemies were badly outnumbered and outgunned plus they took on the little brother from the Cold War dance pairs:
F-16 – MiG-29
F-15 – Su-27
Thx man, I was thinking the description might be in cyrilic
As a side note, I was astonished by the place where they ran the test for teh video. Notice on the printscreen the open road and the cars passing just in front!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]226362[/ATTACH]
Regarding the TVC: @Andrax
Cos(Alpha<10)>0.95 😉
Interesting, can you add the link to that video ?
With the PLAAF J-20 offering similar performance to the PAK-FA. Could China beat out Russia for orders of its 5th Generation Fighter???
Good to hear somebody flown both jets (service versions, of course) and has an indepth knowledge regarding their suite of equipments (ECM, ECCM, AESA, ESM aso) :rolleyes: