dark light

pometablava

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 46 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Saab A-36 a real "what-if" or just fake ? #2602878
    pometablava
    Participant

    I strongly recommend this article in Air Enthusiast about SAAB unbuilt projects

    in reply to: Romanian Supersonic Fighter Projects #2602888
    pometablava
    Participant

    Air Enthusiast is a magazine from Keypublishing (http://www.airenthusiast.com). The people who keeps this forum.

    I’m an “Air Enthusiast” enthusiast but to tell the truth from 2001 onwards I can’t feel that quality (both text and pics) is slightly below past standards. (And it is not only my personal opinion between veteran readers and collectors). Today, my favourite magazine is other.

    But I feel optimistic…unbuilt projects are still present in the contents so go for it!

    in reply to: Experimental heavy bombers #2603167
    pometablava
    Participant
    in reply to: Experimental heavy bombers #2603168
    pometablava
    Participant
    in reply to: Experimental heavy bombers #2603174
    pometablava
    Participant

    Dear Barnowl,

    Heavy bomber design are exclusive from USA and USSR since the 70’s. With the sole exception of an H-6 derivative from China. I get a drawing from http://www.sinodefence.com (I’ll try to get it from my hard disk if you can’t find there)

    Russian Aerospace design story is better known than that from the US.
    You can find Russian Long Range Bombers in Soviet Secret Projects: bombers from 1945 from Tony Buttler and there is a lot of info Tu160 from Red Series and Tu22 from Aerofax. If you can read Russian Language the 2-Vol Bastion Enciclopedia is almost deffinitive. There are several other tittles full of info.
    If you only want pics from internet you can google from “Tupolev” and “Myasischev” entries. I have a quite nice collection of pics from internet.

    US designs are almost impossible to find both in books or internet. Unbuilt designs enthusiats are waiting for this book from Scott Lowther (it will be the equivalent on Tony Buttler masterpieces for this subject)

    http://www.up-ship.com/Book/bomproj.htm

    Antonio

    in reply to: Romanian Supersonic Fighter Projects #2603214
    pometablava
    Participant

    Full information about CAC unbuilt projects along with tons of drawings were published in Air Enthusiast May/June 1996 No.63 page 52 to 63. “From Fisherman’s Bend. CAC Projects, Proposals and Concepts” by Joe Vella.

    in reply to: Aeromarine SeaHunter #2603546
    pometablava
    Participant

    Another intriguing project is from Beriev. A little reference is given in Red Stars Vol 8 but I get a pic from a friend. Which is the operational procedure for a WiG aircraft carrier. In the pic it is not possible to see where the aircraft are carrier or how are they operated. I have no information about the composition of its carrier wing….

    :confused: :confused: :confused:

    in reply to: Romanian Supersonic Fighter Projects #2603553
    pometablava
    Participant

    I’m still looking at my Air Enthusiast collection because I’m sure that a nice IAR-S (one the most impressive of its iterations) line drawing was published there.

    If I can find it I’ll post it here

    in reply to: Romanian Supersonic Fighter Projects #2603556
    pometablava
    Participant

    Dear Gollevainen,

    Thanks to SOC, I have found more info from earlier threads at this forum enough to complement what I already knew. By the way, similarities to some Chinese aircraft designs are astonishing as it is noted in the previous threads!.

    I don’t mind to share info. There is some info on International Air Power Journal. I think it is a clear summary on the project. I think is unfair to show it in the web but if you send me a Private Message with your email address I’ll send you scans for personal use.
    If you are interested on unbuilt projects research please feel free to email me because this is my passion. Everybody is also invited.

    IAR-95 required an engine thrust of 54 kN dry and 91 kN with afterburner. The Chinese WS-9 (licensed RR Spey) was selected.
    One or two (depending on design study) Tumansky R-29-300 turbojet rated at 122kN with afterburner was to be the powerplant of IAR-S.

    IAR-95 technical data :

    Length overall: 14.75 m

    Height overall: 4.95 m

    Wing Span: 8.7 m

    Wing area, gross: 26 m²

    Wing sweep at quarter chord: 35 deg.

    Empty weight: 6800 kg

    Maximum take-off weight: 10000 kg

    Powerplant: 1 WS-9

    IAR-95 ME technical data
    (Despite its designation this was the technology demonstrator for IAR-S)

    Length: 16.0 m

    Wing span: 9.3 m

    Height: 5.45 m

    Wing area: 27.9 m²

    Empty weight: 7,880 kg

    Max T-O weight: 15,200 kg

    Weapons max. load: 3,200 kg

    Powerplant: One Tumansky R-29-300 turbojet rated at 122kN with afterburner

    No data available for the different IAR-S configurations

    I don’t know if never existed more collaborative Roman-Yugoslavian projects besides the IAR-93/J-22. And, as far as I know there was no relation between IAR-S and Novi Avion.

    Antonio

    in reply to: The USS Robin #2070321
    pometablava
    Participant

    I found it!

    Thanks a lot Mark

    Antonio

    in reply to: The USS Robin #2070399
    pometablava
    Participant

    Amazing!!!

    Corsair,
    Can you please type the link here. I would like to read this story

    Thanks a lot

    in reply to: USS Long Beach: is this an unbuilt concept #2076077
    pometablava
    Participant

    http://www.vought.com/heritage/

    Nice web!. Thank you TinWing

    in reply to: Australia and UK DDL proposal #2076239
    pometablava
    Participant

    Pioneer,

    I’d love to see the pic. To post it you only need to select Go Advanced as the option to Post Reply and there you have an option called “manage attachments”

    Could you please send me the pic via email? The address is [email]pometablava@yahoo.es[/email]

    Thank you very much

    in reply to: USS Long Beach: is this an unbuilt concept #2076241
    pometablava
    Participant

    Thanks for the confirmation!

    Now I would like to see the Polaris A2 version. It would have been the most powerful armed surface ship in the World.
    The only ship I know with provision for such a weapon was the Italian cruiser Giussepe Garibaldi after its rebuilding in 1961 but I seriously doubt if nuclear warheads were never carried onboard
    Any extra information?

    in reply to: Royal Navy Type 43 DDG #2078740
    pometablava
    Participant

    Please Wanshan send me a Message with your email and I’ll send you full quality scans

    If anybody is interested in scans feel free to send me message too

    Antonio

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 46 total)