dark light

TempestV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mystery bits, Rudder Trim etc. #935278
    TempestV
    Participant

    Wheel is indeed Vampire trainer. Rudder trim is Mosquito.

    Nice finds.

    Bruce

    The rudder trim is also for a Hornet. Would this be available?

    in reply to: Measured responses please #938368
    TempestV
    Participant

    Really ? Can you name some examples from the past 12 months DC ?

    I’ve only seen a smattering of ownership changes, plus that Tornado cockpit on eBay reduced by 1/3 with still no buyer.

    Dave,

    Change in ownership does not reflect a dying scene. This would probably annoy dealers, but those interested in long term preservation tend to keep improving on what they have, year upon year.

    Every year I’ve been to Newark there have been new types that I never thought I’d see represented.

    Just this past 2 years, there have been:

    Balliol
    Mustang
    Wyvvern
    Meteor
    several Harriers
    Stirling
    King Cobra
    Beagle Pup
    Defiant
    Anson

    Most museums cannot boast this line-up.

    in reply to: Measured responses please #938618
    TempestV
    Participant

    To quote the friend: “Unless the aero boys take a leap of faith and start to join in with other divergent interests then they are doomed to an ever decreasing series of events and their numbers will start to dwindle as the supply of cockpits dries up completely and the owners literally die off!

    I have thought on this for a few days since I first read your post as I was puzzled by the quote shown above.

    I don’t think in the UK there is a problem at all with cockpit ownership/preservation? In fact, every year different and more varied types are being collected, re-constructed, and preserved. If anything, this is expanding year upon year. It is far from dying out.

    As for engaging with the public at displays, this is entirely up to the cockpit owner. Some base their cockpits permanently at museums where the public have greater access. While in the main, most of us keep them at home or in a workshop as it is the only way we can financially or practically engage in aircraft preservation.

    Making the trip to events, several times per year with what are on the whole delicate parts of airframes, is not only a bit of a risk each time, but in many cases a big part of your annual restoration budget! There are some regular events that are well attended every year (Newark’s cockpitfest for example) that provide an annual focal point for the movement, just like Wimbledon does for Tennis.

    Some cockpit owners are very motivated to engage with the public at every event they can attend, as many times per year. This is all credit to them. For others, it is a private hobby. Most of us fall somewhere between the two camps, as time and finances dictate.

    It is great that the military vehicle scene continues to thrive, but it must be remembered that these vehicles on the whole are a lot more durable when rocking up to event after event. Delicate airframes much lesser so.

    in reply to: Whirlwind Fighter Project Updates #956231
    TempestV
    Participant

    That’s a nice piece of scanning. Is this a GOM scan? I had an instument panel scanned recently, and it was surprisingly affordable.

    in reply to: Whitley wing move dates – Norwich to Tilbury #961239
    TempestV
    Participant

    Postponed again – this time due to museum factors. The new date will probably be Sat 21st Sept. i’ll confirm soon. A million apologies to those who have kept weekends free.

    I’ll have to let you know about the 21st nearer to the time.

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #969652
    TempestV
    Participant

    Nice work there John,

    It was good to make these up from an original drawing, but will really help finding the valve block that it supports.

    in reply to: Looking to contact Peter Woods #970292
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi all

    Does anyone here know Peter Woods of the Twyford area? I am trying to contact him with a Chipmunk related question.

    Thanks in advance,

    Ritch

    pm sent

    in reply to: Westland Wyvern Project Thread. #979095
    TempestV
    Participant

    Thanks to the help and co-operation of the Fleet Air Arm Museums curator Dave Morris and Richard Barlow – and a drive down to Somerset, i was able to obtain the correct dimensions for the Wyvern’s instrument panels, using the FAAM Wyvern TF.1.

    Although the instruments used are quite different to the later S.4, the panels are the same size and basic shape. It was then a case of using pictures and reference material to place the correct items in the correct positions. First stage left and right mock ups are nearly complete baring a few missing items, the BFP is in progress.

    Rob

    Hi Rob,

    An excellent start.

    This will be the fist step towards making this!!! 😀

    in reply to: Seafire MB293 is now on the UK Registry #990122
    TempestV
    Participant

    That’s a lot of Seafire there.

    Was this an aircraft dumped over the side of a carrier, or a ditching?

    in reply to: Half-naked display. What's the issue? #990127
    TempestV
    Participant

    I’m with you on this one Bruce,
    I would prefer to see R-Robert fully covered and painted. It is the best way to conserve the airframe too.

    To educate others on the structure, they have a complete forward fuselage that can fulfil the role of a partially covered display.

    in reply to: RAFM Wellington #991103
    TempestV
    Participant

    But I understand that it was built with the front turret, only removed on conversion some years later.

    Which is just the same as a Meteor NF.11 being built as a night fighter, then converted later in its life to a TT.20 Target Tug.

    Those converted are still designated by their later official mod. state, even if painted up to represent the former.

    The bonus for us all with a museum like the RAFM, is they have the resources and will to display some types over time in different guises.

    in reply to: RAFM Wellington #991901
    TempestV
    Participant

    It just seems to me that taking this aircraft away from representing a wartime Bomber Command aircraft is yet another of these revisionist, apologist moves to appease the vocal minority who think Bomber Command were evil. It stinks. The Wellington was the backbone of the RAF through the first half of the war, flown by those who fought for our freedom. Representing the Wellington as a mere trainer from the postwar period means so much less. If there were fifty of them around in museums it wouldn’t matter. This is the only complete example though.

    Apart from the other complete example R-Robert!

    in reply to: RAFM Wellington #991956
    TempestV
    Participant

    Reference #10

    It was ordered and built as a bomber and only converted to a navigation trainer in 1948

    You are quite right, so I’ll change my statement to:

    I support the RAFM in restoring their Wellington as the Trainer is was converted to for its short operational life.

    This still doesn’t alter the fact that commemorating post-war training variants is less relevant than operationally painted ones.

    in reply to: RAFM Wellington #992113
    TempestV
    Participant

    I support the RAFM in restoring their Wellington as the Trainer is was built as. It has been displayed as a bomber for a number of years now, so why not? There is nothing to stop it from being converted back again in the future. The RAFM have taken a view to commemorate all of its roles and uses, and the training of crew is just as valid.

    I also think the TT5 Tempest re-paint/conversion was an inspired restoration too.

    It won’t be everyone’s cup-of-tea, but at least we can see R-Robert at Brooklands as well.

    TempestV
    Participant

    The static Hurricane project (details below) has been going almost 3 decades and is ‘stalled’ (pardon the pun). The last major part required is a centre section. Particularly the spars.

    If anyone has any leads on such parts, please let me know.

    It was covered in Paul Blackah’s excellent Haynes Manual. The project is a static dedicated to the designers, builders, pilots and groundcrew. It is a complex composite using parts from over 65 different Hurricanes – based on the identity of P3554 (uses cockpit controls and some structural parts from P3554). Parts have come from aircraft shot down in the Battle of Britain/WW2, scrapyards and ‘hand me downs’ from flyers. The cocpit is 85% original WW2 material.

    Hi Tony,

    Does Graham Adlam still have much of his Hurricane frame project left?

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 1,411 total)