dark light

TempestV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Stirling V Lancaster. Which was better designed? #947329
    TempestV
    Participant

    … having seen how they are built, I consider the Stirling to be a much better designed vessel for the high seas! 😀

    in reply to: Cockpit canopy covers, anyone? #953264
    TempestV
    Participant

    Just bringing this topic to a close, the shed seems to have given up the last of its covers. The final score was:-

    Canopy cover for Sunderland
    Canopy cover for Vampire (single seat) (already with new owners)
    Canopy cover for Harvard
    Canopy cover for Wellington
    Canopy cover for Meteor F3/4
    Canopy cover for Mosquito NF38
    Nose covers for Mosquito NF30 and B35, PR34
    Rear Turret cover for Sunderland
    Engine and spinner cover for Harvard
    Engine cover (port) for Mosquito
    Spinner cover for Balliol
    Spinner cover for Anson
    Tail wheel cover for Balliol
    Cover for observation blister in roof of Dakota
    Main wheel covers for Mosquito
    Prop blade covers for Brigand (these are for single blades)
    Prop blade cover for Tiger Moth (just the one, two needed per prop!)

    It’s a pity that so many of them are for extinct/near extinct types. Still, some may find alternative uses yet!

    Hi Alan,

    Please could you e-mail me a photo/dimensions for the Meteor F3/4 cover?

    thanks

    in reply to: List of surviving manufacturing drawings ? #954236
    TempestV
    Participant

    Great idea!

    DH Hornet and Sea Hornet ~56-60% remaining in BAE archives.

    …. and a large number of these much closer to home! 😉

    in reply to: Hampden Cockpit Reconstruction #954238
    TempestV
    Participant

    Great work Cees and Lex,

    This is a really nice section of a Hampden. I intend for the Meteor F4 panel to be displayed in exactly the same way in about 1yrs time. Mine will be from the cockpit floor to the top of the windscreen.

    My second Sea Hornet PR22 instrument panels will be displayed in a similar fasion, but within a wooden “slice” of airframe. When you have limited space, at home or in a museum, its a really good type of display to put together.

    in reply to: Cockpit canopy covers, anyone? #971913
    TempestV
    Participant

    Thank you Alan

    Snug as a….

    in reply to: Short Sturgeon – First and second Prototype #971918
    TempestV
    Participant

    Just for fun!

    This Hornet F3 appeared at the same race event as the Prototype Sturgeon 🙂

    in reply to: Mk 4B or 4E gun sight #978498
    TempestV
    Participant

    Can anyone recommend a good source for photos of these types of sight ?

    I believe that the 4B was fitted in early marks of the Westland Wyvern and the 4E in the Mk 4. Is that correct ?

    This is a MK4B GGS. They are very similar to the later MK4E, and I suspect that most of the “B’s” were converted to “E’s”, as the former are very hard to find now.

    The only difference I can see is on the left side of the body, the lever mechanism is different, and there is an additional rotary selector is in the same place on the later “E” model.

    The Mark 4B was fitted to the first Vampire mks 1&3, Hornet mks 1&3, and Meteor mks 3&4 to name but a few. Later marks of the same aircraft got the MK4E as an upgrade. Hope this helps.

    in reply to: Cockpit canopy covers, anyone? #981918
    TempestV
    Participant

    These alone are amazing finds. Good work Alan,

    in reply to: Short Sturgeon – First and second Prototype #988593
    TempestV
    Participant

    Many thanks Rob

    Yes, you are absolutely right. We are still not sure but could be the De Havilland Hornet and sea Hortnet.

    My father is also eager to build the Hadrian and he is thinking about starting with the Waco CG-13As. Two of this were used at the Airborne Forces Experimental Establishment for trials in 1945.

    Cheers
    Santiago

    Well if you do want to do these, you know where to ask for help! 😀

    in reply to: Whirlwind Fighter Project Updates #997460
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Dave…

    It’s Gunnar whose making the progress, we just feed him what information our research has turned up and he turns it into Gold, sort of like a high tech Rumpelstiltskin… 😉

    But its not all sweetness & light as there are some areas that as yet we just don’t know anything about and we’re not in the guessing game, so those will have to stay blank until information or actual structure can be viewed.

    You know only to well yourself how difficult it is to back engineer these projects…

    Indeed, and if you keep on chipping away at the areas you do know, then the blanks soon disappear.

    in reply to: Short Sturgeon – First and second Prototype #997657
    TempestV
    Participant

    Thanks for that David. Never seen one with the racing number on show on top of the port wing before.

    And totally agree about what an amazing spectacle and sound those races would of been.
    To quote from the Sturgeon book i mentioned, “the event was won by Peter Lawrence in the Blackburn Firebrand. The Sturgeon recorded the average speed of 295 mph and at the end of the first lap it was in second place, smoking and noisy but doing well, but it was eventually overhauled by the Spitfire and (possibly) by the de havilland Hornet”. 😎

    Rob

    The de Havilland Aircraft Company were taking their entry very seriously I believe, as the F3 used was the specifically fitted with the uprated Merlin 134/5 engines, which were later used on the Sea Hornets.

    in reply to: Whirlwind Fighter Project Updates #997662
    TempestV
    Participant

    Another update on the CAD model from Gunnar, internal construction has started on the centre fuselage and tail plane assemblies…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adcvjVGgRAk&feature=youtu.be

    You are making great progress with this.

    Re-creating the complete airframe in CAD first is the first major milestone. It should make the subsequent build more straightforward, and portray a professional approach to the project.

    Well done to all involved.

    in reply to: Short Sturgeon – First and second Prototype #998851
    TempestV
    Participant

    Its a shame that there are’nt colour images around showing this particular race meet. I bet it was a colourful sight.

    The Hornet entered into this race was PX368. It was in overall silver dope, with yellow and roundal blue bands on the rear fuselage. Race number 84 in black on a white circle. The only area of colour difficulty we have on this is the spinners – they look gloss black or red.

    in reply to: Short Sturgeon – First and second Prototype #999068
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Rob,

    This is an enlarged extract from a larger photo that Mark12 kindly passed to me this week (as it also contains a Hornet).

    This is the same “racing prototype” a/c shown from above.

    in reply to: Your Favourite Control Column Stick/Yoke/Grip! #1002893
    TempestV
    Participant

    In support of Ian’s ‘lust’ for objects, I think I have to on this occasion at least, side with DC’s Hornet grip as possibly the, (in my opinion) most ‘holy grail’ of (British) grips? There must be one out there somewhere????

    GYD

    You will laugh… I have too! I only found out about the German auction house via this forum, about 1 year after it had happened. The Hornet grip was listed with a late 40’s RAF pilots flying helmet too, so possibly the personal effects of the original pilot?? If my memory serves me correctly, it sold for about EUR250.

    The flying helmet was probably worth that alone! 🙁

    Still, on the positive side that establishes a value for the grip!

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 1,411 total)