dark light

TempestV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whitley Parts #834180
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Elliot,

    Do you have any progress updates to share please?

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay 2018 #771827
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi GYD,
    Wow! Who’d ever have thought a NOS Mosquito throttle box would remain in its box all these years.

    in reply to: North Weald Diary 2018 #773740
    TempestV
    Participant

    Has this Gnat F1 flown yet following restoration, or is it still undergoing checks?
    Its really significant that a fighter variant Gnat is flight worthy again in the UK.
    Can’t wait to see it.

    TempestV
    Participant

    Yes, it’ll be sad to see it go, especially as it’s been in use for so long.
    I got to visit it 2-3 years ago, taking some Air Cadets there.

    in reply to: Help wanted – Aircraft Plywood Specification 6V3B #780959
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Vega ECM,

    So for your specific application depending on the three figure number that follows the 6.V.3B prefix, your wood will either be Grade B Beech ply between 1/32″ and 3/4″ thick, or Grade B Birch multi-ply between 1/4″ and 3/4″ thick.

    in reply to: Help wanted – Aircraft Plywood Specification 6V3B #780978
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi ericmunk,

    Sorry, I don’t know if the Grades correspond to the Lloyd’s GL I and II ratings.

    in reply to: Help wanted – Aircraft Plywood Specification 6V3B #781046
    TempestV
    Participant

    Does anyone know what type of wood is used in plywood specification 6V3B?

    I believe this a British Spec from 1930 – 40’s possibly earlier.

    Any help or leads greatly appreciated.

    Hello Vega ECM,
    According to my Molesworth’s Aeronautical Engineers pocket book, dated 1947:

    6.V.3B can be translated as:

    6V3 is high strength plywood for aircraft.
    B is grade B.

    To get the specific type, thickness and ply, you will need an additional number, eg:

    V3/140 is birch, 3/32″, 3 ply, grade A.

    If you have additional numbers, I can look them up on the chart.

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2018 What Have You Seen? #784118
    TempestV
    Participant

    Single engined Merlin something over Chelmsford about 4:30pm today, heading west.

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2018 What Have You Seen? #785825
    TempestV
    Participant

    Sally B straight over my house at 17:10 today, Little Waltham ? @ low level.

    in reply to: Hurricane #795798
    TempestV
    Participant

    I saw this too slightly earlier, heading north over Broomfield, Essex.

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2018 What Have You Seen? #796686
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hurricane (most likely) or P40 heading north over Broomfield, Essex at 13:30 today.

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2018 What Have You Seen? #768764
    TempestV
    Participant

    I did see the BBMF holding and the rest of the flypast apart from the rotor stuff

    The rotor stuff held around Lambourne End/Stapleford area from my view point.

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2018 What Have You Seen? #768884
    TempestV
    Participant

    …. there I was minding my own business looking in a northerly direction, on a hill at the Weald Country park in mid-Essex at lunchtime, when without so much as a “by your leave” 100 noisy aircraft should fly over in formation.

    in reply to: Update from 'The People's Mosquito' #772704
    TempestV
    Participant

    Glynn Powell did the first set of wings if I recall correctly so he probably still has his own jigs, there is also nothing to stop Avspecs building a jig from the centre section they currently have if not done already to guarantee availability of more wings, very surprised that Aerowood closed up when they had such a niche market for Mossy wings, time will tell I guess!!

    I think Corin worked together with Glynn on the first wing. It’s an impressive achievement by these guys, and all involved.

    in reply to: Update from 'The People's Mosquito' #772734
    TempestV
    Participant

    Folk do get a little focussed on the notion of “merging” projects or organisations.

    Geographically, commercially, or personally it just doesn’t work sometimes… And yet other times it does work out.

    Many projects and organisations work together. They don’t have to publish it.

    Surely we have far too many companies restoring Spitfires in the world. Maybe they should all be merged to ensure they succeed. ???

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,411 total)