Those of you who have seen my article on the Meteor FR.9 in recent Flypasts enjoyed it I hope. Now I’m wanting to focus on another Meteor variant: the NF.13; which, I know, served with just two RAF Squadrons: nos 39 and 219. In the space available in a magazine article I am inclined to narrow my focus to try to do justice to the subject.
In this respect I am also asking if there is anyone who was involved with the NF.13 in both these squadrons who would be prepared to share memories and information with me.
I’ll look forward to hearing from you.
Incidentally, thanks to those who kindly contributed to my recent Venom Night Fighter thread. The draft of the article is well under way……………and what an interesting and enlightening topic that was!
Hi Lindoug,
pm sent!
We had one in the Bill Miles collection at North Weald in the late 70’s/early 80’s. I don’t know where this one ended up when the collection was dispersed?
There was also a BoB film hurricane displayed outside a pub at Allen’s Green Hertfordshire in the 70’s. Could this be one and the same?
Indeed, they were very convincing visual replicas I recall.
Hi Chaps and chapesses
The Stirling Aircraft Project jhas finally moved from RAF Wyton although t too 2 full days and 6 lorry loads to transport all of the kit and artefacts. It’ll probably take another 1-2 weekends to sort out where it all now needs to go and remember where it all is :rolleyes:
hopefully though we’ll soon be back to work and making new parts and assemblies to post on here
cheers
John
ps I’m going for a lie down now :diablo:
Good work Stirling team!
Well, I can answer for the 6 exhaust ports into 5 question.
On the Mosquito and Hornet the rearmost pair of exhaust ports were bifuricated into a single pipe, as if the last pipe was set at the same angle as the rest, it would have clashed with the radiator intake.
For the mix/match types of exhaust, it may be for several reasons:
– Flame dampers on nightfighters/bombers should have been fitted on both sides, but I have seen post-war Sea Hornet Night fighters with only the inboard flame dampers fitted to preserve the pilots night vision, I’m told!
– only a limited number of a/c sets were available?
Hi Mark,
Just to illustrate my point. I have taken one of your photos, and simply made it a b/w image.
If you didn’t know which colour they were all to start with, what colour would you interperate these to be?
I realise what you are saying about the angles of the panels in relation to each other, but compare to the black (that we know) fittings and controls in the angled portion of the main panel itself.
It would seem odd to be painted differently to black as Elliot and yourself say though.
Hi pagen01,
The black fittings mounted on this panel will always appear darker, because they are made of a different material with a different surface finish.
These fittings, predominantly made of bakelite are a very deep black in colour in comparison with sprayed matt black. Also, many of these bakelite fittings are rounded bezels, which will reflect the light back to the viewpoint in a very different way too.
As I suggested, try an experiment to photograph some instrument panels angled differently to each other. I think too much can be read into black and white shaded photo’s. Light and shade plays too many tricks.
Black, black, black!
I think it should be Choice 1 – overall black, and below I give my reasoning.
– The official direction for aircraft instrument panels of that era was black.
– Although the blind flying panel obviously looks black in comparison, the other two panels highlighted are at different angles to the viewer (camera lens) so will reflect the flash differently, making them appear lighter, or a different colour.
I definitely think the lighter panels only appear so, because of how they are reflecting the light.
Try setting up 3 identical black panels at the same relative angles to each other, as those shown on this Whitley image, and you will produce exactly the same affect if you photograph it with a flash camera.
Empire of the Clouds
I’ve just read this book over Christmas. This is really good – Very well written, and one I couldn’t put down.
….My only gripe is that in such a well reserched book, a line-up of Vampire F.3’s is incorrectly captioned as being F.1’s.
Well done Gents, proceeds clearly going to a worthy cause there. Obviously there are a few extra copies out and about, but ‘not a lot’ 🙂
Only if you buy the D+V book directly from me! 😀
Otherwise, the publisher get’s the lot…
… that elusive Euromillions win!
I could therefore give up the day job and build an airworthy DH Hornet for myself.
:D:D:D
No comment sir, except to say I was not physically there and and am now the wrong side of 35!
:D:D:D
Peter. Although I was there and watched the whole thing I have no idea who the lucky bidder was ? he was a youngish man early 30’s maybe (but at my age almost everyone looks young !) :diablo:
Keith.
Could that be a Mr.Elliott Smock???
I too bought a Vixen, and although I havent put knife to plastic, the raw material looks very good.
Not Tamiya standards, though perhaps that isnt all bad!
Bruce
Rather peversely, a kit can be too perfect. I’ve made a MkI Spitfire and FBIV Mosquito in the past made by Tamiya, and they literally fell together out of the box. There was no fettling required, and it somehow left the whole experience lacking. 😀
… and a Typhoon throttle box, P47 canopy metalwork, and sundry Proctor and Magister parts.
aeroflight.co.uk says that this is a mock-up..
Real aeroplane, faired over turret location.