dark light

TempestV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Miles Master canopy #1102029
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi David , i certainly will persevere, only problem is the brigand at kemble is full of asbestos,

    Oh, I didn’t realise that. However, companies work with this stuff all the time. I’m sure that if you took adequate precautions with a breathing mask, etc. you could ask to measure up the cockpit for 15 minutes.

    in reply to: Miles Master canopy #1102369
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Merkle,

    My recommendation would be to persevere with the Brigand. If you can get access to the fuselage in the South West, you should be able to make accurate measurements of the cockpit structure around the instrument panel, and possibly even the instrument panel mounts. You can use this information to make an accurate drawing of the instrument panel, using the pilots notes photos/AP drawings as a basis.

    A Brigand panel would be a nice post war missing type to tackle. It probably used non-Luminous gauges, and would be easier to populate compared with a WW2 era panels. Have you got a good photo of the panel you could post here?

    Good luck,

    in reply to: Whitley Parts #1105520
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Elliott,

    Thats positive news that the centre section is fairly straight.

    in reply to: Whitley Parts #1106684
    TempestV
    Participant

    Good to see some progress on this centre section Elliott.

    Its going to be a real task jigging this to know what is straight. I can see that the new steel L-Brackets bolted through the wing lugs aren’t actually welded onto the frame yet.

    in reply to: Short Stirling #1107928
    TempestV
    Participant

    Stirling Project

    There is a good core team of active members; the Project Manager, two draftsmen, a 3D CAD designer and a rigger, plus many others in support. All of which are involved in sourcing of parts, restoration, and new manufacture of components too. Many have followed this thread with interest.

    In an ideal world, to recreate or restore a type you need a straight airframe and +100’s of good dimensioned drawings. For the Stirling neither exists, so the next best thing is to collect together original components, drawings and photos, with the initial intention of making an accurate forward fuselage.

    There is a lot of talk in this thread about “missing links”, “data plate specials”, “gallant efforts”, “preserving originality”, etc. In simple terms though, if people want to see a substantial part of a Stirling again, then this project is the best way to go about it:

    In essence, the way you go about accurately recreating something from scratch is to gather together the best available information. There are some (but not many) Shorts drawings available. Every known piece of airframe has to be measured, collected, or photographed for reference. Production line photos can be useful too if they show enough structural detail, inside and out. The Stirling Project has been going for 10+ years, and it has taken much of this time for the draftsmen to measure, refine and calculate relatively accurate dimensions for key parts of the fuselage, and has seen members travel throughout Europe to find parts. Over the same period, others have been restoring and making original parts such as the turret, and flight deck fittings.

    The Project is now at the stage where good confidence in the accuracy of the 2D drawings, has been proven by myself using this data to create a full size 3D model of the forward fuselage on CAD. A couple of tricky areas ahead, and below of the windscreen are just coming together now, but once this area is defined, then we can manufacture the jig required to assemble the fuselage within. While from the outside, progress may appear pedestrian, it is important to get everything to fit together on paper, as making mistakes in jigs or incorrect fuselage sections can soon become a costly excercise.

    Clearly this will be a new-build, but in its build we will be preserving the original construction methods used by Shorts for this type, using the correct materials, and processes too. Even the jig for the fuselage will emulate the same shape and principals. There are a substantial amount of original parts that will be fitted to the forward fuselage: Turret, flight deck equipment and controls, seats, radios, escape hatch, DV windows, etc. All of which were previously dispersed in collections, crash sites, or store rooms, so collecting them together into one accurately manufactured assembly, is surely the best way forward.

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #1109189
    TempestV
    Participant

    Good to see the list of items diminishes.

    What’s the plan for the construction of the cockpit itself? Forming frames or building a jig?
    Peter Howell mailed me that he needed some dimensions and was going to send a drawing, but I haven’t received anything yet.

    Cheers
    Cees

    Hi Cees,

    The CAD model will have to be frozen at some point to allow planning, procurement of materials, and construction of the jig. This process could take about 6 months if all goes to plan, but a few dimensions still need to be defined better to get to this stage.

    Beyond this, the intention is to correctly build a forward fuselage in aluminium, and then populate it with all of the components, flight deck, and turret that the project have been collecting and restoring over the past 10 years.

    in reply to: Elgin scrapyard revisited #1109233
    TempestV
    Participant

    Wish I’d bought the Sea Fury cockpit (seat, walls, instruments, controls, windshield etc) that was there just a few years ago…

    If you didn’t, then I wonder who did then? It’s amazing to think that people don’t want to share rare projects like this with others.

    Unless, its been built into a Typhoon or Tempest of course.

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum Briefing #1110447
    TempestV
    Participant

    Newark thank you!

    For my first jumble as a seller, I had a good experience.

    Thanks to Newark for hosting this event. I hope it continues to grow and prosper over the years. It is nicely central in England as a whole.

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #1110458
    TempestV
    Participant

    Did you make any additions to the collection on Saturday? 😀

    The trailing aerial/winch and RF unit were the main aquisitions.

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #1110465
    TempestV
    Participant

    Cor, your gopher has been busy…. 😀

    in reply to: Film of dH Hornets.. #1113845
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Merkle,

    These films are nice, aren’t they. Up until a few years ago, you could buy the original higher quality versions from British Pathe, but they seem to have stopped doing it now.

    Many thanks,

    in reply to: A Question for Mosquito Experts, ie Bruce! #1119106
    TempestV
    Participant

    The Hornet radiator and oil cooler numbers are:

    in reply to: Elgin scrapyard revisited #1120293
    TempestV
    Participant
    in reply to: Elgin scrapyard revisited #1120304
    TempestV
    Participant

    “They were mainly made of peeling wood laminate, complete with gunsights, instruments, controls, and Bakelite seat pans with straps still attached.”

    Sounds really interesting. They could have been vampire/venom/Sea Hornet judging by the description. Did you get any photo’s at the time?

    in reply to: Elgin scrapyard revisited #1120371
    TempestV
    Participant

    I wonder if there is a Sea Hornet under all of that stuff? :diablo:

    Lets hope so! 😀

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,411 total)