……Am I the only one to see the irony in this statement seen on a recent ebay listing for a Mosquito clock. :rolleyes:
“This one was believed to have been rescued from a downed 1941 De Havilland Mosquito. It appears it was last serviced in 1953 but still runs well.”
The later dH 103Hornet was withdrawn owing to delamination when operating in the humid Far East.
Kurt
The type of flying they did was actually the key factor – very frequent diving at low level, pulling excessive G’s. Most of these Hornets were at the end of their useful lives anyway, being up to 7 years old.
Yes, heat and humidity didn’t help, but this was not the key failure mode. By the time Hornets were deployed in Malaya, special UV coatings had been developed for the fabric to keep structural temperatures down.
If someone is going to fly a mosquito again, I fully recommend that a fuselage/wing is new-build. Two examples are: FB26 KA114 and T43 NZ2308.
There are a lot of forces going through an airframe – bending, twisting, shearing for example. I for one, would want to fly in an aircraft with a newly bonded structure made of new wood.
Excellent show as usual.
Highlight for me was Sea Fury T.20 WG655 being flown as the “Joker” during the Balbo. From the ground there appeared to be no difference in its performance between the previous years Bearcat. Both types really highlight the pinnacle of piston powered design.
Can’t wait ’till next year! 😀
Thanks for your replies.
Is Kynoch a manufacturers name then?
.303 shell cases found on Walton on the Naze beach
These are the .303 shell cases I found on Walton on the Naze beach in the early 80’s.
I have written the visible text in the image.
Can these be dated from this to a particular mark of bullet?
Are they spent shells from an aircraft, or equally could they be from a soldiers rifle?
Hi Me-109
For de Havilland aircraft CE in the part number indicates that this part would be from the engine controls.
CE1 = Control Engines.
Is this any help to you?
Were they wearing the standard flap holster or the cut away tankers one?
Didn’t the Venoms have bang seats though?
As such it might not be such an issue with vacating the aircraft as with trying to get out of a tumbling or whatever piston fighter and getting caught by something you had on. I know how awkward it is wearing a belt n holster just driving a WW2 Jeep or light armoured car let alone wearing one in the confines of a cramped cockpit:eek: That’s why they devised the armoured tankers holster and long strap belt, although that presented another set of problems and wasn’t well liked by armoured troops either, although the cut away holster was.Again, I’d never say never.
As Mark said – see photo.
Apart from those cockpits clearly transported on their own trailers I wonder if anyone can share photographs of some of the others being transported or unloaded. How do people moving more than one cockpit do this? eg a Scimitar, Sea Vixen and Hunter!!!!!
They fall into four categories!
1/ Car boot.
2/ Car Trailers.
3/ Van with/without tail-lift.
4/ Flat-bed Lorry with winch or hy-ab.
All four are usually accompanied by a lot of grunting and swearing. 😀
Good find Tony!
Just shows that getting to the Aero-boot first can pay off. 😀
Sorry I can’t ID it for you.
It was good to meet you on saturday,did i mention i have a windscreen thought to be from a Wyvern
Hello Bamel,
Is there any chance you could post a photo of your windscreen here please?
many thanks,
Stuart,
I think it was Malcolm Goosey.
Tony Collins won everything as far as I can remember! Deservedly so. 😀
Also, the Lightning between hangar 1 and 2. Absolutely beautiful inside and out.
I had a fantastic weekend, and thanks to everyone who made the event possible. The standards of the cockpits keeps going up every year, and I think for overall atmosphere, weather, and general mix of types, this has to rate as the best one to date…. long may it continue.
Vampire history correction
Hi Matt,
I have taken a look at the Vampire Preservation Group’s website, and like the overall presentation of it, however I would like to correct some of the Vampire History shown. This paragraph describing the NF.10 design is not correct, and has been often quoted unfortunately.
The next version was the two-seater NF10, adapted from the basic design by grafting the Mosquito’s night-fighter ‘bull’ nose onto the smaller Vampire fuselage pod.
The reality is that de Havilland saw the oportunity to design a new two seat fuselage “pod” that could be used as the basis for both a radar equiped night fighter, or trainer. There is no grafting from one type to another, simply a new fuselage to house the required equipment. This new fuselage was mated to the strengthened clipped wings from the FB.5, providing the core of the new type.
I am very familiar with the construction of the vampire and mosquito airframes, and can confirm there is no commonality in the wooden cockpit primary structure used.
Also, it would be interesting to see a little more history on the Goblin engine too as this was a very significant design for DH right from the start. So much so, that the first Meteor to fly did so with an early version of these instead of the Rover engines it should have, because they were underpowered!
Mk 4B Gyro gunsite wanted
Hello,
Ahead of Newark this coming weekend, if anyone has a Mk 4B Gyro gunsite available for sale/swap, you would really be helping the Hornet cockpit progress.
This mark was also used on Meteors and Sea Furies.
Please come and see me on the day if you can assist, or alternatively drop me an e-mail.
Thanks in advance,
Any Sea Hornets lost off Malta??? I don’t think the wood would fair too well though.