dark light

TempestV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How many types have been lost? #1190389
    TempestV
    Participant

    Not quite a true wartime type, but the Hornet is such a gorgeous design I’ve got to cite it anyway; and didn’t the prototype fly before war’s end?

    S.

    Yes, the first flights were made in July 1944, nearly 1 year before the end of WW2. It was designed as a long range fighter for the pacific theatre, and was planned to be in Squadrons for the end of 1945. It was on track to achieve this, but fortunately for all concerned, the war ended sooner, and the development of the Hornet was eased off a little allowing it into Squadron use by May 1946 in the UK.

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1197690
    TempestV
    Participant

    The ‘190 looks good.

    So how does it work then? Can a legitimately registered type in Germany, normally operated from a German airfield, fly to the UK for an overnight stay, and make an airshow apperance (even if it is a flyby)?

    Does CAA type approval only apply to owner/operated UK based stuff?

    in reply to: International Cockpit Club #1198803
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Mark,

    New name and Logo?

    Men in sheds has already been taken! :p

    in reply to: Brunty Guppy Whoops #1203331
    TempestV
    Participant

    I guess the Guppy would be a little hard to transport to cockpitfest one day, should the axe ever fall on it? :D:D:D

    So best make sure it stays in one piece!!!

    in reply to: International Cockpit Club #1203357
    TempestV
    Participant

    Firstly, I’d like to thank Mark G for maintaining the ICC website for so long single handedly. He has created and maintained a focal point for all of our hobbies.

    I became aware of the website around 2003. By the very nature of cockpit ownership, they are often privately owned projects, not usually on public display, and in several cases not showcased in the magazines we read. So having the ICC website and just embarking on my first Aerojumbles and starting to build parts of my project, it gave me a good place to meet owners of other projects through, and raise my awareness to others good work.

    I would like to see the cockpitfest coverage (past and present) kept in some form on the internet, and also a sales/wants/suppliers section.

    Everyone has expressed some good views and support here, but personally, I don’t think the web needs another forum as I know how much effort it takes to maintain one.

    in reply to: Why Dakota? (The origin of aircraft names in general now) #1208940
    TempestV
    Participant

    There’s always one!

    Take the Grumman Wildcat, in RN service it became the Martlett.

    It already had a perfectly good name.

    And there didn’t seem to be a logical pattern to follow as the next US type used was the Corsair, which retained its name.

    in reply to: Any Merlins left for a speed record ? #1211249
    TempestV
    Participant

    .
    I thought the current land speed record was held by an Atar jet engined “car” from Australia?
    regards

    Mark Pilkington

    Err, no don’t you mean the Thruss SSC supersonic car??

    in reply to: Can anyone ID this seat? #1211374
    TempestV
    Participant

    Looks more like a Firefly seat to me

    The Firefly, Gannet, and Early vampires among others used the same seat design.

    in reply to: Can anyone ID this seat? #1212479
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi A79-RAAFVampire

    Could this seat of yous be a rear gunners seat from someting like a Beaufighter/Beaufort?

    in reply to: Can anyone ID this seat? #1212494
    TempestV
    Participant

    The early vampires had a seat like this:

    in reply to: Re Engined Radials #1216526
    TempestV
    Participant

    No problem David. I just hope de Havilland Support are still around to help with approval when the Hornet is ready to fly!!

    yeah, that’ll look great with a couple of Pratt & Whitney radials up front! 😀

    in reply to: Re Engined Radials #1216533
    TempestV
    Participant

    David, read my note #7 in this thread and that gives you the process. It’s always easier and cheaper if somebody has done it before you and I guess the Buchons are covered by the work done for the B of B movie if not by the re-imports in later years.

    Thanks Ozplane, I’ll put my reading glasses on next time! 😀

    in reply to: Re Engined Radials #1216545
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi David, sorry for not giving credit where credit is due, after all it is your initial query which sparked off this whole thread.

    Kind regards

    Mark

    Hi Mark,

    That’s no problem, I’m just interested, as yourself in the future of seeing a lot of non-Merlin powered types continuing to fly in the UK.

    Here’s a couple of examples:

    – German Storch can be powered by a german engine.
    – post war french built storch can be powered by an argus engine.

    – Me109 with a DB engine
    – post war Buchon with a Merlin.

    Although these are individually very similar looking aircraft, I guess the alternative powerplants, systems, and aerodynamics make each different types. So to achieve the same approval today to put X engine into Y airframe, would this mean this sort of change would need a new type approval? I just wonder if a CAA process is available for this, and if so, is it just hindered by the lack of capital required to pay for a full test program by the potential owner?

    in reply to: Re Engined Radials #1217056
    TempestV
    Participant

    “Without drifting this thread into “re-fitting” another radial into this airframe type thread, if an aircraft were to have an alternative type of powerplant fitted, in the UK would this effectively become a new type, and would it need type approval accordingly? Is there a process that exists that would cover this here?

    For example in the world of light avaition, a particular airframe can support various types/makes of engines. If an an engine has similar torque + power output, revvs, adaptable systems, and is compatible with the sort of flight envelope originally intended for a type, can this also be substituted for another?”

    Hello Mark,

    Actually these two paragraphs you quote, were my question, not David Burke’s if you re-read the previous thread. However, as you say I believe it is a valid question to ask. We face the prospect of having plenty of ground-hogging Sea Fury’s, Tempest II’s, Walrus, etc. in the UK otherwise.

    in reply to: Shoreham's JU 88 Cockpit #1219847
    TempestV
    Participant

    What an excellent exhibit. Was this in a Norwegan museum previously?

    No wonder it was called a fast bomber, as it has a very slender section, narrower even than the mosquito of a similar size, I estimate.

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,411 total)