dark light

TempestV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: HURRICANE R4118 ORIGINAL or REPRO? #1313861
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Captain Slow

    “Does anyone know if he finished it or where it ended up would have needed more room for the wings etc.”

    I think this one made its way to Hawker Restorations in due course as well, and will become a flyer too.

    in reply to: HURRICANE R4118 ORIGINAL or REPRO? #1315177
    TempestV
    Participant

    Its a shame that because of the provenance attached to a lot of stored aircraft parts that have been replaced during restoration, that these aren’t released into the hands of static aircraft builders/restorers. In time when said flying aircraft finishes its flying life, then maybe these parts may become available? I wonder if a disclaimer could be signed by both parties?

    In the case of R4118, I think it is a magnificent piece of work. A well documented and substantially complete airframe went into a workshop, and a flying aircraft left the workshop. It has continuity. The fact of the matter is if we want to see these aircraft flying things have to be re-newed.

    There are far greater examples of tenuous data-plate “restorations” out there, but it matters not to me, as a correctly made Spitfire/Hurricane is a fine piece of engineering, that evokes a range of emotions when one sees or hears one.

    in reply to: Newbie needs Help with Westland Scout parts #1317789
    TempestV
    Participant

    I know someone with a Westland Wasp who may have a few spares. I would suspect there is an amount of commonality?

    E-mail me for details.

    [email]dcollins103@hotmail.com[/email]

    TempestV
    Participant

    second windscreen looks to be DH Hornet …..just my two cents 😮

    Hello ausflyboy

    As I said in the original thread, the second screen is the correct profile for a hornet, but the overall size is too small. I have checked this against the part drawing.

    in reply to: Anyone into microlights? #434058
    TempestV
    Participant

    Spotted on the Newark website.

    “Microlight collection expanded

    An Eipper Aircraft Inc Quicksilver MX microlight has recently been donated to the museum and was delivered on December 15, 2007…”

    More here …. http://www.newarkairmuseum.org/news.php .. if you scroll down the page!

    Yes I am! Newarks, VJ microlight was flown by my friend David Cook. Microlights, I love’em – Real seat of your pants flying!

    in reply to: A different kind of quiz!!! #1244504
    TempestV
    Participant

    3: Mosquito Fighter/trainer

    in reply to: What would be the ultimate find?? #1247999
    TempestV
    Participant

    … short of a complete DH Hornet turning up in a barn :rolleyes:

    A prize find would be a Hornet windscreen casting, canopy, and nose cone!

    Dear Santa…. Please could I have… 😀

    in reply to: Jet engines to the Soviet Union #1250373
    TempestV
    Participant

    Spitfire/Hurricane, Lancaster/Halifax, Corsair/Hellcat, B-17/B-24 – one seems to stoke interest and gets attention, one is perhaps an “also ran”

    I’m not sure the Meteor F.1 should be considered an “also-ran”? It is a true WW2 operational aircraft, and rarely gets credit for this. It did well at the role that was assigned to it in the closing stages of WW2.

    The Me.262 grabs much of the limelight because of its advanced aerodynamic design, and axial flow engines, but this design was poorly executed, poorly built, constrained by internal political influences, and dwindling resources, and hence its effectiveness was limited. A case of its “bark being louder than its bite!” I think 😀

    in reply to: Jet engines to the Soviet Union #1250518
    TempestV
    Participant

    Not that a centrifugal engine would in any way fit under the wings of an Me-262…

    – Hence why the meteor ended up with having the engines mounted mid-wing, creating a ‘banjo’ type spar.

    I have often wondered why the Me.262 gets so much attention with all its short-comings, when the Meteor Mk.1 is a bona-fide WW2 operational fighter (albiet chasing doodlebugs) with 616 squadron, but this was more down to policy rather than anything else. It was much more reliable and a evolutionary step forward in design, much as the vampire F.1 too.

    in reply to: Beech Restorations/SRA Hangar update inc pics #1252941
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hi Ben

    great progress…. also, I have sent you a pm.

    in reply to: Mosquito c/n 1718? #1253529
    TempestV
    Participant

    Chatting to a collegue from Salisbury hall at the weekend can I can add a few more details to this mosquito part.

    Niether of serial numbers shown are the the aircraft construction number unfortunately, however they do identify it as being from a mosquito elevator.

    J981018 is a drawing number and identifies an elevator assembly.

    1718 is not the a/c construction number.

    The “GPB” reference is likely to be the sub-contractors initials, and is one we have’nt seen before.

    The exact location of the find would establish a better chance of getting the true identity.

    in reply to: Mosquito c/n 1718? #1256086
    TempestV
    Participant

    If either of these numbers is the actual construction number, then looking at the production serials:

    98″0750″ could be an FB.6 in the HJxxx serial range

    and

    98″1718″ could also be an FB.6 in the HRxxx serial range.

    Are there any details about where this aircraft was found?

    in reply to: Mosquito c/n 1718? #1256112
    TempestV
    Participant

    … a rare find! I have been lucky enough to sit in several of the surviving UK mosquitos and have not seen any of the serial plates before.

    The construction number for this aircraft could either be 981018 or 1718, which puts it somewhere between the following two known serials acording to the website noted.

    HJ723=98750 (to G-AGGH)

    RG233=982827

    The following website is a very good reference for de Havilland production references:

    http://www.dehavilland.ukf.net/_DH98%20prodn%20list.txt

    http://www.dehavilland.ukf.net/

    in reply to: Typhoon, Thunderbolt canopy question. #1256230
    TempestV
    Participant

    On the subject of blown canopies, I believe in the UK, the largest single skin canopy was the DH Hornet one that was first made in 1944. This was roughly 7 feet long, 2 feet wide at its base, and roughly 2 feet tall! Clearly they had a few teathing troubles, because several early were reported to have ones shattered in flight.

    …. see my AVATAR for a piccie.

    in reply to: Typhoon, Thunderbolt canopy question. #1258718
    TempestV
    Participant

    I have sat in a P47 and Sea Fury cockpits and they are a different width between the canopy rails, so I would say they are different canopies. (The sea fury and typhoon share the same windscreen “A-frame” assembly and basic canopy geometry.)

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 1,411 total)