Mark 12……. so cruel. 😮
Mark12
David Collins,
Do not look at the Sea Hornet on the same page, circa 1963.
Mark
….. easily done, as I do not own a copy!
😀 😀
… what a completely justifiable, and worthy recovery this has been!
It just shows what can be done, with the right resources, the right people, and the mindset of preserving a very apt memorial to those who fought for our futures.
I’m in awe of this Halifax re-build. Congratulations to all who have been involved with this.
…. ok, we have a Vulcan, what next?
Well, realistically just keeping it airworthy will be a massive effort. Don’t squander money on other aircraft 😮 just keep attending the airshows it will be at. 😀
Lindy’s Lad
Regarding the re-building/restoring/repro/replica/bolt-on data plate/provenance issue, this forum has plenty of discussion on this topic, so I won’t go into it here.
But in the case of the Brigand. One airframe substantially exists. It has a serial, and known provenance. The fact that its wings are missing, probably won’t detract from its originality much. If what is there, could be sympathetically conserved, or built into a complete static display airframe, then it is still substantially an original Bristol Brigand.
Rlangham, XN923
The Brigand would be a realistic prospect to make a part restoration, part reproduction (using other donor Bristol parts), but you will have to look elsewhere for someone to do it….. my hands are a little full at present! 🙂 🙂 🙂 😉
….not entirely in context, but I would like to see the Bristol Brigand TF.1 fully restored, making new wings, undercarriage, fitting engines, etc. and on display. This is the sole surviving fuselage, and really could do with being complete once again.
Does this share wings, undercarriage, with the Beaufighter, Beaufort, Blenheim, Bolingbroke series?
Stuart
hear, hear!
…..anyone for a corgi burger? 😮 I’ll get me coat.
…. out European partners aside, I work with plenty, and have a lot of German friends! The point I was trying to make regarding the site that the Mercedes building is situated, is that it is just not in keeping with the surroundings at all. Its just like putting a MacDon@lds in the middle of the lawns at Buckingham Palace, without anyone noticing.
:confused: :confused: :confused:
Hi there
If the hydraulic unit is sealed, then it is likely to be some sort of damper. So for an aircraft, read anti-shimmy device.
If there are hydraulic connenctions, in and out, then it is an actuator. Any more than that I cannot say.
Hi Creaking Door
Probably because Daimler-Chrysler (Mercedes-Benz) own the land!
Well yes exactly…..how did that happen to such a significant site??? 🙁
Hello
Leaving the museum aside for a second, I would like to question how the local council allowed a Mercedes car dealership to build the monstrosity that is, the a large smoked glass building, right in the middle of it all! Wherever you go on the site, and even if the banking is ever fully restored, there is this great big ugly lump of smoked glass and steel building, that is totally out of keeping with its surroundings, visible from everywhere on the site.
And I ask you, what does Mercedes have to do with the home of British aviation and Motorsport. It would be just like Lotus setting up a dealership at Kitty hawk, or in the middle of the Nurburg ring??
As far as the museum goes. Every museum has a limited amount of staff and funding. A large portion of the Brooklands museum is well laid out, well presented, and cares for its exhibits to a good degree. Remember, the jumble of buildings on its site are all original, and have evolved as part of a race track and factory complex. These are not designed to look pretty, certainly from the 40’s onwards. I’m sure the museum tries every year to improve its facilities, but with some of the factory buildings and hangar, it is a constant battle to preserve these, as well as the exhibits. Some of the more recent buildings do need some tlc, but I don’t see any exhibits suffering, and they are certainly well cared for. You are correct, the ongoing significance of this site is nationally important to us.
I suggest that anyone concerned about the preservation of UK aviation/motorsport should go and lend their support directly (either financial of physical) to your local museum, as it is only through hands-on efforts that these places can be maintained.
Thanks Bruce!
Hi Elliott
Sorry, it appears that this is a de-icer fluid tank. Mosquito or Vampire, not sure?? Anybody identify the owning “type”?
I’ll keep my eyes open for one for you.
Hawker Tomtit
Avro Tutor
Southern Martlet
Hawker Hind
Gloster Gladiator (for Now)
Westland Lysander (Again for now)
Hawker Sea Hurricane
Blackburn Monoplane
Deperdussin Monoplane
Sopwith Pup
Avro 504K
Parnall Elf
I think that there are two sea hurricanes flying – AE977 in the USA is one, it just doesn’t have its hook fitted.
How about the NF.11 Meteor at Coventry as the only two seat fighter of this type flying?
The Blenheim will count as the sole flyer again one day, and so to will Avspecs mosquito in the not too distant future.