Spitfire mk1 remains
Having seen the photo of this spitfire “emerging from the beach” in france in flypast in the 1980’s, and even the lesser (but still substantial wings, centre section, and other type specific parts) remains today, I consider this to me much more than a data-plate restoration. Sure, a lot will get replaced, but there will still be a non-flying spitfire going into a hangar, having several £££ spent on it, and a flying example emerging after a few years…..which is a good thing!
Received with thanks!!!
Got mine too….
I have seen another BW photo of this Fury with the Sabre VII. The aircraft is painted overall silver with a Blue or Red spinner, and cheatline running from the spinner along the fuselage, just like the silver/red spitfire scheme that used to adorn Historic Flying’s lowback MkXVI.
I think that it may have appeared at an early post war Farnborough display.
Hawker fury LA610 with Sabre VII
The prettiest version courtest of:
http://www.vflintham.demon.co.uk/. ../typhtem/fury.htm
Hi Sea Vixen
I would prefer to see a whole aircraft any day. How stunning is a spitfire, especially flying. Imagine if there were no complete spitfires left, and just a few cockpits. How tragic would that be!
As for the BA collection at RAF Cosford, I am supprised that they see fit to dispose of these, while at the same time, there is clearly much resource being expended on the new Cold War museum there. Its really like the Hendon Beverley situation all over again. No lessons learnt there then.
Airliners, along with large bomber or transport aircraft will always present the hardest airframes to preserve. I knew one of the team who restored the B52 at Duxford, which was a massive task. And even this, fully painted and kept within a dry museum could have a limited life, owing to the high magnesium content in its airframe!
??? :diablo:
Moggy
“It also has a big time problem with its undercarriage and the authorities which has left most of them grounded, unless I am very confused?”
Yes it did. The CAA decided to “raise the bar” regarding the undercarriage loading. The original design was passed 100% ok by them in the 80’s.
Unfortunately, following 2 occurences where pilots decided to “land” at a descent rate, where no aircraft undercarriage could have survived (with the exception of a carrier type!) and their slipper tank risked being punctured. New undercarriage has been designed to new legislation.
To date, no-one has ever been killed in a Shadow, and there have never been any airframe failures over 25 year history. I have flown in one many times.
Dave Cook
A good friend of mine – Dave Cook.
Designer/Pilot/Owner/Salesman of CFM Metal Fax of Leiston, Suffolk.
Aviation Award winner, multiple world record holder, proudly British.
Sadly the company is no longer in existence, because he has retired, but he was personally responsible for selling 400+ Shadow series Ultralights in the 80’s and 90’s. The aircraft has superior flying qualities compared with any of its class, and makes inovative use of affordable materials, hence making aviation more affordable to all.
Who says that the British aircraft industry was in decline.
Sea Vixen quoted:
personally i have never seen the point of preserving just the cockpit..its like buying a old classic car and just keeping the dashboard !!!!. i have never looked at a cockpit and thought, thats a fantastic looking aircraft..a aircaft has got wings and a tail… oh **** that one havnt got eny !!!!!!.
Everyone is entitled to their own personal preferences on what is worth saving, or spending time and resources on. If there is little else left, other than the cockpit to start with then a cockpit is worth saving. From a pilots perspective, you will spend 99% of your time in the cockpit anyway. It is the part that he/she has the majority of their personal interaction with.
Secondly, as long as there remains a complete example of a type left in a museum, with an assured future, I see no harm in saving a cockpit from an aircraft that is being scrapped anyway. This is afterall more likely to “last the distance” and be better looked after than a large complete airframe.
UK Aircraft preservation in 2006
Dear all
I have been following this thread for a few days, and have now decided to put in writing some thoughts. There are clearly a lot of interested preservationists who read and contribute to this forum, which in a big way, is a good thing for the movement as a whole anyway.
I believe the following statement to be true, but am happy to stand corrected, if proven otherwise: “Compared to most other countries in the west there are a lot of aircraft preserved in the UK, probably second only to the US.”
Just compare the latest editions of UK Wrecks and Relics, to the European Wrecks and Relics books for a start! With more aircraft, more museums, groups & individuals with very diverse ideas of collecting and their preservation standards, coupled with a very variable climate and funding issues, probably gives the UK the greatest headache in terms of what to save for future posterity compared to most other countries.
I for one attended several BAPC meetings in the early 90’s, while with a small group with the difficult task of restoring a Meteor and a Vampire outdoors! There was clearly a will in the council to save airframes for future generations, and in one form or another, it remains so to this day. The proposals put forward in this thread are all good, and are core to the BAPC. The council meetings were good to spread the word in “stopping the rot” at a very grass roots level, and have managed to save many airframes over the years, however without real legal powers, it is very difficult to influence the future of a privately owned airframe facing the axe, whether it be “owned” by Joe public, a charitable trust or a National body, because in many cases the £££ out weigh the greater cause, while their actions can be limited to just lobbying.
There are many levels of involvement from aircraft preservationists. I’m doing my bit, and I know many others who are too. Echoing Bruce Gordon, and Stuart Gowans comments, indeed there are fewer of the younger generations coming through with the interest or skills. But this sadly reflects the downward spiral of industry.
The involvement of the individual is key, at what ever level. There are for example:
– Cockpit owners. (like myself these days)
– Working + Retired staff Weekend volunteers at museums.
– Mostly Retired staff Weekday volunteers at museums.
– Fulltime Paid restorers at museums.
All levels of involvement are necessary, and indeed form the backbone of preserving our heritage. It is important for any individual or museum to have a clear collecting policy and only collect what you can afford. I would rather visit a museum with one historically significant aircraft preserved, researched, and displayed indoors, than a field full of many that are sinking up to their axels in mud, with a bad state of preservation, where the resources are stretched.
Can somebody on the Forum publish an up-to-date list of the BAPC airframes on this thread so we can see if what is considered saving?
I would be interested to see how individual aircraft are assessed, or graded as to their significance. If you could save only 3 of the following, how would one do so?
1/ Hawker Typhoon. – Sole survivor, USA evaluation aircraft, no service use.
2/ Fairey Barracuda II. – Salvaged wreckage, sole survivor, FAA service use.
3/ Bristol Brigand. – Damaged fuselage only, sole survivor.
4/ de Havilland Sea Vampire 1 – Prototype, one of few early vampires left.
5/ de Havilland Mosquito – Prototype, one of few early mosquito’s left.
6/ Gloster E.28/39 – First UK jet powered aircraft.
7/ Supermarine Spitfire MK.IX, MH434 – Combat record, continually flown for past 60+ years, mostly original.
8/ Vickers Valiant – Dropped UK’s first atomic bomb.
9/ Avro York – Complete preserved, memorial to the Berlin airlift.
10/ de Havilland DH.88 Comet Racer – Race winner.
Daft comparison really, as these are all clearly examples of significant airframes worth saving for future generations, but try applying a selection process to literally the 800+ types of aircraft in the UK alone, and then multiply this by the overall number of examples of each type (each individual history, with varying states of preservation and ownership), then you can see how complex a task it can be. There will be fewer resources to preserve each aircraft, and the condition of most located outdoors will significantly deteriorate within out lifetimes, so there is a real need to help identify those most at risk and act accordingly, and soon.
72 Squadron photos
Hello TomDocherty72
The Meteor F.8 is progressing well. I saw it only recently. It could well be the best restored Meteor in the UK when finished. The airframe is currently getting a very deep restoration worthy of a flying example, although this is purely static. They have gone about it in the best way possible, in that everything is being done to the best standards, with eye to long term in-door preservation. I’m pretty certain that it will never need another restoration. I have had a small part in helping its progress, but the credit is all the small team of guys doing it.
I would love to attend the 72 squadron re-union, if only briefly. I worked at North Weald for several years in the late 80’s/early 90’s. I have a couple of 72 sqn photos if you would like me to bring them along, or post to you?
Its great for the Squadron assosciation that this meteor is returning to its North Weald colours.
Aeroventure support
I think that Aeroventure are doing a great job. It’s great to see a “live” museum. All the staff know their subject well, and are trying to do a good thing for aviation preservation for the UK as a whole, without the backing of a major national museum budget.
They are an excellent staging post for many projects that pass through, and have been responsible for giving a home to many an item for future preservation by themselves, or by others.
Keep up the good work.
Certifying a “Proctuka” to fly
Maybe a moot point now, but how would it have been possible (then or now) to certify these very heavily modified “Proctucas” for flight? Please no CAA bashing here, I’m just curious.
Also for example, there was a Harvard at North Weald in the late 80’s that had been modified to represent a Zero for the film Tora Tora Tora in the USA, including a 3 bladed prop, rounded wing tips, and a single seat canopy glazing. Would this have retained its american “Experimental” certification while in the UK? This was also a modified from standard type.
My Hornet wish list!
Although very specific to my project, my Hornet wish list would be as follows:
– Hornet Windscreen casting.
– Hornet Canopy.
– Hornet Nose fairing.
There is no chance of a complete example being found any where, so there is no point wishing for one turning up! All of these bits are possible to make, just very expensive, and will take a while.
Suggestion – add your forum user name in brackets after individual aircraft.
Beechcraft D.18s G-BKRN (Texantomcat)
BAC Lightning 53-671/ZF579 (mjr)
Blackburn Buccaneer S.2B XX889 (Buccsociety)
de Havilland Hornet F.MK.1 Cockpit/Forward fuselage – reproduction (dcollins103)
de Havilland Vampire FB.MK.5 Cockpit – VZ193 (dcollins103)
de Havilland Vampire T. Mk 11 XD599 (Texantomcat)
Handley Page Halifax B Mk III cockpit reproduction (HP57)
Hawker Hurricane (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F1 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F2 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F6 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Typhoon Cockpit (Rocketeer)
Miles Messenger M.2a G-AKIN (Rocketeer)
North American AT-6-D-1-NT Texan G-TOMC (Texantomcat)
Supermarine Spitfire Cockpit (Rocketeer)
Supermarine Swift F7 Nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)