dark light

TempestV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bucc V Tomcat #1407771
    TempestV
    Participant

    Tomcat for Duxford.

    Why not fundraise millions for an American Naval Museum at Duxford too 😀 !

    in reply to: CockpitFest Planning June 2006 #1409664
    TempestV
    Participant

    Dave T: “I’ve just reviewed the photo gallery on ICC for the last 4 years, and aside from Tonys Hurricane, Naylans stuff and Stuarts Spitfire, i cant see any other ‘work in progress’ or ‘starter’ or ‘just acquired’ cockpits featured.”

    Hello Dave T

    I guess that you didn’t notice my “Work in progress” Hornet cockpit project at Newark 2005? Maybe this was due to being in the new Hangar away from the main display area. As a preference, I would prefer to join the main group of cockpits this year, albeit under a fetching gazebo type tent. I am also preparing some display boards with photographs, drawings, and contact details.

    I believe that Cockpit-fest is the event for physically promoting your project to the public, as most spend much of their lives in the garage or restoration workshop away from view. It is only the minority that are actually under the umbrella of a museum, and will eventually see the light of day upon completion. Yes, it is not cheap to transport aircraft cockpits around, and when you consider that it is a whole weekend used up too, there is a big investement in time, but I think it is a small outlay in comparison to meeting interested members of the public, and other project owners.

    We should all be greatful that a major museum and national magazine are providing us with a forum to exhibit our projects. There will always be conflicts over when to have an event, whether with sporting or holiday fixtures, especially in June, but I would much rather have it when it is, rather than 200 pairs of muddy feet go through each exhibit! May I suggest reveiwing the successes and perceived failures of previous events, and just working up a list of lessons learnt from which to create the 2006 event from.

    I will be lending my support to the event for as many years as it will run, and I hope to encourage others to do so too.

    in reply to: Langford Lodge Farewell! #1415075
    TempestV
    Participant

    Wildcat

    I went there in 2004. The Wildcat restoration was progressing well, but with the impending eviction from the airfield, it was likely to go back into storage along with all of the other aircraft. Restoration work is likely to cease until a permanent home is found.

    It was a great little museum, on a really interesting site. I can’t imagine houses being put there as it is absolutely in the middle of no-where!

    Good luck to the museum staff they were (are) doing a great job.

    in reply to: CockpitFest Planning June 2006 #1417467
    TempestV
    Participant

    Further suggestions.

    Also…. in 1941.

    Thats 65 years ago!

    First flight of the Gloster E.28/39.

    de Havilland Mosquito enters service with the RAF.

    in reply to: CockpitFest Planning June 2006 #1418342
    TempestV
    Participant

    Cockpit fest 2006 theme proposal.

    A look at the RAF history timeline on its website shows the following:

    2006 is the anniversary for:

    60 years since the introduction of the de Havilland Hornet F.1 into RAF service, and first flight of the de Havilland Chipmunk. The world absolute speed record was also set by a Meteor F.IV.

    55 years since the introduction of the EE Canberra into service with 101 Squadron, and the Avro Shackelton to 120 Squadron..

    50 years since the introduction of the Gloster Javelin, de Havilland Comet, and Avro Vulcan into RAF service.

    Plenty of potential here for a theme?

    in reply to: British aircraft with RR Ghost? #1426236
    TempestV
    Participant

    Hunters vs Sabres

    There is a book that describes the combat between Hunters and Sabres. The Sabre being the much older design actually came out on top.

    I’m sure that some one will add some facts to this brief statement, like who actually was at each other with them! (Possible India and A.N.Other).

    I would be interested to hear more.

    in reply to: Trying to ID Gunsight and the A/C that used it #1368821
    TempestV
    Participant

    Another use of MK4B Gunsite

    I’m guessing, but did DC just wet himself like an excited puppy ?

    Writing this with clean and dry trousers! 🙂

    I think that the MK4B Gunsite was also used in FB.11 Sea Furies.

    in reply to: Trying to ID Gunsight and the A/C that used it #1369930
    TempestV
    Participant

    MkIVB GGS

    Wardie

    It is fitted to the deHavilland Hornet! How much do you want for it. Would you consider selling?

    p.m. me off-line if you wish, or e-mail: [email]dcollins103@hotmail.com[/email]

    in reply to: Jet Age Museum – update anyone ? #1375572
    TempestV
    Participant

    Meteor F.3

    “I seem to remember John saying that they were trimming down the NON-Gloster aircraft in the collection.”

    Shame the Meteor F.3 had to go then!

    in reply to: Forum visit, DH Museum, 11th December #1384360
    TempestV
    Participant

    Message for Flat 12×2

    Calling: Flat 12×2 – I’ll be there too….see you around 2pm?

    in reply to: The future ten years from now, extinct types resurfacing? #1384362
    TempestV
    Participant

    Likely additions in 10 years time.

    If we are to see a new shape in the skys again, the rarer project will already have been going for a while already.

    So I would suggest that we may see:

    Vulcan
    Beaufighter
    Mosquito
    Tempest II

    in reply to: "Aircraft Production" magazine apr/may 1942 #1425370
    TempestV
    Participant

    Aircraft Production

    Harold

    The RAF museum at Hendon has a complete set of these magazines. I’m sure if you requested nicely ($$), that they would laser copy the relevant spitfire articles for you, rather than the normal bw photo-copy.

    in reply to: Scatterd airframe sections around the UK, plan? #1350753
    TempestV
    Participant

    Realistic projects in the making

    I too have given this some thought over the years.
    This is partly why I decided it was possible to recreate a Hornet. There are parts around.

    There are also enough parts around to put another Wellington together.
    Elliott is making great progress with the Whitley. This is entirely possible to assemble in time.
    The Halifax recreation at Elvington also shows that it can be done.
    The Stirling project is another example.
    There are several Typhoon cockpits that are growing into full fuselages.

    I don’t think that any of these are flights of fancy, they are all possible. They just need dedicated restorers working on them over the years.

    in reply to: got it!!! #1353267
    TempestV
    Participant

    MK.4B GGS wanted

    Another variant of the MK4 GGS family was the MK4B gyro gun site, as fitted to the DH Hornet and (possibly) the Sea Fury. Does anyone have one for sale/trade?

    PM me if anyone has!!!

    in reply to: Airworthy Venom's And Vampire's #1353289
    TempestV
    Participant

    Venom/Vampire construction

    Dave

    Were the Vampire and Venom built in the same way as the Mosquito, with the same materials? I know they are wood. I was just wondering if they are the same, because so many people talk about the delamination and breakdown of the glues with Mosquitoes – yet I’m sure these cannot be two different, can they? Or am I right off the mark here. If they were constructed using the same methods and materials, how do the operators overcome the problems Mossies have? Is the vibration of the jet less harsh on the airframe?

    Yes, in part the venom/vampire fuselage (pod) is made in the same way as the Mosquito, constructed using the same methods and materials. The main difference is that the vampire/venom’s main load bearing structures, ie. the wings, tailplane and booms are all aluminium. The vampire/venoms wooden fuselage/cockpit is essentially a large fairing that is fixed to the front of the wing spar, housing the pilot, nav, and/or radar, depending on Mark. The fuselages do suffer from delamination, if not maintained properly, just like the mosquito. The difference is that the delamination suffered by Mosquitos and Hornets was mainly in the wing, which is the main load bearing structure.

    Wood delamination mainly occurs if an airframe is stored outside for a long time, and especially if there is damage to the fabric covering. This is worsened in the case of the mosquito/hornet by operation in humid climates, and pulling high G in manoeuvers.

    Current opperators of the type generally keep them hangared all of the time, and give them an easier life. However, once the airframe hours are used up, they are up! The airworthy population is only getting smaller, with very few restorations happening.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 1,411 total)