mustang surface area
If someone would be kind enough to send me a 3D flight simulator model of a mustang, I could import it in to my CAD software, and give you an exact surface area. If you were looking for a wetted area for aerodynamic drag calculations, that is?
🙂
Rare/Priceless? aircraft
I think the term “rare” best describes something, when there is only a few left, when there were originally thousands. When there is only a sole survivor of a type, I believe this is best called “priceless”, or “unique”, ie Hawker Typhoon, Defiant, etc.
Given that someone with enough money these days, can pretty much get his/her favorite aircraft made from new, however rare the type may be, a rare or priceless tag for an aircraft can make it very desireable for the collector. For example, who would have thought 20 years ago that we would be seeing airworthy numerous Rata’s, Polikarpovs, Zeros, Yaks, Me262’s, Me109’s, Fw190’s, etc?
These types are still rare, given the small production runs, even if some are new-builds.
There are projects to do several other unique aircraft. In the UK there is the Stirling Project and The Hornet Project to name but two. Say these were both flying new-builds. The tooling, materials, labour, space, etc. could be more for a stirling (possibly 2-3 times), but I guess that a Hornet would be more desireable to a potential collector because of its performance, and potential re-sale value, in comparison.
Hence, why the above named desireable fighters get limited new-build production runs, and equally historically significant, but less desireable aircraft are ignored.
Hornet Project
I would like to attend. I will bring my Hornet cockpit in whatever state of build it reaches by June.
I did not know that this type was made of brass, and considerably thinner than the aluminium type.
In the light of this information, it may be possible to make a press tool from several layers of cheap MDF, inlaid with steel wire (forming the male half of the swage form). The female half of the MDF tool can simply be routed with a rounded cutter, to match the same profile(allowing for material thickness).
Large diameter rod can be used to locate the two halves of the tool, then put in a flypress. I have done this on a similar application, and seems to work well. Ideal for the “cockpit builder” working on a tight budget, or for prototyping generally.
Blind flying panel “swaging”
Hi DaveR
I have seen this type panel on mosquitos as well. Curved top, with raised “Swaged” ridges inbetween the instruments. To create this sort of form in a panel, this thick, would need a heavy press/steel tooling to achieve. I have never seen one for sale.
Two farmers in Suffolk have these engines, I believe. Their collection consists of a couple of griffons, Hendons Beverly centaurus’ and numerous radials. Fantastic well maintained and stored collection.
On May 21st 2005, 50+ former hornet pilots will be having their 50th anniversary re-union at the Mosquito Museum. The largest display of Hornet aircraft parts (including an engine, fuselage sections, wheels, cockpit, and photo’s will be on display. This is likely to be a one-off event, owing to the advanced ages of the gentlemen. I hope to be creating some artwork for the pilots, to sign, to comemmorate the event.
I will be displaying my “work in progress” cockpit project, and also giving a talk about it’s build and development.
Later in the year, I will be attending the Cockpit-fest event at Newark. I am looking forward to meeting the rest of the cockpit builders.
By the end of 2005, the cockpit will start it’s process of growing rearwards, eventually forming a complete fuselage in time.
Historic aviation use of CAD/CAE software
All
Modern CAD software has been mentioned several times in recent months, in several threads. I thought that you may be interested in some information on the subject.
Firstly CAD, it is merely a 2 dimensional, or 3 dimensional drawing tool. There are no magic buttons to press “design me a car/aeroplane/ship”, etc. A good design engineer still has to have a good brain! There are methods now where this 2D/3D information can be sent to a machine that mills/turns tooling or finished components, but generally you have to work with a toolmaker or manufacturing guy.
I use 3D CAD for my project. It is worth its weight in gold, to help piece fragmented remains together. But when you start with a complete airframe, it is probably not necessary. You cannot improve on the original significantly. The Flug Werk 190’s were drawn by a guy in Herts, and the “more efficient propellors” developed, we’re probably done only so their profiles and twist matched the selected engine properties better, and materials specified? Otherwise, why change?
Several people have asked me to produce CAD models of their wings and fuselages. This is a relatively easy thing to do, as long as key information is supplied. ie. sections, dimensions and photographs.
building new mosquitos.
Jetman-2
look at this website:
specifically here:
Also, Self financed, and self taught!
You can hand make most things. What I’m doing is fit for purpose. My project won’t (unfortunately) be pulling +6g at 450mph, but helping to display what original Hornet parts still exist. Funhouse (Dave) will probably agree with me that what we are doing on our projects, is equivalent to prototype parts. Our tooling is considerably cheaper though.
Albatross Drawings
Phillip
The drawings for the Albatross still exist. Along with the Flamingo, DH.108 swallow, and it is the same place that I got the DH.103 Hornet ones from.
Yes it is possible to re-make an Albatross, Glyn powell is using exactly the same process on his mosquito projects, but these once sold, will cover the cost of the tooling as there is a market for them. There is unlikely to be a similar market for the Albatross. It was a fantastic looking aircraft though.
cheers!
Identifying aircraft type from the rivet!
All
Here’s a poser…!
Several years ago, I was walking along the beach at Thorpness, Suffolk. Found a piece of aircraft washed up, that was still good aluminium on one end, with greased bolts and paint visible, and corroded to powder at the other end! The clean end must have been buried. I have never been able to identify the aircraft type, but I have been informed that the centre-popped mush-head rivets used are US wartime. The leading edge is steel, with a pointed nose. It looks like the elevator of a fighter, because of it’s dimensions. I have had a good look at as many wartime US aircraft as possible, without any luck.
Further praise!
Funhouse
You are still churning out some good parts!
Looking at your seat. Have you used pop-rivets, or solid csk/mush-head type?
If they are the counter-sink head type. What chamfer angle are you using, as I am just about to do a load of solid rivetting, and haven’t the correct cutter yet?
Former North Weald museum T6
Phil
I did a little work on this T6. It was built from parts gathered together from scrapyards by two brothers. They sold it to Aces High in the late 80’s/early 90’s, and it was then quickly sold across the pond.
I will try and post a photo tonight. From memory it was bare metal, with a red/white check engine cowl, and memorably had a large black DF loop teardrop fairing behind the canopy.