dark light

davecurnock

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 554 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mustang Mk I #906105
    davecurnock
    Participant

    Didn’t they have 2 guns in each wing?

    2 x .303 and 1 x 0.5 Browning per wing, I believe.

    in reply to: What's your headstone going to be like? #1846897
    davecurnock
    Participant

    I’m hoping not to have a headstone (or a grave, for that matter!) – having been accused in the past of being a waste of space, I wouldn’t like to inconvenience the gravediggers in their having to make a space for my ‘waste’ remains.
    (Even though that process is generally carried out quite rapidly, courtesy of one of Mr J C Bamford’s products!).

    Now, if the crematorium was solar powered….

    in reply to: Request on behalf of Mike Eastman #920957
    davecurnock
    Participant

    “Send three and fourpence, we’re going to a dance” – sorry, couldn’t resist the old command school mis-communications thingy!

    davecurnock
    Participant

    It’s one of those tiresome ‘spoof’ online “news” blogs/ego trips/student rags, or whatever.

    Their current ‘About us’ page states:

    About us

    World News Daily Report is an American Jewish Zionist newspaper based in Tel Aviv and dedicated on covering biblical archeology news and other mysteries around the Globe.

    Our News Team is composed of award winning christian, muslim and jewish journalists, retired Mossad agents and veterans of the Israeli Armed Forces.

    We are based in Tel Aviv since 1988 where are published more then 200,000 copies of our Daily Report paper edition everyday.
    – See more at: http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/about-us/#sthash.fbReagLy.dpuf

    in reply to: Shuttleworth Wings And Wheels July 27th #462169
    davecurnock
    Participant

    Nice pictures, David!

    Can’t help thinking the combination of a largely fabric-covered Anson, a flexible towing bridle, and a spark-emitting steam tractor, are pushing the boundaries a little.

    in reply to: G-FUKM – Gazelle #386551
    davecurnock
    Participant

    You’re right Garry – they eventually dropped the logo citing a lack of relevance in the modern world (or something like that). ( But I’m sure I saw it at Lyneham before I left the RAF in December ’77)

    From Wiki (:dev2:)

    Robertson’s officially ‘retired’ Golly in 2002. The company had found that Golly was, on the whole, no longer popular with the children of families, although the scheme (collecting the brooches/badges) was still successful with adult collectors.

    Robertson’s always insisted that they did not retire the Golly because of the pressure of “political correctness” in the 1990s (the caricature is now generally considered to be racist), but simply for commercial reasons. Virginia C “Ginny” Knox, then brand director at Robertson’s commented:
    “ We are retiring Golly because we found families with kids no longer necessarily knew about him. We are not bowing to political correctness, but like with any great brand we have to move with the times ” 😉

    in reply to: G-FUKM – Gazelle #386563
    davecurnock
    Participant

    There was some controversy over the registration G-OLLY. At one time it was applied to a Navajo operated by Robertsons Jam; the logo/trade mark on their product label at the time featured the image of a (then) popular childrens’ toy.

    in reply to: SPOTTED 2014 #862193
    davecurnock
    Participant

    Reds – south of Swindon (trying to get sorted into a decent formation!) at 15:07.

    in reply to: Old car identification #1849149
    davecurnock
    Participant

    I believe Adrian is correct; I think it is an Austin A40 Somerset, based on the two-door tourer. Could be a one-off, although the factory ‘farmed out’ some work to conversion specialists. Could possibly be an A70 Hampshire/Hereford as these shared many panels.
    Quite a rarity these days as most cars of the era very rapidly converted into iron oxide, etc

    in reply to: Old car identification #1849161
    davecurnock
    Participant

    13 is a Flying Standard 12
    15 is a Humber Snipe
    17 looks like an Austin Light Van(judging by the badge
    19 is a Morris 14(could be a Wolsey but I can’t see the little badge that lights up on the radiator grill)
    21 is a Commer Cob with passenger windows added or another Hillman Husky

    I believe 19 is a Wolseley – close inspection of the top of the radiator grill looks like the illuminated badge of that particular variant.

    Vans with side windows were quite common in the 1950s-1960s, due to the vehicle purchase tax system in force at the time. Some vans had the luxury of SLIDING side windows….my finances dictated the cheaper ‘fixed’ single pane option on my Ford Thames van. Mine also had a modified bus seat in the back, with a quick release wing nut system. Served me well with a young family to lug around, until I was posted to oriental climes. It continued to serve my (single)younger brother as a passion wagon for a further two years after that.

    in reply to: Old car identification #1849282
    davecurnock
    Participant

    Showing my age here – I remember most of these :apologetic: and have driven (or had a ride in :o) a couple, including the SS Jaguar and the Ford van used by our butcher.

    5. Austin 8 Tourer (Moggy is right! – as always?)

    6. SS Jaguar Mark IV

    7. Hillman Husky

    8 & 9. Sunbeam Talbot 10 (I once owned a Sunbeam Talbot 90 – wish I could afford one now!)

    10. Morris 8 Series II

    11 & 12. Ford E494C 5 cwt van (I admit, I Googled the type number!)

    in reply to: Proposed Wind Farm ar Bullington Cross #386830
    davecurnock
    Participant

    Great news for all you GA pilots. Every planning application for these inefficient monstrous white elephants is to be applauded loudly!;)

    Great news indeed, although I’m not a GA pilot!

    By the way, regarding Charlie’s ‘white elephants’ – why are they all white?
    Has anybody seen one in any other colour? :confused:

    davecurnock
    Participant

    On a large transport aircraft base in Wiltshire :rolleyes: the MT vehicle mileage was severely capped during the fuel crisis. On my squadron, engineering staff were instructed to walk to their designated aircraft on dispersal, carrying the necessary tools and equipment with them, rather than use a vehicle – not necessarily a bad thing, you might be thinking. However, some of the remote stands were a round trip of about one hour from the flight office; the tools and equipment also required a greater number of personnel than previously for their carriage as there were insufficient hand carts available – together, this often slowed the job down somewhat! Anyway, this in itself was not a major problem as local flying was severely restricted during the fuel crisis, thus reducing the number of serviceable frames required for tasking. By default, some of the ground engineers clocked up more flying time than aircrew during this period (not many ‘flying spanners’ v lots of aircrew).

    During the power strikes/outages, the dispersal stadium lighting was turned off at midnight, unless an urgent operational requirement dictated otherwise. Apart from a severe lack of illumination for engineering tasks that took place during the hours of darkness, this resulted in several incidents; the most serious being a ‘road traffic’ accident in which a ground engineer was knocked down and injured outside the line squadron hangar by a patrolling RAFP in his Minivan. Apparently the plod failed to see the engineer due to the lack of lighting, stadium lights ‘off’ and Mini headlamps on! – the outcome resulted in ground crews being instructed to wear reflective cross-belts over their working kit during the hours of darkness!

    in reply to: The name is on the tip of my…. #913650
    davecurnock
    Participant

    :rolleyes:Me too!

    in reply to: The name is on the tip of my…. #913798
    davecurnock
    Participant

    Vickers Vernon!

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 554 total)