dark light

mixtec

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,348 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 3-view drawings #400920
    mixtec
    Participant

    Im pretty decent at sketching planes if thats all you want. If your talking about professional design drafting, sorry, dont do that. My emails activated if you want to send me something, and Ill scan you back a sketch.

    in reply to: General Discussion #397325
    mixtec
    Participant

    Originally posted by SOC
    Care to explain that one?

    Is the US economy doing good now that the US has a republican president? Did the economy pick up with Clinton after the Reagan/Bush Sr years?

    in reply to: John Kerry #1975500
    mixtec
    Participant

    Originally posted by SOC
    Care to explain that one?

    Is the US economy doing good now that the US has a republican president? Did the economy pick up with Clinton after the Reagan/Bush Sr years?

    in reply to: General Discussion #397462
    mixtec
    Participant

    I happen to believe that democrats have been responcible for all the prosperity and good that is in the US. But I have to agree with your assessment of Kerry, hes a “dangerous” democrat, and lacks any personal values. The type who will do anything for gain.

    in reply to: John Kerry #1975546
    mixtec
    Participant

    I happen to believe that democrats have been responcible for all the prosperity and good that is in the US. But I have to agree with your assessment of Kerry, hes a “dangerous” democrat, and lacks any personal values. The type who will do anything for gain.

    in reply to: General Discussion #397962
    mixtec
    Participant

    Ill bet you didnt make it past one of these in your record setting runs

    in reply to: Instant aviation-themed timewaster #1975817
    mixtec
    Participant

    Ill bet you didnt make it past one of these in your record setting runs

    in reply to: hi alt airports #681045
    mixtec
    Participant

    Originally posted by wysiwyg
    Mixtec, is Quito’s elevation above 8400′? If so and American 757’s are operating into there they must be under a relaxed set of limitations compared to JAA rules. This is not impossible as the FAA allows their 757’s to do Mach 0.86 at high level and 370 knots at low level whereas the JAA only allow Mach 0.84 and 350 knots. There is no difference between the airframes as our 757’s that operate with Ryan in the winter can do the higher speeds in the US but must slow down in the UK!

    Quito airport is at 9000 ft. Its runway is 3000 ft long which they say is too short to handle fully loaded jets. Heres a website in spanish that gives specs on the airport:
    http://www.ecuadortotal.com/aeropuerto/codigo/tecnicos.html
    you can translate it too english with this translater:
    http://babelfish.altavista.com/

    in reply to: hi alt airports #681693
    mixtec
    Participant

    What Im really curious is if its possible to fly any type of airline up to the 10,000 ft mark, which is why I mentioned Quito. I doubt a full size jet airliner could operate at such altitude, but how about a turboprop?

    in reply to: For the photographers… new affordable digital SLR #682100
    mixtec
    Participant

    I was looking at the website posted about this camera and it says its “feature reduced”. Does that mean that a person without any technical knowlege of photography would be able to use the features of this camera easily? And is this camera and the current generation of digital cameras using USB2 or is firewire still dominant?

    in reply to: Spitfire replica idea #401253
    mixtec
    Participant

    VW car engine, and your going to get an empty weight of 400 lbs? I dont think so. An even in a full size spitfire, you need a shoehorn to fit the pilot into the cockpit. In a half size replica you are going to have to wided the fuselage considerably which is going to make your spitfire look more like a YAK-1.

    in reply to: General Discussion #399567
    mixtec
    Participant

    Originally posted by VLM Flyer
    From a veterinary point of view, the German Shepherd is a wreck. They are prone to hip dysplasia (an inherited malformation of the ball and socket joint of the hip, in some cases the “socket” part is not there, rendering the dog severely lame).

    Ive heard the reason german shepherds have this problem is because they are bred to have the height of the hind legs lower than the front legs, purely for looks.

    in reply to: Dogs #1976717
    mixtec
    Participant

    Originally posted by VLM Flyer
    From a veterinary point of view, the German Shepherd is a wreck. They are prone to hip dysplasia (an inherited malformation of the ball and socket joint of the hip, in some cases the “socket” part is not there, rendering the dog severely lame).

    Ive heard the reason german shepherds have this problem is because they are bred to have the height of the hind legs lower than the front legs, purely for looks.

    in reply to: To Spin…or Not to Spin #401481
    mixtec
    Participant

    Originally posted by mike currill
    What difference does it make to the aitframe whether a spin is deliberate or accidental? as far as I can see, none at all hence the reason I think all trainers should be cleared for deliberate spinning.

    The difference is not about the structural strength of the aircraft but about aerodynamics. So your asking all the aircraft manufactures to redesign all their aircraft, taking performance penaltys to make a safe spinning aircraft?? Dont think it will happen. Its possible to make an aircraft almost spin proof, such as the Schwiezer 2-33 sailplane, but then what would be the value of spin training with a plane that wont spin?

    in reply to: To Spin…or Not to Spin #401485
    mixtec
    Participant

    Originally posted by mike currill
    Which brings me back to one of my previous posts which didn’t trigger a response from anyone much to my surprise.

    As I firmly believe that sin recovery should still be part of tthe PPL sylabus I feel that any aircraft certified as a trainer should be cleared for deliberate spinning. This would save the expense of doing the spin recovery exercise on an aerobatic aircraft, which all the local FTOs charge more per hour for

    I totally agree with you here, there should be a light aircraft designed specifically to be a trainer. Not neccesarily have aerobatic ability, buy simply have safe flying characteristics in all flight regimes be it in normal flying speed, slow flight, in stalls, spins, etc. (I even started a thread on the topic of what is the “perfect trainer” here a while back which was not responded too and eventually deleted)

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,348 total)