dark light

XF828

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 95 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Photo collection free to a good home #521924
    XF828
    Participant

    PM sent

    in reply to: Concorde Project On The Thames #1087730
    XF828
    Participant

    Given current worries about tsunamis and nuclear plants, will this Concorde jetty have tsunami protection? If so, that is about the only reason why it need cost 20 million quid!!

    in reply to: XM603 Update #1087732
    XF828
    Participant

    Poor I’m told. It is fenced off currently and has a damaged nosegear so it can’t be moved. It’s been outside for as long as I’ve been at Woodford (22 years) and is now green rather than white. Damned shame really.

    Goodness, it was white on 12 March, see posted phot just a few posts above yours!

    in reply to: RNAS portland (HMS osprey) #1087979
    XF828
    Participant

    Swordfish? That’s a new one on me.

    It was a very busy heliport for many years, Wasps and Wessexes galore when I was there. Never saw a single fixed wing movement, and considering the teeny tiny ‘practical joke’ runway (200 yds or so as I recall), that’s no surprise. Can’t find my copy of ‘Flashing Blades Over The Sea’ but I think it had some Portland phots in it.

    in reply to: XS458 pic and news on G-BMSG #1088576
    XF828
    Participant

    Looks like a Mooney.

    Don’t normally see fire crew attending XS458’s runs do you? Did something get a bit overheated?

    in reply to: XS458 pic and news on G-BMSG #1089020
    XF828
    Participant

    A sad end to a bit of Cranfield’s scenery, I remember when it was sparkling and lovingly looked after. What on earth happened to her?

    in reply to: Olympics – Duxford & Old Warden #1093373
    XF828
    Participant

    Microlight
    Self Launching Motor Glider
    Touring Motor Glider
    Airship
    Autogyro
    Paramotor
    All Helicopters
    All powered fixed-wing aircraft

    All these types are affected, and invited to comply with the restrictions.

    And if one were to decline the invite?

    in reply to: The Spitfires down a Australian Mine Story gets a Reprise #1104873
    XF828
    Participant

    So if a flying Spit is worth 2 million, and one in a buried crate is worth 6 million… can somebody lend me 2 million? I promise to give you back 3 million once I’ve buried it and flogged the location to an idiot.

    in reply to: The Spitfires down a Australian Mine Story gets a Reprise #1108572
    XF828
    Participant

    Obviously one of the experimental versions skinned in pure gold. There seem to be so many of these things buried down under that I am surprised none have come bubbling out of the liquefaction zones in Christchurch.

    in reply to: sea vixen #1110905
    XF828
    Participant

    I think a Se Vixen flight would have been well reported so I guess Matt just taxied it… come on PK and gang, get one up!

    I see there is a 7 page Sea Vixen article in Flypast this month. Apparently the DH-110 had guns in the wings. The Sea Vixen Mk.2 had a friable hatch (would have made life rather more exciting for the obsever). A phot of XJ565 at the Mossie Museum is captioned as XJ580 at Tangmere. Not a single phot of any frontline squadron aircraft. Must try harder – 4/10. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1145920
    XF828
    Participant

    I think it’s a crime that none of the flight-worthy MRA-4’s are being preserved though… I suppose they present too great an embarrassment to those involved.

    More like no museum wants to take on a very large airframe that cannot be delivered by air and will cost them huge amounts to dismantle, transport and reassemble on the space they may not have available to display it on. For what gain… a few days worth of extra visitors?

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1146151
    XF828
    Participant

    The really sad thing about MRA4 is not jobs, or loss of capability, or reduction in industrial base; it is this, from the Haddon-Cave report on the loss of XV230:

    But for the delays in the Nimrod replacement programme, XV230 would probably have no longer have been flying in September 2006, because it would have reached its Out-of-Service Date and already been scrapped, or stripped for conversion.

    The report contains an eye opening section on the MRA4 procurement fiasco (and was written before the cancellation), and one thing that is very clear is that this report may have been a significant pointer towards cancellation:

    In my view, these figures [average procurement delays 80%, average cost over-runs 40%, wasted money £900 million – £2.9 billion per year] are a matter of great concern. They give rise to the spectre of a further ‘bow wave’ of deferred financial problems which dwarfs anything faced in the late 1990s. My particular concern, for the purposes of this Report, is the knock-on effect which such a ‘bow wave’ might again have on the future integrity of safety and airworthiness in the MOD, in the event of further punishing rounds of stripping out or squeezing costs from In-Service Support and the concomitant change, confusion, dilution and distraction that this can bring, as in the past

    MRA4 was a disaster of a project, and clearly those who make the decisions felt it was in danger of becoming a disaster in the worst sense of the word.

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1146161
    XF828
    Participant

    And I can assure that you have been told is absolute rubbish.

    Why didn’t BAE deny it at the time it first came out then?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1412058/RAF-spends-billions-upgrading-the-Nimrod-but-now-the-wings-dont-fit.html

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1147041
    XF828
    Participant

    How many thousands of hours must the Nimrod fleet have flown through all the years that it was in service, and what was the loss rate of them? Was it 3 or 4?

    You misunderstand me – I asked what was so great about the MRA4. There is no doubt that Nimrod 1/2 provided sterling service to the nation when we needed it.

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Latest #1154815
    XF828
    Participant

    Will your Sea Vixen be making any noise in May?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 95 total)