last time you visited Waddington Airshow on base, on one of the public days?
Year before last, for about an hour which was more than enough. But please don’t tell me that the show has somehow drastically changed since then because I know it hasn’t – I know far too many people who went last year:)
Ah, the year the show was cancelled due to weather.
I imagine this claim is up there with your serving in the RAF/not serving in the RAF when called on it.
Well, this is the most I’ve ever been provoked into saying on here and probably the most I ever will…
I read this thread with disbelief.
An airshow director offers to take constructive criticism and is basically told “what’s the point”, while the detractor in question then suggests some intermittent aircraft taking off and coming back to land an hour later would be of more interest and recruitment value than kids being able to sit in aircraft on the ground and watch the RAF’s equipment being flown in a noisy demonstration right over the airfield?
I took my young nephew to Waddington last year and he was enthralled throughout, even the rain didn’t dampen his spirits because there was always another pilot to talk to or another aircraft to queue up for a look inside. All of which was forgotten when anything with a jet engine was displaying, of course. He came away firmly wanting to be a pilot – not any pilot – an RAF pilot (this is somewhat irksome as having a crab for a nephew would be personally embarassing). He also had a bloody good day out.
The disconnect from reality that Mr Chox is displaying is, without a doubt, the largest one I have seen demonstrated on this forum, and that is saying something. If he has ever served in the RAF, as he claims, I will eat my hat.
Colin Reeves, I wish you and your team the very best for this year’s show – I shall certainly be attending – nephew in tow. I warn you this year I am also taking him to Yeovilton, to see proper aeroplanes with “ROYAL NAVY” written on them!
XS581 hit the sea at night during an attack on a target towed by HMS Zulu, with (poor) illumination provided by a glow-worm flare (not the only such Sea Vixen loss). No ejections recorded for this accident. The addition of a third name may be an error as it is mentioned in none of the publications I have consulted. The crash was not ‘at’ Portland Bill but some 10nm away.
Clearly port wing. Longer edge of lights goes along wingspan on Canberra – topside camo is dark grey, underside is light aircraft grey, topside wraps round onto underside. How can this be such a long discussion!!
Some at Farnborough FAST museum too.