dark light

RMAllnutt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 358 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lockheed Hudson incident -Wakefield, Canada 1941 #1026258
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    The date could be wrong and the USN grabbed some Hudsons. If it is an RAF example, why does it not have the standard yellow tips?

    Yes, it’s also possible that the date could be wrong… but not the location, I am certain of that. I have no idea why a US Navy Hudson would be in this area. Yes, I was curious about the prop-tips too.

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Lockheed Hudson incident -Wakefield, Canada 1941 #1032486
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    The date could be wrong and the USN grabbed some Hudsons. If it is an RAF example, why does it not have the standard yellow tips?

    Yes, it’s also possible that the date could be wrong… but not the location, I am certain of that. I have no idea why a US Navy Hudson would be in this area. Yes, I was curious about the prop-tips too.

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Lockheed Hudson incident -Wakefield, Canada 1941 #1026362
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Paint on the prop tips looks more US Navy to me than RAF.

    I suppose it is possible it’s a very early Ventura, which did serve in the RAF/RCAF… doubtful it’s US Navy though, given the date.

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Lockheed Hudson incident -Wakefield, Canada 1941 #1032597
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Paint on the prop tips looks more US Navy to me than RAF.

    I suppose it is possible it’s a very early Ventura, which did serve in the RAF/RCAF… doubtful it’s US Navy though, given the date.

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Lockheed Hudson incident -Wakefield, Canada 1941 #1026375
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Looks about right Geoff

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Chemin+Mill,+Wakefield,+Les+Collines-de-l’Outaouais,+Qu%C3%A9bec+J0X+3G0,+Canada&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF8&ll=45.636082,-75.929947&spn=0,0.021887&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=6.881357,14.941406&geocode=FfJUuAIdbE95-w&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=45.635962,-75.929899&panoid=qxwnANZXw6bDOueYyssMAA&cbp=12,171.19,,0,0

    Electric cables now run behind the house.
    Plane could have been just pulled from the river.

    It is indeed that location. Wakefield is an old logging town, and there are very few new buildings in the area. Until relatively recently, they still floated the logs down the river from further north.

    The tracks you see by the water in the street view are the old railway tracks (which are still used in the summer months by an Swedish steam train that gives sight-seeing tours). The terrain is quite hilly, and would have been a difficult place to put an aircraft down. There are no local airfields I can think of either. My guess is that the actual forced landing occurred a little further afield, and that they disassembled the aircraft for transport to wakefield for loading onto a train (or barge). I’m really curious though if anyone has any crash records for Canada in this time period… it would be great to identify the aircraft, and what happened.

    Looking at the nose, I can just make out a three digit number. It looks very much like 293 to me. Does this ring any bells with Hudson serial numbers?

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Lockheed Hudson incident -Wakefield, Canada 1941 #1032603
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Looks about right Geoff

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Chemin+Mill,+Wakefield,+Les+Collines-de-l’Outaouais,+Qu%C3%A9bec+J0X+3G0,+Canada&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF8&ll=45.636082,-75.929947&spn=0,0.021887&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=6.881357,14.941406&geocode=FfJUuAIdbE95-w&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=45.635962,-75.929899&panoid=qxwnANZXw6bDOueYyssMAA&cbp=12,171.19,,0,0

    Electric cables now run behind the house.
    Plane could have been just pulled from the river.

    It is indeed that location. Wakefield is an old logging town, and there are very few new buildings in the area. Until relatively recently, they still floated the logs down the river from further north.

    The tracks you see by the water in the street view are the old railway tracks (which are still used in the summer months by an Swedish steam train that gives sight-seeing tours). The terrain is quite hilly, and would have been a difficult place to put an aircraft down. There are no local airfields I can think of either. My guess is that the actual forced landing occurred a little further afield, and that they disassembled the aircraft for transport to wakefield for loading onto a train (or barge). I’m really curious though if anyone has any crash records for Canada in this time period… it would be great to identify the aircraft, and what happened.

    Looking at the nose, I can just make out a three digit number. It looks very much like 293 to me. Does this ring any bells with Hudson serial numbers?

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1040584
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Are Scandinavian Vampires staying in UK a while? Can’t remember last time saw a single seater one.
    P-40F looks absolutely stunning and does the P-47 and 3 buchon’s in one place thats fantastic, LIke the colour schemes on the visiting P-51s too.

    I am really hoping I feel OK for this weekends show, Lost my Mum last week and have funeral tommorow and basically have not really faced many people since she passed. But I hope Legends will let me escape the grief thats around me at the moment.

    I know we don’t know each other, but I just wanted to say how sorry I am to hear of your mum’s passing. Each person handles their grief differently, as others have said, but I hope you manage to get out for a little respite at Legends. Take care, ok?

    All the best,
    Richard

    in reply to: Bell P-63 Kingcobra Project #1054650
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Welcome!

    Following a few requests from the “Cockpitfest” thread, I am creating this new thread about our P-63 Kingcobra project. Please feel free to contribute and if anyone has any P-39/P-63 parts then we would love to hear from you.

    Attached are a few photos, the first photo is of one of 6 P-63’s C models that were recovered from Eastern Russia, the one pictured has been set up in a “diarama” to represent the airfield that it was recovered from. This forms part of the “Ghosts of Tundra” display at the Wings Museum near Balcombe in Sussex, our B5N2 Kate is displayed opposite representing “friend & foe”.

    We also have 4 x sets of wings (one can be seen in the photo below) as you can see they are quite amazing with original Red Stars, we hope to be able to trade the spare wings and maybe a fuselage etc to help us move forward with our own project.

    The last photo was taken at Cockpitfest 2011, work commenced on the cockpit of 43-11137 during late July 2010. If anyone knows of any cabin doors then we would like to hear from you!

    Thanks for reading.

    Dan

    beautiful project! I have a couple of nice P-63 fuel gauges if you have any need for them. Happy to trade.

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Spitfire porn……(sorry) #1082084
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Amazing similarity of the camouflage tone and style on all ‘three’ Spitfires. 🙂

    Mark

    You’re right Mark12. Going even further, it’s pretty clear to me that it’s actually a model kit. Look at the photo full size, and you will see clear indications in the way the aircraft has been “weathered”. Also, the smoke staining from the guns looks way too defined and too long as well. There are other obvious giveaways too. Nicely done regardless though.

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Watson Lake, Alaska 1943-1945 #1096512
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Fascinating photos… thanks so much for posting. It rather made me think of my own grandfather whom I lost last week.

    All the best,
    Richard

    in reply to: Lancaster Front Section Build #1098291
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    After the pilots panel decal plates……..I really really hate that machine now.

    Very nicely made placards. Are you doing these yourself, and if so, what are you using to make them?

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: HMS Invincible to be Scrapped in Turkey #2011985
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    I thought the RN ran on tea…:diablo:

    No that’s the British Army… 😀

    Cheers,
    Richard

    PS. I know that from personal experience!

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1145925
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Of course they could have looked at a more modern design, after all the Boeing P8 is a development of the much newer 737, that didn’t take to the air until 9 April 1967! A real advance that will be, when it enters service, only 44 years old so far. Some real jokers on here lately……

    The P-8 is based upon the 737-800 and -900 series aircraft. If you think there is much in that aircraft which resembles the original 1967 brand, you are very much mistaken.

    As much as I love the Nimrod, the MRA-4 was a complete bast*rd child of a program, and was inevitably doomed to failure. The MOD tried to do things on the cheap, and we’ve all paid the consequences.

    Surely it would have been far more sensible to have gone with a modified, off-the-shelf modern airliner design than the route they took. No, you wouldn’t have had a traditional bomb bay, but this does not appear to have caused a problem with the P-8. I think it’s a crime that none of the flight-worthy MRA-4’s are being preserved though… I suppose they present too great an embarrassment to those involved.

    Richard

    in reply to: F4u wings #1088333
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Reading one of my model magazines, I was surprised the read in an artcile about a Corsair that the full size had fabric covered outer wing panels. Assuming some sort of misprint I checked, only to discover that it was correct. Given that the Hurricane started life with fabric covered wings but soon switched to metal, I was really surprised to hear this about the much later, much more highly powered, Corsair. Any idea why it should have adopted such apparently obsolescent technology?
    Mike

    All of the WWII Corsair marques had fabric covered outer wing panels. They had wooden ailerons as well. The early -1 and -1A variants had fabric covered outer wing flaps too. This was all done to save weight. Considering how effective the corsair was in combat, I’d hardly say the technology was obsolescent…

    Cheers,
    Richard

    in reply to: Sea King XV677 pics #1100953
    RMAllnutt
    Participant

    Beautiful work Seaking677! She looks magnificent!

    Cheers,
    Richard

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 358 total)