More info has leaked out but since it is from the media it is probably flawed.The last thread I started on the Crash was closed before I got to make a second entry but seeing some of the entries I was glad it was. 😀
I will let the chips fall were they may on this one but it DOES’NT appear to be the same problem of the YF-22 (software).
I really liked the looks of the proposed F-32. I had the pleasure of seeing the full scale mock-up (I didn’t take this photo).
Tiger Meet by Mark Costello
This is a model that was built to the a theme by an average Joe. The theme was called “What if?”. Various plastic kits are modified to appear to have entered service or its mission profile is different. Like an F-16 modeled as if it was carrier ready, C-130 has the props replaced with jets, that kind of stuff. It was a contest and they even had a website, but it is down.
Good disscusion though 😀
It’s hard to tell but I think we agree FrancisDeAssisi. 😀
F-14 Hotdog-you forgot to add potential FOD ingestion issues, potential head-on RCS issues, problems with the exhaust in VTOL mode, and a bunch of others. And what room for growth? The airframe was damn near packed as it was.
F-23 and F-35 more like. The F-32 might have been an acceptable F-18 and AV-8 replacement, but it would have had issues taking on some of the F-16s roles, such as air defense. More on this later.
SPACE/Room
The X-32 actually had a weapons bay the X-35 didn’t and clearly had no room.
The F-35 moved its main gear to a location like the X-32 and now it has room but I think the F-32 would have had much greater fuel capacity.
A2A
F-32 would have probably been lighter, after a fuel dump and it was to have thrust vectoring. The F-35 TV is an option that probably will never happen.
Cool
It was eliminated because McD didn’t follow the guide lines. It required the aircraft to use a single engine and McD added another for its lift fan.
Looks had NOTHING to do with it….until the X-32 🙂
Yak 141 used 2 small lift jets (small turbojets mounted vertically in the fuselage), not a single large lift fan like the X-35. It’s a concept that dates back to Dassault experiments in the 1960s.
LM paid a German company for use of the 3BSN design.
The clutch is essentially an adaptation of carbon-carbon wheel brake technology that couples the drive shaft and lift fan gearbox. The control laws to accomplish the shift from low bypass to high bypass would not be easy without a FADEC.
True.
The McD entry was actually more like the Yak-141. It was to use a single small lift jet which is why it was eliminated.
The Bird of Prey was actually a McDonnell Douglas project (IIRC). The X-32 was a Boeing project and when McD was eliminated it became part of Boeing and as such picked up part of the X-32 project.
Anyone remember the McD entry? Very sexy little V-tail. Need a pic?
I interrupt this bashing session to insert a public service message.
The Super Hornet is here to stay and all of your whinning isn’t going to change it.
Oh the F-14 is DEAD gone by 2007….get over it.
😀
Well at least I got my EA-18G hat/cap 🙂
That can be done on any modern jet.
Cool thanks,
I figured as much. The information I was given was for the Hornet so I didn’t want to say it was true for all. It does make sense though.
I heard that the F/A-18s flight computer can be overriden if the pilot feels he really needs too.
Am I missing something?
Are you guys saying that the MiG-25 is an agile fighter? Well, heck screw the lightweight composites stuff….Joe grab the arc welder we gonna build us a 5th generation fighter! 😀
This is actually good reading, I must start from the beginning.