dark light

Rick

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 142 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2617389
    Rick
    Participant

    Crobato,
    You’re full of cr*p.

    that means the provisions inside the contract wasn’t in the original contract signed in 1996.

    That also means that after a second contract, there are negotiable options for other contracts beyond that 200 number, if the procurement of other kits are desired.

    You’re only guessing. At least admit that it is speculation.

    They only cancelled the Russian kits. They did not cancel the J-11 production at all. Chinese forums are saying 110-120 planes—that was early this year. The 95 kits were already received since early last year.

    Pibu said that as of LATE last year there were 105 kits delivered which is absolutely consistent with what the Sukhoi official said. I’m sure you would rather rely on the Chinese forums over some who have consitent information and access to the inside. Stop spinning and stick to the facts. I’ve had enough of that during the US President race.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2634598
    Rick
    Participant

    The first one has a dark colored hatch.

    I think it may be because of the amount of light. If you look at the white hatch on the second one it appears darker than the third. You can also see a lighter/silver area just beneath the canopy on the other J-11s and UBKs but cannot see that area on the first UBK.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2635211
    Rick
    Participant

    Is there a pitot tube? I can’t see one.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2636686
    Rick
    Participant

    plawolf
    u can clearly see that it says ‘chinESE air force’ on the badge (which uses the right gramma).

    I think the emblem actually says “Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force” but I don’t mean to split hairs.

    My only point was I would expect a high caliber mainland magazine to use China Air Force because that is the way the PLA press renders it.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2636867
    Rick
    Participant

    So we are supposed to believe this plane has the five digit unit number and a unit emblem of some sort…all on a photo that isn’t in color. How convenient.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2636890
    Rick
    Participant

    Plawolf
    they have the PLAAF badge on the wing and tail, yet have ‘china air force’ in english on the side (which really should be ‘chinese air force’ at that). think they might be trying to make a political message?

    I’m surprised at you Plawolf. China Air Force is the translation for Zhongguo Kongjun on the magazine. As far as the use of English, even the logo for the 1st Division uses English.

    1st Div Emblem

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2659727
    Rick
    Participant

    notice the difference in the paint job on the vertical stablisers

    Su-27UBKs have always had this paint scheme, as have the Su-30s.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662078
    Rick
    Participant

    A few more quotes from China Today: Aviation Industry.

    “The J-8II was developed on the basis of the J-8 aircraft but significant improvements were incorporated.” Also, “The J-8 had more than 70 percent modifications over the J-8 and one thrid of its total vendor-furnished-equipment were replaced.” Also, the engines were replaced with the WP13As.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662614
    Rick
    Participant

    For ther record, there is NO mention of Ye-152A is the book. ALso for the record, the Z-8 section specifically mentions it as designed after a foreign helo.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662884
    Rick
    Participant

    Factoids on J-8 development from “China Today: Aviation Industry”

    May 1964 first meeting on J-8 project.
    Oct 64 ‘work on the conceptual definition” started
    Project approval May 17, 1965
    December 1965 wooden mockup reviewed
    Complete set of drawings released end of 1966
    Production documents early 1967
    First 2 J-8s were completed July 1968
    First flight: July 5, 1969 ((a year later……))
    “The J-8 design was based on the three years study of the Mig-21 design and on the investigation of foreign aircraft technologies. The selected design configuration for the J-8 was not only advanced but also similar to the previous Mig aircraft which had been put into production in China.”
    From 1969 to 1979: 1025 takeoff and landings and 663 flying hours. (average flight 38 minutes).
    Formally certified on March 2, 1980

    There were three flameouts in the J-8 before 1976 adn three more in October 1976. The hydrolic pump was a problem in the J-8I and the first plane burned on the ground during ground run-up tests on June 25, 1980.

    In the bablfish translation provided, notice it said the design was changed into a day fighter because the radar was not available.

    Design of the J-8I started Feb 1978 with first prototype done in May 1980.

    J-8I certified July 27, 1985.

    Sorry if some of this is redundant to all that has been said.

    in reply to: Chinese Il-76 at Zhukovsky #2662917
    Rick
    Participant

    That’s not Chinese. Chinese Il-76s don’t have the gunner/observer/refueling op position. Is that even an Il-76?

    in reply to: Chinese Il-76 at Zhukovsky #2663030
    Rick
    Participant

    In the second photo you can see there are numbers just below the logo. Do you remember what the number was?

    Rick
    Participant

    If you flip the photo horizontally, it looks like its a 13th Div Y-7 tail number. If so, that confirms its fake. They wouldn’t have one of these.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2666906
    Rick
    Participant

    Even as late as the first SIno-Vietnamese war in 1979 the J-7 was still a problematic aircraft being considered for the scrap heap. There were no more than three or four regiments of J-7s at the end of 1979.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2668042
    Rick
    Participant

    Training time using the J-6s and J-7s are virtually unlimited. Recently there are complaints that some pilots are being pushed to the brink of exhaustion, with over 300 flight hours.

    Is there any credible source for this or just internet rumor? It is hard to believe PLAAF flighter pilots can now get three times the flight hours they were getting three years ago, especially in light of the high priority the PLAAF puts on conserving fuel. Last year a pilot in Guangzhou set a new record for over 200 hours, but he was an instructor. This year, a pilot in the 3rd Div went over 300 hours. I suspect he is an instructor also and that the time in the backseat is being counted, giving the Su-30 pilots the extra hours.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 142 total)