dark light

Rick

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 142 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2077325
    Rick
    Participant

    elcid is not your average armchair private, he has serious credentials.

    John Glen has serious credentials but that doesn’t make him an expert on what China is doing with the Shenzhou project.

    There are a lot of problems with the Naval Aviation part of his document. The way I read it, he has any Chinese fighter flying on a carrier. That just doesn’t make sense. A gaf of that magnitude puts him more in the category of armchair private than a man having serious credentials.

    in reply to: Anyone wants to buy some surplus aircraft:) #2692288
    Rick
    Participant

    Arthur,
    I see you found the afterburner pic for your avitar.

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2693488
    Rick
    Participant

    The Lanzhou MR has only 2 fighter Divisions. The 6th and the 37th. The 6th Division has historically deployed aircraft to Lhasa. It will be interesting to see if the J-11s eventually take a turn at the deployment. The 37th Divison has received the J-7E in the past year. So there has been an attempt to upgrade the Lanzhou MR air forces in terms of equipment. If you are defending Beijing with J-11s at Zhangjiakou then it only makes sense to protect the west with modern aircraft as well. Taibei is only slightly farther away from Yinchuan than it is from Zhangjiakou.

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2693515
    Rick
    Participant

    by Huitong
    it could be Su-27s transferred from 2nd division which itself is getting Su-30MKKs

    Given the way the 3rd Div upgraded to the Su-30 it would be expected the 2nd Div would get the Su-30 before giving up the Su-27. Is there an Su-30 order out there beyond the Su-30MK2s for the Navy? Since the Navy order was first if the 2nd Div was giving up the Su-27s that would indicate that 2 Naval regiments of Su-30s and the one for the 2nd Div would have been delivered already. Doesn’t seem likely. Given the production rate at Shenyang the 3rd regiment was due to be delivered and this would seem to make the most sense. We will need some additional press realeases to help. I will acknowledge the limited press release info I have seen simply says new model fighter when I would have expected to see new domestic model does tend to support your theory.

    Someone needs to take the China United Airline flight to Yinchuan. :p If you buy, I’ll fly……

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2693558
    Rick
    Participant

    The ‘flying tiger’ J-11 belongs to the 1st Division. The same tiger has been seen on the J-7Es and J-8Bs of that unit.

    http://www.china-military.org/units/images/1div/J-8_13220_emblem.jpg

    in reply to: Velly Interesting news re: J-11s in PLAAF service #2693680
    Rick
    Participant

    The third regiment of J-11s is thought to be at Yinchuan. It now puts at least one Flanker regiment in each military region.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2659664
    Rick
    Participant

    I thought Dadui is a group.

    Shi = Division of 72 aircraft
    Tuan = Regiment. 3 Regiments per Div or 24 aircraft
    Dadui = Group. 3 Groups per Regiment or 8 aircraft.
    Zhongdui = Squadron. 3 Squadrons per Group or 2-3 acft per Sq.

    12 aircraft per dadui would mean 36 per regiment and 108 per division. The PLAAF has never had this many aircraft in a division but there are indications this may happen in the future once the PLAAF gets down to the size it wants to be. The assertion of 80 aircraft by 2005 and the confusion between J-11 and J-10 idicates the author of the news article is not deep in facts.

    If dadui was used, that would be 32 aircraft by mid-2005 and is a realistic number. Since there are likely to be a good number of J-10s in production even 2 full regiments of 48 like Crobato mentioned would be realistic. Probably should see the first regiment of J-10s sometime later this year.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2659985
    Rick
    Participant

    by Crobato
    Many Chinese articles tend to have bad english or bad translation.

    The article is from a Korean paper. If you check out the donga website’s English section you will see it is well written. There is no doubt he meant to say the J-10 was the Su-27. He likely just had his facts mixed up with the J-11. I do think he was in serious error in comparing a Chinese squadron (if the term used was really zhongdui) to the Korean elements. A Chinese squadron does not have 20 aircraft, it only has 3. That would put 4 squadrons at 12 aircraft, not 80. Without the actual Chinese text is nothing more than specualtion on my part. Having said that, there is no PLAAF unit that has only 20 aircraft except bomber/Su-30 regiments. It is unlikely the J-10 will be considered in that class and a regiment of 24-40 should be expected with 24 to start and likely to increase over time.

    in reply to: Chinese commies in foreign lands #2665672
    Rick
    Participant

    It does have the look of defection with all the guards but it is a J-6/Mig-19.

    in reply to: Chinas F/A-22 #2667996
    Rick
    Participant

    I should have gotten the exact quote. Here it is:

    “THis Suhkhoi official was also willing to talk about the PLA’s desire to “indigenize” the J-11 with substantial new Chinese-made components, like radar, engines and avionics. he said that the PLA was capable of doing all these things but that it would take the PLA “ten years” to realize an indigenized J-11″

    This was taken from Richard Fisher’s MAKS reports which can be found here:
    http://www.uscc.gov/mair1.htm

    By saying it would take 10 years to realize an indigenized J-11 indicates to me the Sukhoi official was saying it would take 10 years to develop all the components and has nothing to do with the contract. My point in posting this was to put the Sukhoi offical’s comments into perspective.

    The actual statement concerning the XXJ was that “China could master all the advanced technologies required for this new fighter, but that it would take 10 years for the PLA to complete the program. This would only put the XXJ about 6 yeasr behind the expected 2006 IOC for the F/A-22A”

    Was the offical saying it would take 10 years to master the technology? If so, that would put the XXJ ready for prototype in 10 years putting its IOC more than 6 years behind.

    Again, this is the same official that thinks there will be 1200-1500 J-10s. He just seems all over the map. He also said China has about 300 Sukhoi fighters.

    I think China can indeginize the J-11 in less than 10 years. I don’t think China will make 1200 J-10s and I see no reason to think China is ready to complete the XXJ in 10 years.

    in reply to: Chinas F/A-22 #2668355
    Rick
    Participant

    But the Sukhoi official at MAKS also said China would not be able to make a 100% domestic J-11 for 10 years. I don’t know how much credability he has.

    in reply to: Problems with the J-10 program? #2671636
    Rick
    Participant

    I may have saved the post. If I did, I’ll post it.

    in reply to: Problems with the J-10 program? #2671686
    Rick
    Participant

    It was on Dingsheng a few weeks back. I saw it also but didn’t put much stock in it. As I remember, the rationale was since Yunnan had 2 regiments of J-6. Seemed like more speculation than knowledge. Not much else to go by and I don’t know who posted the info. Huitong knows all those guys and knows whose info is more reliable. Makes little sense to me as well.

    in reply to: Problems with the J-10 program? #2671772
    Rick
    Participant

    Looking at the history of new aircraft deployment in the PLAAF if the J-10 goes to Yunnan that says something very negative to me. I know others will disagree saying that times could have changed. The PLAAF is a creature of habit and does things today the same way they did 40 years ago. The early J-8s went to Anshan first, as did the J-8IIs, and the J-11s. There were some quality issues with all these aircraft and having them operational close to the factory would be benificial. I think the failure with the assembly of the first two J-11s may have drove the decision to put them at Anshan, just in case.

    I think the 10 J-10s delivered actually went to the Flight Test and Training Center at Cangzhou. I have also seen indications the 9th Division has been doing transition (at least thoery) training into the J-10. That is actually where I think the J-10 will go because I don’t believe there are problems with the program. I think the information Huitong has was speculation based on the theory above: “out with the old, in with the new” which really doesn’t apply in this case. You would want a top of the line fighter to be defending something worth defending. In the case of the 9th Division, that would be Guangzhou and Hong Kong. Being in range of Taiwan would simply be an added benefit.

    in reply to: Holy Geesus mother of all scale modelers!!!! #2672071
    Rick
    Participant

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 142 total)