Actually, it is possible to theoretically detect GPS signals. Any antenna that recieves a signal will retransmit a small amount of the signal out again. That’s how the TV detector vans in the UK can find people with TVs who haven’t paid their license- they detect the TV signals re-radiated from the offenders TV aerials.
So even a passively receiving antenna could theoretically be detected.
actually no, GPS reciever are that just recieved only and don’t transmitter any back signal.how GPS works when sending locating data is by you have enter your present location into the reciever itself and the GPS will always spool data from that that sats locating you have enter over and over again it’s called spooling and the reciever will filter the correct info automaticly for you as long you enter the location your going correctly..also if you did send out a GPS signal back the US reserve the right to BOMB you.they consider any interfernce with any USA commucation sat ” AS A ACT OF WAR”
:diablo: :diablo: :diablo:
That doesn’t matter one bit, although the answer would be zero. You wanted to know of a SAM system Iraq had in 1991 that Seribia didn’t have in 1999. I gave you one, the ROLAND. At any rate, here’s the Coalition losses over Iraq in 1991:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/874338/posts
Anyway, are you going to make your point, or are you going to keep hiding behind repetitive questions?
this site listed alot of coalition aircarft that got shot down or damage that wasn’t reported by any major media .3 B-52G was damage due to SAM.seroriusly how accurate is this info?.
But as you mention that is only apparant to an object at rest. Perhaps on board a faster than light ship you wouldn’t even notice the transition… except that time for you will cease to effect your body and mind… trapped in an eternal prison of unlife the ship would continue to fly forever… till it hit something of course… or flew through something that slowed it down or speeded it up like a deep gravity pool/field.
hmm I ment that this so called space ships has to be light itself to travel light speed! no atom can match light [which is not a atom] except LIGHT!.just not physics possible only in movies and television this can be done.
[QUOTE=Scooter]Isn’t the Laser equipped 747’s fitted with the same IRST (i.e. AN/AAS-42) as the venerable F-14D? I have heard that it is a very capable System? If, that is true? Why aren’t other US Fighters so fitted? Wasn’t the Super Hornet also slated to recieve a IRST System too? :rolleyes:[/QUOTE
I know nothing what kind sensors is on that 747! you memtion about but for years now NASA using ground and sat based infra red sensors know what planets or moon composite is made of mostly frozen methnes or hydrogen much colder then water based ice that for sure!.
Not theoretical at all… science fact.
remember reading a science fiction short story where people were making a special type of glass that slowed down the speed of light. A guy out in the country was selling 20 year glass, which meant that it took 20 years for the light to travel completely through the sheet of glass. Such items were left standing in front of spectacular views and then after 20 years were sold to create a 24/7 moving real image for an inner city apartment that would last 20 years. The story itself revolved around some people wanting to buy this glass (which was better than most as 3-4 year glass was more common). Every once and a while the seller would look briefly back at his house to watch a woman inside moving around and would not be distracted till she left the front room area. Later they find out it is his wife who had died sometime earlier and he has memorised her routines so he can watch every move she made when she was alive… the image a ghost of a long buried person…
to travel at lght speed we have to be ghost liked no size or weight our human moleuclur human starture must be change completely!
It can behave like a particle but it is not a particle. It is effected by gravity like a particle but travels as a wave and does not accelerate and decelerate like a particle does. When light moves from air to water there is no gradual change in speed… when in air it travels at the speed of light in air and when in water it travels at the speed of light in water.
As mentioned above in some materials the speed of light is greatly reduced… but it is never variable in a homogeneous material… it is fixed.
Gary B is correct light speed will never slow down or speed up it’s constant also phototron are not soild matter or gas no size or weight if it did has atomic size and weight phototron would be listed in periods chart of elements. this why battlefield laser has no explosive power liked TNT,it’s just not matter just intentense heat radiation!..I know someone going ask what about nuclear exposition this is totally differnt story plutonium and uranium these are the most dense and heavy elements by atomic size and weight known by mankind!.and has atomic mass. where light t have no mass.
Can I include a F-4EJ?
REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHTS haha that very funny!.
Light is a wave, not a particle. It travels at one constant speed in a homogenous medium. Flying forward at 800m/s firing a cannon firing bullets that travel at 760m/s would not mean your shells would bunch up in the barrel because they were unable to reach the muzzle. The initial velocity of the shell would be 760m/s but compared to the stationary ground they would be travelling at 800 + 760m/s. If you replace the gun with a laser the beam would not get the 800m/s speed added to it, it would travel at the speed of light.
light is really just radition flashlight. laser pointers etc…and is not consider as matter liked a lead ball is.so to even match speed light speed is has to to be the same compsition no size or wigeth!.not possible at all to match even at light speed let alone to break it.
While I agree that USAF & LM tend to show the best part of the Raptor, I don’t think that the plane is far from what is advertised.
First, they didn’t hide the problems encountered during the development. The software integration, for once, delayed the IOC with some years. If they had tried to hide it, they would stick to the schedule.
OTOH, a plane that required 40 billion in R&D must be a revolutionary one, unless the Americans are complete morons or LM the biggest thief in the world.
Also, I don’t think that the USAF pilots are just reading add pamphlets edited by LM. You should consider that, unlike F 16 community (that enjoy a younger fleet) the mean age of F 15 is 18 years. That’s pretty old. It is just normal for any pilot to be thrilled when being among the first to fly a new plane (F 15, the last front line fighter was introduced in mid ’70)
About the IR suppression, there is a lot of folklore on the net: the “topcoat” the allegedly shift the IR radiation to a frequency that is harder to detect, the cooling of the hottest part using fuel, and so on. In fact, I believe that measures had been taken to reduce the IR signature, but probably those measures are far from what has been discussed.
Also, you should consider that even if they produced one of the best IRST in the world (the AN/AAS 42 of the F 14D) the Americans didn’t think that it could be the primary targeting device. May be they know better.
Besides, did you heard of any shooting down using an IRST, anywhere in the world?
even a soild block of ice will give off infra-red radiation ! and can be detected far out into space.
Any intake that allows radar to illuminate rotating compressor blades is naturally unstealthy.. There are many other aircraft like this: F-15, F-16, J-10, EF2000(?)…
what about diverless intake liked the the new F-1 04.will this cut down the radar signiture?.
what the spec for the Q-5J never seen this before on anywhere on net!.but the canaply looks outdated need to be change!.is that a wing fence? or part of the tail section?.hard to tell on pics anymore pictures?.
this WZ-10 shot’s doesn’t look liked a new pictures but a crop and enlarge from a previous pictures posted already in thread still the WZ-10 look very modern and good looking.
goodbye varyag
who knows
the first 6 pic are CG of a j-10.but the super-10 won’t look even close to thoses pic’s!.new wing plus a flat nose cone will be incorprated in the new super-10 design.
But china does have the ability to make Lith-ion battery cheaply. There are plants in shengzhen that mass produce these. But are they being placed on subs such as the newer 039G or the Yuan?
China has become one the largest battery produce on the planet very labore intenstives and very fifhty operration to manufatcure.I doubt most western contries can obey evorimental law!. most battery battery gears to PC manufacture anyway. plus the PLA don’t liked to look to outside state-controlled co. but this is changing!. 🙂 🙂 🙂