dark light

super sioux

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 255 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Piston engine deisgn #1276197
    super sioux
    Participant

    The radial engine evolved by putting more cylinders on to smooth out the power stroke, and putting more banks or rows or cylinders to increase the power and capacity, eventually having to use liquid cooling rather than air cooling due to the difficulty in cooling the rear banks of cylinders.

    Hence the early and inefficient 2 cylinder “V” radial evolved to being a 2 cyl, 6 row engine with liquid cooling, as the ultimate development of the radial engine:diablo:

    smiles

    Mark Pilkington

    Mark, you seem to be describing an inline engine, the main clue being that a ‘radial’ works best with an odd number of cylinders.
    Ray

    in reply to: Anniversaries in 2007 #1283263
    super sioux
    Participant

    Swedens first jet fighter the SaabJ21R flew March 1947.
    Boeings 707 and Lockheeds Electra also made first flights in 1957

    in reply to: Aircraft names #2510515
    super sioux
    Participant

    Am I mistaken, or was it also given the name “Rapier” by the USAF before they finally settled on “Raptor”? I’m almost certain I’ve seen that name in some early literature.

    The only mention of the name ‘RAPIER’ for a US aircraft that I know was the NAA F-108 a twin engined all weather interceptor which was to be capable of Mach 3. Cancelled in 1958.

    in reply to: Javelin FAW9(R) #1285787
    super sioux
    Participant

    Some Javelin F(aw) Mk 7 were modified to near Mk 8 standard becoming the Mk 9. Some had flight refueling facilities plumbed in becoming Mk 9(F/R) -four aircraft. A further mod. which included fitting the flight refueling probe and upto four auxiliary underwing tanks introduced into service the Mk 9R the ‘R’ standing for range. Total of Mk 9R’s was sixty nine. Sixty Squadron had twenty two Mk 9R’s which meant they were the main user.

    in reply to: aeroplane recognization #1286899
    super sioux
    Participant

    Are you sure it’s a tank? Very see-through tracks on it.
    Wasn’t there a few experiments with tracked undercarriages on various aircraft. I know I’ve seen photos of things like Piper Cubs with tracked units for landing on rough ground. Can’t explain what looks like a gun on the front though. And that definitely looks like a drive sprocket.

    The tank could be one of Christie’s designs. One of them owing to his advanced suspension design was to be released from a moving aircraft at 60 mph on touchdown!

    in reply to: British Sleeve Valve Engines #1286917
    super sioux
    Participant

    Napier :rolleyes:

    The Napier Nomad E145 was a two stroke diesel thus had no valves!
    Information from Bill Gunstons ‘The development of Piston Aero Engines’. If the engine had been fully developed the Shackleton fitted with it would have
    had increased power by 65% and range with existing tankage increased by 35%.

    in reply to: Catalina Mk1-of 333Sq info needed #1291939
    super sioux
    Participant

    Hi mhuxt, Have checked with ‘Coastal , Support and Special Squadrons of the RAF’ by John D R Rawlings and can confirm that you are right about the Sunderlands in 330 Squadron. In ‘Flying Cats’ they only mention the Catalinas in use by 330 Squadron. The Rawlings book does mention an attack by Sunderland mark 3 piloted by Lt. Johnsen of 330 Squadron on a surfaced U-boat! The front gunner was killed, the U-boat damaged and the Sunderland returned on 2 engines.

    in reply to: Catalina Mk1-of 333Sq info needed #1292185
    super sioux
    Participant

    Hi Super Sioux:

    Does the book say whether U-668 was also attacked earlier that day by the 330 Sqn Sunderland?

    The uboat.net guys seem to think this is the case, having changed their mind from an earlier assessment that the Sunderland attacked (and sank) U-240 (which, having read the entry in the relevant ORB, sounds pretty plausible).

    Hi mhuxt, there is no mention of Sunderlands in 330 Squadron, have you made a mistake? U-668 was sighted after midnight by the 333 Squadron CATALINA and attacked.
    U-423 was attacked and sunk by FP183 of 333 Squadron on the 17/6/44 with the use of a 6 depthcharge attack. Maybe this is a better subject for Chris?
    Ray.

    in reply to: Catalina Mk1-of 333Sq info needed #1293573
    super sioux
    Participant

    Just another twist in the saga of ‘Jossing’ versus U668. According to ‘Flying Cats’ by Andrew Hendrie published 1986 by Airlife the U668 was not sunk only damaged! The pilot of FP121 Sub-Lt Harald Hartmann met the captain of the U668 after the war when Wolfgang von Eickstedt was a priest in Hamburg and they became friends and thus the author had personal accounts from the two former antagonists a unique event in his study of such combats.
    Chris was right about the 6 depth charges dropped but the U668 applied hard rudder and escaped damage from the depth charges. In the mass sinking after 8/5/1945 of Uboats, U688 finally met her end.
    FP121 served with 202-210 Squadrons, then Norwegian Flight 1477 of Coastal Command finally 333 Squadron.
    Chris you have done a mighty fine painting, sorry I cant help with the aircrafts codes and paint scheme
    Ray

    in reply to: Mystery model #1295708
    super sioux
    Participant

    Have just enlarged the photo of Ian’s model and it seems to be radial engined! So was I wrong about the Bf 108 or was it a modelmakers mistake?
    Ray

    in reply to: F-84F Thunderstreak #1295725
    super sioux
    Participant

    Concerning the armament of the F-84G, I was looking at Aviation Enthusiast Nineteen and noticed an article on F-84’s in Korea. They are equipped with TWO 500 LB BOMBS! I think due to the lack of thrust from the Allison J35-A-29 axial-flow turbojet rated at 5600 lbs. The mention previously of this problem with Republic’s early jet aircraft is proved again. They also used JATO although this did not always prove satifactory until longer runways were built. That is why they were one of the first aircraft to be fitted with flight refueling receivers and could chug over from Japan!

    in reply to: Mystery model #1295909
    super sioux
    Participant

    The nearest I have seen is the Bf 108 Taifun (887 built in Germany). How good a representation is the model? The 108’s undercarriage retracts like the model’s! There should be one flying somewhere as it was built after the war in France and reported still flying in my 1980 book which has a photo of the Bf 108.

    in reply to: Vulcan RATOG use ? #1303183
    super sioux
    Participant

    Have just read again the trouble the overladen Vulcans had on takeoff from Ascension Island on the Black Buck missions. This was just the time and place for the use of RATOG!

    in reply to: Vulcan RATOG use ? #1303640
    super sioux
    Participant

    The Vulcan books I have perused contain not a hint of RATOG, shall try to find other sources, but think you may have been misinformed.

    in reply to: 1947 air crash near Naples #1306820
    super sioux
    Participant

    How about Mr Aghanur Harouthunian being an enemy spy who has been captured and is being taken back under armed guard (ie Private Edmund James Dilley, 19, 1st Btn, The Royal East Kent Reg) and under the watchful eye of the MI6 agent who caught him (Mr Thomas Simon Coates Gill)?

    Just clearing up a bit of work that should have been done before May 1945!

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 255 total)