dark light

super sioux

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 255 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wyvern vs MiG-17 Suez 1956 #1198805
    super sioux
    Participant

    ‘AIR WARS and AIRCRAFT’ by VICTOR FLINTHAM page 52 covering the Suez affair says ‘ During the day the paras made excellent progress, though not without casualties. FAA units flew continuous ‘cab-rank’ patrols and were called on to specific targets by liaison team dropped with the first wave of troops. During one such attack on the Coastguard barracks between Gamil and Port Said proper, Wyvern WN328 was seriously damaged and was ditched in the sea, the pilot being rescued unharmed. The author then mentions two Wyverns were lost in total but no further details given. Is WN330 the other Wyvern?

    in reply to: What book/s started you off as a kid? #1206391
    super sioux
    Participant

    Wartime Reading!

    The first book I remember reading was about the adventures of Wimpy the bomber bought for me during the war (the real war) with line drawings and adventures in Europe and the Far East. When older my Uncle Arthur gave me his copy of aircraft recognition RAF wartime types. He was a fitter on Halifax bombers.
    Ray

    in reply to: The Seamew Story Film #1216557
    super sioux
    Participant

    Short Seamew

    [ATTACH]173752[/ATTACH]

    Here are a few items from the Flight magazines of 1954.
    Ray [ATTACH]173753[/ATTACH][ATTACH]173751[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The Seamew Story Film #1218183
    super sioux
    Participant

    Hi Avion Ancien

    Thanks for your interest and copy of the Seamew Ad. There was a series of similiar advertisements running at this time. It would nice if we could get a full set.

    Here is a Flight advert. from 12 March 1954. Is this a darkroom trick? Or a brave pilot!
    Ray

    in reply to: History GCSE today – Discuss #1224603
    super sioux
    Participant

    I have just finished reading ‘ D-DAY BOMBERS : THE VETERANS STORY by Stephen Darlow published by Bounty Books 2007. The British and American heavy bombers were ordered to aid the land forces whilst still at the same time bombing German and occupied countries industry and transport. Air Chief Marshall Harris in a letter to Portal about the lack of publicity for the RAF for April, May and after the invasion up to the 28 June 1944
    when the British Army had 2500 killed and the US Army approx. 5000 since the 6 June . The RAF Bomber Command alone had 6038 killed wounded and missing. 5084 are missing of the missing we know from experience only 20% survive! Thus we have 2.5 more killed than the British army and more than the US Army: add to this T.A.F; Coastal, A.D.G.B. and 38 Group. After this letter the Air Ministry gave more air staff time to publicity so the story of the RAF before during and after the invasion could be given to the general public.

    in reply to: How to confuse the Chino Anoraks… #1167035
    super sioux
    Participant

    Where I am at this moment you cant see the smog for the rain!
    Ray

    in reply to: Dambusters remake Lanc unveiled #1184992
    super sioux
    Participant

    Now the Chinese can make Lancasters what about a Stirling? They can use the one they have hidden for a template!
    Ray

    in reply to: Lybian and Egyptian Air Forces around 1977 #1189714
    super sioux
    Participant

    According to the Flight edition of 2 July 1977 in the Worlds Airforces Article the LARF had been substansially supplied with Soviet military equipment in the previous year. Many Russian advisors were working in the country. Mig-23 interceptors 2 squadrons. Mig -27 strike aircraft and a few 2 seat Mig-23U’s totaling some thirty aircraft, a few Tu-16 bombers and a squadron of 12 Tu-22 Blinders. These last mentioned aircraft are possibly partially Soviet crewed, and some sources have put the inservice figure as low as FIVE machines! In service are 60 Mirage 5D fighter bombers, thirty 5DE intercepters, ten 5DD trainers and ten 5DR reconnaissance aircraft. The transport arm remains largely Western equipped with eight C-130E Hercules, nine C-47’s and a VIP Jetstar. Nine Super Frelons for ASR and ASW, 12 Mil-8’s, 3 Bell 47G’s, ten Alouette Threes, and three Alouette Two’s with a single Agusta built AS-61A-4 on order for VIP duties. Twelve ex French Air Force Fouga equip the training units, together with three T-33A’s and two Mystere 20 Mirage radar trainers. As stated at the begining of the message this was what the Libyans were equipped with at the time of the little war with Egypt in July 1977! Years later they were much better equipped and attacked large countries like Chad.
    In July 1977 the Egyptian Air Force currently operated mainly Russian equipment and total numbers reflect aircraft acquired and not necessarily those operational! A bomber force has some 25 Tu-16 Badger G’s, some armed with AS-5 Kelt ASM’s, and a similar number of IL-28 light bombers. Fighter bomber units are equipped with about 120 Su-7’s, although some suggest a figure nearer 80, and nearly 150 Mig-17’s which also double in the low level intercepter role. To help maintain the Mig’s, China has provided spares and about 30 engines. Also in the strike role is a Mig-27 Flogger D unit with 18 aircraft first seen the year before in the annual military parade in October. Also noted were 16 Su-20 variable geometry attack aircraft out of a possible 48 relinquished by Russia.
    Interception missions are flown by some nine squadrons in Air Defence Command equipped with 108 Mig-21MF’s integrated into a Soviet established air defence system which includes SAM’s and radars. In addition there are about 150 Mig-21PFM’s and about 100 F attack aircraft ; a number equipped for reconnaissance. Supplementing these are about 24 Mig-23 Flogger B interceptors, six two seat Mig-23U Flogger C combat trainers, and 38 Mirage IIIEE’s originally ordered by Saudi Arabia for operation by Egpyt. A few Mig-19’s remain in service but in second line service. This then is most of the EAF in service in July 1977 of course they had the usual support aircraft but I leave that to other subscribers to this query.
    Ray

    in reply to: Lybian and Egyptian Air Forces around 1977 #1190758
    super sioux
    Participant

    A Short War!

    According to ‘AIR WARS AND AIRCRAFT’ by Victor Flintham published by Facts on File 1990 the short war was started by Libya firing artillery across the Egyptian border in July 1977 and Egypt responded with infantry and tanks on the 21 July attacking the Libyan village of Musaid, whilst radar sites were attacked by Egyptian Air Force Su20’s and Mig21’s. On the first day of fighting a Libyan Arab Republic Air Force(LARAF) Mirage and an Egyptian Air Force (EAF) Mig were claimed destroyed, both to SA-7 fire. On the 22 July the EAF bombed Gamal Abdul Nasser Air Base (El Adem) in retaliation for air strikes on border villages; several aircraft were destroyed on the ground. Fighting continued to the 24 th when President Sadat ordered an end to Egyptian operations. By this time the two sides had lost at least six aircraft each, but the EAF had destroyed numerous radar and control units across the border and also attacked the airstrip at Al Kufra.
    Will look further for info. on strengths during 1977.
    Ray

    in reply to: World's Oldest Independent Air Force #1193699
    super sioux
    Participant

    The real truth!

    Tell me, why on earth does it matter? How does the when have any bearing on anything? How independent was ANY Air Force at that time? Remember, much of the work done by the RAF on the 1st of April 1918 was PRECISELY the same as that carried out on the 31st of March. And, as you almost certainly know Martti, that a great deal of that work was at the direct request of the Army. Contact patrols to cover any advance, aerial reconnaissance, photographic reconnaissance, artillery observation, bombing. I think your understanding of the term independent is wrong. You are looking at it all literally when actually the services were interdependent on each other.

    Regards,

    kev35

    Just a few lines to help set the above message in LEGAL jargon.
    According to the excellent book ‘ The Paladins’ by John James published by Macdonald 1990. The British Prime Minister Lloyd George in AUGUST 1917 persuaded the War Cabinet to set up a sub-commitee to consider (a) home defence against air raids, and (b) the existing organisation for the study and higher direction of aerial operations. The first recommendation , produced in a fortnight, was that air defence of the capital should be brought under a unified command. This was done. The second recommendation came at the end of August. It urged the the creation of an independent Air Staff backed by an independent Air Ministry. The War Cabinet accepted this recommendation. The final result, in the creation of the RAF as it came out by the end of the year, is obviously the Royal Flying Corps as devised in 1910 by Henderson and Sykes, with detailed changes in light of war experience. The bill to set up the structure was drafted and became law by the end of November 1917. Trenchard became the first Chief of Air Staff in November 1917. Thus the organisation was in use well before April First 1918 which was the day selected to set the Royal Air Force as the nations only aerial force.
    Ray

    in reply to: Which Pembroke is this? #1162083
    super sioux
    Participant

    Pretty in pink!

    It’s a german one.
    54+15 c/n 1006

    It was painted that way for some film work.
    I don’t know what happened to it.

    I think it died from embarassment!
    Ray

    in reply to: Smoking jets #1197265
    super sioux
    Participant

    Strange that you should say that, and really shows how subjective this is, but in my younger spotting days we could always tell at a distance an ‘American’ Phantom by how dirty the air was behind it compared to an RAF one. We used to call them Smokey Joes.
    Starfighters could lay some serious smoke aswel.

    When I was in the RAF in the sixties we called them Smokey Joes as well, but the smokiest plane I ever saw taking off was at RAF Nicosia about 1961 in the summer when the temp. was about 100 degrees F. the aircraft in question was a Fairchild 119-G transport of the Norwegian Air Force supporting some UN setup in the middle east. It was trying to obtain enough speed for takeoff with the engines roaring at full bellow and the oily smoke hiding everything behind for hundreds of yards it hadnt left the runway when it disappeared from view behind a hangar and I waited for a nasty sound but it dropped off the edge of the plateau, managed to claw its way down the hill until it started to climb a little, luckily the contour continued to drop until it reached sealevel at Famagusta!

    in reply to: Armstrong Whitworth Ablemarle #1207591
    super sioux
    Participant

    hi all,

    i find myself with a problem, these aircraft were skinned with plywood, do’s anyone know how the plywood was fastened to the tubular frame, and were the fasteners visible from the outside, or were they covered in fabric?

    thank you for any help given.

    ps, are Armstrong Whitworths records/drawing/photos kept at coventry museum?

    Have just spent half an hour searching around the house for a book that should help answer your question. Its title is ‘Aircraft for the Royal Air Force’ subtitle The ‘Griffon’ Spitfire The Albemarle Bomber The Shetland Flying-Boat.
    Author Michael J.F.Bowyer printed by Faber & Faber 1980.
    The author states that the wood would be fastened to the structure with synthetic resin glue without intervening fabric. But fabric covered the outside!
    The Albemarle was the most expensive aircraft built up to that date £6 million pounds for development, twelve sets of of airframe parts and two prototypes!
    The previous most expensive aircraft which had been cancelled cost £500 thousand for the airframe and £300 thousand for the engine which was used in other aircraft thank goodness!
    If you can beg borrow or buy this book do so..
    Ray

    in reply to: Aircraft-Carrier ‘Clemenceau’ Heading for Britain #1210528
    super sioux
    Participant

    Even the French joke about it!

    In a Parisian paper is a cartoon showing the Clemencau leaving France and two French sailors ashore watch the event. One says ” Battle of the Nile, Trafalgar. Another French warship goes to be destroyed by the English!”

    in reply to: Changi 1961 #1211994
    super sioux
    Participant

    Twin engined DC 4 ?

    Am I the only person to see the DC 4 as twin engined ? The photographer took the picture from a position which suggests only one engine per side !
    I well remember TMA from 60-62 at Nicosia, Singapore seems a long way from their usual Middle East stomping ground. Maybe they were on a charter?
    Excellent photos.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 255 total)