What strike me is that some people are ready to envisage any possibilities, even the most unlikelly ones, but can’t take as a hypothesis that the Rafale is just a better plane than the EF.
Even the French here are polite enough to be very carefull with it to not shock any sensibilities (even though they have less inhibition on French forums).
Nevertheless there are arguments to support this hypothesis and to tell you franckly that’s what I actually believe. I tell them for the reccord, no bragging intended:
– Dassault has much more experience with advanced fighter than the EF team. Much more. Especially with the Delta/canard/FBW configuration. The Rafale is closer to the Mirage 4000 than a lot of people think so that it’s almost unfair for the EF 😮 (Rafale development cost should almost be counted as Rafale + M4000 costs). The 4000 flown up to 1997 for testing!
– now there is the argument that the EF team are 4 nations vs 1. It’s really a misleading argument. Dassault staff never made smear campaign against the EF but they still said some. There is one I tell here just because it make it easier to understand:
“the addition of several incompetence has never made excellence: it just makes a BIGGER incompetence”. Take it easy, again it’s just to transmit the concept without flame intended.
Think about it: if size was always the main factor to be good, General Motors wouln’t be in the state it is by now…
– now the argument of more funding for the EF. And again the experience argument. Advanced fighter business is a highly evolutionnary business. When Toyota entered Formula 1 championship they did not win the first year in spite the means poured in (nor the 2nd, the the 3rd btw….)
– the French never missed any generation nor 1/2 generation. The 2000-5 is the equivalent of the F16 blk 50 and we’ve never lorst any significant ground. The teams has always been carefully kept togather and busy, ready to assimilate little by little new tech’, new concepts, new improvments on the details. Unlike the Tornado team.
BTW Thales is one of the world biggest professionnal electronic brand and our public education system is very elitist to pull to the top of the pyramid the most brilliant elements of the nation, especially in the nuclear, armament and aviation area.
So agree or disagree but it makes sens.
And please, let’s avoid the ‘fan boy’ trade mark, there are not passion here, just reasonning.
Concerning the ROE of the ATLC we don’t see anything but degraded Mica and concerning the other exercices we have more the feeling that the EF tried to avoid the Rafale to date than the contrary.
=> the 01/10/2010 the Rafale own officially the “second best” titlle in AA, it’s now up to the EF to take it back during another meeting 🙂
Saturday, 09 January 2010 | Printable
In Plateau, purchase of Rafale is a closed question
References in favor of rival fighters in the second report will be discarded
Denise Chrispim Marin and Vera Rosa
The government Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva agreed that the Rafale-C, the French company Dassault, fits into a larger project of defense and therefore must be chosen from the F-X2 program to acquire 36 aircraft for aviation combat. The final word depends on the last items on the price of that lot, estimated at $ 10 billion. Based on this choice has already consolidated, the Presidential Palace has decided to discard any favorable reference to the other two fighters competing in the second report of the Air Force Command, delivered Wednesday to Defense Minister Nelson Jobim. The document does not establish order of preference.
In return for the Air Force, which will have its analytical work in perspective in the final choice, the Plateau rule out the possibility of punishment to the command of the recent leak of the draft text of the report F-X2, confidential and dated September 2009. According to a worker of President Lula, the attitude was “deliberate”, “serious” and harmful to national security. But, he wondered, the responsibility for the act “of a Brigadier” can not be imposed on the commander of the Air Force, JUnit Saito, whose “loyalty and integrity are unquestionable.”
In an interview on French TV channel, the advisor for international affairs, Marco Aurelio Garcia, ironically the crisis. “With this controversy, the prices of fighters tend to fall.”
For the Plateau, the most important reports is the lack of veto to the three competitors. Since the beginning of the F-X2, three other fighters were scratched by the FAB. The clincher, the point of view of the Presidency, is not present in the military-technical analysis, but the evaluation of strategic and industrial policies. In this aspect, the Rafale would have no rival.
According to the same developer of Lula, the F-X2 is part of a larger project of the Government for defense, which includes the standardization of the entire fleet of fighter aircraft in the country, including an embedded version for trimming a future aircraft carrier to be built in partnership with France.
The package that begins with 36 units will involve the purchase of a total of 120 fighters. In this plan, there are three requirements: technology transfer, subject to market and sovereignty unrestricted use of aircraft.
The negotiation between governments finalized last September 7 in Brasilia, the resistance of France at some points had been dropped. The initial cost of hours of flight, estimated at U.S. $ 14 thousand in the case of the Rafale, fell to $ 11 mil.
Dassault has given assurances that the jets made in Brazil, with the transfer of its technology, will have Latin America as a captive market. The French company will not enter the race futures contracts traded in the region.
With Boeing, maker of the F-18 Super Hornet, there is the restriction of access to source codes of the digital electronics board. It also weighs the risk of veto by the Pentagon to future sales of military aircraft manufactured in Brazil to other countries, as in the episode embargo Super Tucano light jets from Embraer to Venezuela, under the argument that employ components made in the USA .
Appointed as the best option in the report of the Air Force, Gripen NG, the Swedish Saab, brings two intractable problems, from the point of view of the Presidency. The first is the fact that its only engine is manufactured by American GE, which would result in the same risk of interference from the Pentagon in future business operations.
The second drawback relates to the cost of the Gripen, named as the cheapest in the report of the Air Force. The Plateau considering that the estimates are misleading because only 40% of the project that got off the jet. “This game is not the end necessarily the cheapest,” said an aide to Lula.
http://www.estadao.com.br/estadaodehoje/20100109/not_imp492973,0.php
The initial cost of hours of flight, estimated at U.S. $ 14 thousand in the case of the Rafale, fell to $ 11.000.
To be compared with the $10000 evaluated by the dutch for the NG
I’m a personal friend of the Folha de Sao Paulo Bureau Chief in Brasilia, he has read the leaked FAB documents and insists that they represent the LATEST report, not the first one.
Regards,
Hammer
It’s surprising because the were given the orders in October to not make the ranking. Because to weight each criteria is not military’s business.
Anyway very good job from the Brazilians. They really got the best deal they could ever dream of, and more than that. The French are naked now :rolleyes:
A more fair comparison would be the Super Hornet.
You make a valid point here.
But the competition is so tough here that’s is undestandable to preview as low a possible without margins (concerning costs), especially when it’s just a number to change in a slide contrary to the others who base their quotation on real data.
Lastly Saab can engare for itself but not for its sub-contractors, nor the brazilians who’ll be included in the projects.
What worry me particulary it’s the AESA radar.
I don’t put in question SAAB seriousness. Just that the risk isn’t null.
And shall I once again remind you that the Gripen NG Demonstrator is flying? All metal and carbon fiber, no paper plane…
The first F35 demonstrator flown long ago.
You base that on the aircraft being relatively cheap? Or do you have any sources for this claim?
I base it on the F35, A400M, A380, B787, etc, story.
As long as the plane isn’t declared operational, it’s paper specification, paper planes and paper planed invoices.
Even when it’s garantied price, like the A400M, I’m ready to bet with you 1 million $ that the states are going to pour some more money in (or cancel the whole stuff which doesn’t worth more)
The Folha newspaper, the same who broght out the leakage of FABs report, says that it believes that the proposed unit costs – including 5-year post-sale support, training package and some armament (not much!) – is: Gripen US$ 70 Million, F-18 US$100 Million and Rafale US$140 Million.
How reasonable do these number seem to you?
Regards,
Those price are from the September evaluation, before price negociation and before the decision to grant the same price for the FAB as for the AdA (i-e: production costs and R&D is not paid back)
Now the Rafale remain more expansive than the Gripen but I’d bet on 50% more, not 100%
Let’s not forget too that the Gripen prices are like the plane itself: ‘paper prices’.
I tend to agree however that the Gripen is a more favourable option concerning business and it’s the reason why it’s the favorit of the industry probably.
But let’s not forget what weapon are made for basically. They are the tools for sovereignty.
If your priority is independance you’ll choose the one which bring 100% of the tech’, and who owns it without string attached (which could be a good point for business too of course)
Now it depends on the priority you have.
That’s why the choice is a political one and that’s why Jobin has asked the FAB in october to make a report about each points according to each criteria but to NOT make a classification.
It’s perfectly easy to understand and easy to explain. Because it’s the politician’s business to weight each criteria according to the policy he wants to implement (the one he has sold to his voters).
Edit: edited 😀
Nelson Jobim: “airmen: technical evaluation, the policy: everything else” , he recalled in late December in the same newspaper.
As it’s a leak, one can even wonder whether the “rating” we see is the “overall one” or only the “costs one”.
Actually they talk about everything but technical evaluation :rolleyes:
Is is clearly an answer of the Gripen side in the little press agents wa-war to the good points made by the Rafale at the end of last year.
this is exactly what i was after! nice info c-seven!
Thanks but it is not “info”. It’s pure speculation. A point of view in other words.
But how do they cope a radars signaltags, and be able to predict the modes? And how well are these system works?
Still the mirror analogy. If you light up your bathroom with green light, or red light, the mirror still works.
With the DRFM you use the incoming signal, whatever it frequency, wave length, etc.
You treat if (amplify, delay…), you make it interfere with the pre-recorded “image” depending of the incoming angle and you spit it back.
Of course, as usual, everything become complicate when it’s real world. But the principle are not always (the principle of a atomic bomb is not complicate…)
maybe some of you guys should google active cancellation and radar return transmitted deception
2 very different things
That’s exactly the same thing. What some call “active cancelation” is just an improvment of the previous. It’s not something revolutionnary that appeared from nowhere suddenly.
If you take the mirror analogy, you must here have a “pre-reccorded” RF picture of the plane inside the “mirror”, which pre-reccorded image will interfere with the incoming signal to make a return signal supposed to cancel the real RF image. Thus: the DRFM….
… and a pre-reccorded image for each incoming angle…. There’s probably a complete RF map of the plane in the “active cancelation” system (for those who believe in this possibility of course…)
That’s why a Rafale spent one year in anechoidal chamber

and the 2000D before

Now the more the image is ‘regular’, ‘low’ and without ‘contrast’, the more the system works well. That’s why I’m personaly convinced that the ‘stealth’ shape of the F22 is only half of its stealth, the second half being active means.
Rafale has ‘only’ this second half.
Just my 2 cents.
(now waiting for the men in black knoking at the door… ;))
considering cancellation, you don’t have to have “faster than light adaptation”
+1
People reason to much a “digital” way :rolleyes:
A mirror doesn’t have to know everything of the incoming light signal to reflect it properly.
Now take a RF mirror that ‘hold’ the return signal for a half phasis and you got the idea of your modern ECM more or less. That the ‘hold’ which make it complicate but the idea is that the ‘M’ of DRFM means “memory”.
No need for area 51 tech, it’s on wikipedia 😀
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_radio_frequency_memory
A DRFM system is designed to digitize an incoming RF input signal at a frequency and bandwidth necessary to adequately represent the signal, then reconstruct that RF signal when required. The most significant aspect of DRFM is that as a digital “duplicate” of the received signal, it is coherent with the source of the received signal. As opposed to analog ‘memory loops’, there is no signal degradation caused by continuously cycling the energy through a front-end amplifier which allows for greater range errors for reactive jamming and allows for predictive jamming. A DRFM may modify the signal prior to retransmitting which can alter the signature of the false target; adjusting its apparent radar cross section, range, velocity, and angle. DRFMs present a significant obstacle for radar sensors.
Another prob’ here is to re-emit the signal of the same nature as the incoming one, that’s why SPECTRA has AESA antenna (up to 8 according to certain sources/rumors)
Let’s also note that once the ECM is on, it re-emit everything, even the RF noise of the environment (i-e: you don’t have to know that someone try to detect you to be “invisible”)
And secondly such systems consume much less energy than power jamming because the incoming signals are very low power, and return one even lower.
Now I certainly don’t know if such system is enough to jam a APG-77 and nobody know.
Bonne Année BTW
-Gripen leading on Price but the FAB isn’t sure that SAAB and vixen could deliver the NG on time. Plus the reliability of technical infos given as been called into question.
I remember we’ve been flamed by some Swedish guys when we dared to put some SAAB data into doubt. Especially on the radar.
It seems we’re not the only ones…
In business we see this sometime: a company which is going out of business, which clame anything for any price to survive one more week. That just f*ck-up the market but it’s usually better to keep away.
Regarding the UAE I take it as it is for now and wait for hopefully more specfic details and reports of future encounters. Over the years we might get an average which may allow us to come to a certain conclusion.
Fair enough scorpion.
Sometime we wonder who they believe they are talking to…
Man do they think France is a country like Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe??
Here it was the weekly press conference of the Ministry of Defense. The shedulle of the day:
– the ATLC in UAE
– Cyprius
As reported to the .gouv.fr site!
A lieutenent Colonel, who is not a politician and who is used with rough talk says: they (the EF) took a “tole”. Something un-translatable you can understand easily if you imagine a rugby team which put 42 / 14 to another one…
First I thought it was off the reccord but it not even the case.
It’s confirmed by the 1/7 site where a very respected captain say how much he’s proud:
I can not remain silent any longer my pleasure drivers who are out there demonstrating the capabilities of the French flagship aircraft, are really raising high the colors of France, winning magnificent victories against other nations.
Then other highlight:
“What is reported is a bomb in the world of military aviation. Finally, we know what is really the Typhoon, and Rafale Raptor … “
Sh!t now!!!
So they can be 4 nations and France one, they can use as much distorted arguments as they want, they can try to win it on the bias and bad fairth ground – and succeed – they can take all this and put it where they want:
7 to 1 IS significant.
Oh, and the only bias concerning the ROE is that the Rafale used degraded Mica (4 to 0) then even more degraded Mica (3 to 1)
Cougar133: 🙂
And maybe it’s something completely different. Leaving out the one or other detail isn’t unusual.
… or is it simply that the Rafale is superior.
That’s a hypothesis we can’t rule out.
Accoding to a arturo link and according to Bruno Falcoz – Dassault general manager then – when Dassault left the EF project the others participants were going blind in the dark with the Delta/canard/FBW configuration. They had to try to re-invent everything without any feed-back, while being a “commity” with several point of view to compromise.
Dassault had much more experience and has always been very carefull to never break up its teams.
We’re still “dominated” by all the propaganda made previously by the EF side on the world media/public opinion/whatever but it’s perfectly possible.
@cseven, my try :
LANDIVISIAU
Traductions OTAN – Français
Front = <—
Back = —>
Blue = Gentils
Red = Méchands
F-TWENYTOO = RTB
Crazy french pilot = vous volez trop bas
Or it’s the user manual of the plane:
– click on the threat icon on the MHD using the mouse,
– drag it with the mouse to the trash box and release the button of the mouse,
– click the right button of the mouse and select the following option:
* ‘replay’ to shoot a second missile to the same target,
* ‘next’ to shoot automatically another target,
* ‘friendly fire’,
* ‘fry’ to fry the foe’s spermatozoons using the AESA radar
* ‘UFO’ to open the contextual menu for targets from outside the solar system.

It’s funny: on EVERY Rafale’s cockpit picture we see this little paper scotch-taped right side.
Now the question is: what is it written on it?!
The shopping list the pilot’s wife gave to him? 🙂