And usually drink some Champagne (french, real one!)
It helps to find compromises 🙂
With the sweet vapor of Champagne, under the golds of beautifull building (be it in France or in India, no problem, we both have plenty of that), with beautiful women who participate – women who are not only the most beautifull and elegant but also: inteligent (a french exclusivity?): we always find compromises 🙂
Oh please! This isn’t about selectively interpreting the contract its about rewriting the whole damn thing. Assembly at HAL is a basic tenet of the RFP issued by MoD. Reliance is a firm that has zero involvement in the aviation sector and were they to replace HAL, for all practical purposes it would be little different from shipping in CBUs from France.
Had Dassault requested that the risk be monetized and HAL/MoD share a fair load or for a greater albeit supervisory role at HAL, it would have been a different thing. But this attempt to replace HAL with Reliance is absurd bordering on the outrageous.
No such thing in the article. Read it again.
It’s either way Dassault has the choice of how to transfert the manufacturing process and it is then acountable; or it is HAL which is in charge and then fine: they are responsible and Dassault is not acountable for delays or cost overun.
It’s specified in the RFP that the deal will be of fixed price AND that HAL will be the main contractor, both point are subject to interpretation and nothing about Dassault’s responsability for HAL outcome at the RFP stage.
But we’re talking for nothing, we don’t know anything and it’s normal that in such a negociation there are moments when both side disagree and somehow show their muscles, the main point it to finally sit around a table and find compromises.
The point has been stated before but its merits a repeat – the model of production, assembly and delivery was spelled out in the RFP issued by the Indian MoD.
If Dassault had a problem with the RFP it shouldn’t have bothered bidding for the contract. But having bid for it and won, it is demonstrating bad faith by attempting renegotiate the terms of the agreement, whatever its motivations may be.
I hope the MoD doesn’t knuckle under and enters a back-channel dialogue with Eurofighter as a fall back in the event that Rafale deal is scrubbed.
Oooh you’re right!
You got autority, a natural autority i might say, you’re perfectly right: rules are made to be enforced and if everybody was doing as he wanted it’d be the mess. Fortunately there are people like you who have a global vision and who make rules which seems absurd for normal people but we can understand only later how wise they were.
(Sometime it’s better to have the know-how to speak like this to burocrats in half comunist countries** than the know-how to design and build the best current operational fighter/bomber in the world)
**no offence at all meant to our Indian friends, we are ourselve in a half comunist country so that’s something else we have in common…
that’s a 15-20 billions $ deal
you’d better take your time to read and discuss the small lines at the bottom of the contract.
On another hand once the indians have one hand in the gear with the first 18 pieces, and with investments in machine tools or other purchases already made, we can suppose that they will always find a pragmatic solution if a problem occurs.
We saw it with the sukhoi’s where the first batches were more “russians” than planed whatever the initial contract.
I hope that Dassault keep their lawyers in leash because otherwise it’s not finished this story…
Indians should trust Dassault on industrial efficientcy because Dassault is one of the best managed company of the world on that matter. Not less.
They should not only trust Dassault, but they should, in fact, open their eyes and hears wide to learn as much as they can here: manufacturing process should be considered as a part of the TOT package.
It has more to do with:
-1 industrial reasons,
-2 legal reasons.
it’s not a problem of TOT here.
Industrial reasons because Dassault and indian teams discuss in details how the stuff will be built at this stage. And Dassault focus on efficientcy to not loose money first, and second to deliver in time the right products.
Some indians are more politically driven unfortunately and they not only focus on industrial efficientcy but have to manage interests with HAL, the politicians and all.
I’m shared on this one. On one hand I would say that the Indians should trust Dassault for all the industrial work as long as Dassault stick with its contractual comitment concerning TOT and industrial share. That’s not the job of the politicians to design the manufacturing chain.
Some strenth relashionship at this stage can help to find a solution in the between and it’s better now than later to make the contrat start on the good track (concerning industrial efficientcy, that’s it).
On another hand I’d tell Dassault “take this ******* contract and we’ll see after!!”
New jumping to take Tessalit airport (after the dropping to take Timbuctu airport).
The paratroopers were quickly supported by the 1st RCP with assault landing on the airport… well… the track. A nice picture from a Harfanng drone

Of topic but not so much:
Meanwhile, the 1st Armoured RIMA, made a raid of more than 500 kilometers from Gao to join on the morning the elements in the French zone of Tessalit.
500 km in one night. Not bad!
From their side, the elements of the Chadian armed forces left Kidal in the day of 7 February to join.
It’s not totally of topic because this operation was performed with the support of helicopters and the Air Force who made in one night over thirty missions including a dozen strikes missions.
As we know the terrorists are retreating north.
here is Tessalit:
North pole soon?

Here it must probably taking off with the 2 GBUs and the gun cover out.
Of course it’s not 100% sure though it’s much easier to take a picture like this during the take off than during the landing.
And of course it doesn’t say either that the Rafale makes gun straffing in Mali.
Edit: The Rafale still has the “Artic Tiger” on one of its tank 🙂
Very nice picture, thanks. But wouldn’t there be some black smoke near the gun if they had used it?
It depends if they are about to take off or if they’ve just landed 😉
I bet on the first one.

Picture taken in N’djamena, Chad.
Canon cover out (and only 2 GBU’s)
I wonder if they made some straffing like the F1 used to make in Africa. Would be interesting to know and with which results.
Let’s note that A to G modes for the canon has been fully opened not that long ago.
funnily if our Transall’s are exhausted while German ones are not it because ours spent their time making freight and dropping between France and Chad … for Toyota wars 🙂
They are not made for this, and when the French were fed up to make grocery delivery day and night with everybody on the deck during Epervier, they called for a C5 Galaxy (already) and we saw the difference… (it’s really huge when you see it…)
This one had a mechanical issue on the Dakar airport though… but thanks 🙂
I wonder if David Cameron will get another cold shoulder anytime soon form a French leader after this helping hand?
I did not know the UK Govt. was considering increasing its C-17 fleet – an eminently sensible proposal.
The need to use RAF C-17s doesn’t say much for the FAF strategic lift capability.
Oh well, a friend in need is a friend indeed.
Actually France takes most of the load and risks for this international UN backed anti-terrorist operation.
British help with two C17s is wellcome and everybody is thankfull of course.
On another hand nothing comparable with French involment but we understand that UK forces has been heavily used in operations last decade (especially in Irak) and it now endures tough budget cuts. And thus: can’t do much more.
So we take the load, it’s normal.
…a friend in need is a friend indeed.
Why on earth would we want to do that?
When there is no obvious argument against collaboration/french military involvement/use of western force- we often end up in this bizarre anti France conspiracy territory (which seems to be skirting dangerously close to other “Who controls the Banks/Media” conspiracies I can think of).
Dangerously close…..
I agree and I regret this trend. Just for the reccord.
The question for me with this system is more whether the UK/France take the same approach as the USN and get a system into service earlier which can be modernised significantly or whether they wait for big advances in technology that will allow it to change the game.
Wait what?
UCAVs piloted from the rear seat as the stealth bomb bay of our (so called) 4th gen aircrafts make already 5th gen aircraft obsoletes and it is thus: a game changer. Nothing to wait, just go ahead with as much resolution as our politicians can provide :rolleyes:
You risk overinflation IF & only if the country is run by incompetents or criminals. As it is our debt is going over the top because of the very system. There isn’t even a question of good or bad management. The very monetary system creates unlimited debt.
Obviously it won’t be the UK or the US, although their debt situation is even worse than France’s. Hopefully for the UK, they’re not in the Euro 😉
BTW I’m tired of reading brits saying we shouldn’t pull out of the Euro. Join the bloody thing if it’s so beneficial.
Yeah. And the french industry managed to create a plane (Rafale) that’s just as good as the Typhoon (better) while remaining cheaper. What does it tell you about partnering with other nations as opposed to doing it alone?
I hope the real crisis & collapse comes soon before this BS is gone too far.
Nic
@nic
That’s one way to see things (all is the fault of others…) Although at this stage as we are I agree with you: monetary creation, a bit of inflation, the exit of Eurozone, a under-evaluated crappy currency for us and some kind of protectionism seems one way to recover margins of action for France now.
But no mistake: the Euro and all are not the reason of the problems.
There are no conspiracy anywhere.
The reason is our own side and we’ll just have to appologize to our partners when we’ll leave this mess (voluntary or not, the sooner the better)
1974: 2.5 M civil servant (as everybody know: France was like Zimbabwee back then, people weren’t going to school to learn writting French correctly, there were no cops and no security in the streets, there were no nurses nor doctors and we all born in caves…)
1982: 4 M civil servant
2011: 5 Millions.
When it was the hell in France without so many bureaucrats and social assistants: creation of a top nuclear industry both civilian and military, 85% of our electricity became nuclear and independant, creation of a top aviation industry both civilian and military, Concorde, Airbus, Mirages, missiles, helicopteres, fast trains, Ariane rocket, etc…
We have the possibility to do everything independantly, easy… just fire one civil servant on two…
Then you can even create money if you want to as well, because you also creat stuffs to put on front of it and you’re efficient. Otherwise it’s hyper-inflation and nothing more.
But since we’re not going to do it: the more I see the Germans, the more I like the British 😀
let’s go with the British cooperation, Sarkozy-Cameron plan was a not too bad plan.
Interesting summary Jacko.
There could also be radar improvements – perhaps with extra conformal arrays for the AESA to increase the coverage in azimuth.
This one is included in the INCA PEA.
The foundry for new power GaN MMIC has started at UMS Villebon-sur-Yvette BTW.
Since december 2011. We expect some news in 2012 (in case they don’t cut all investments to fund social assistants…)
Also, in case it’s not a typing error – it’s GaAs (or AsGa in French) and not GaaS modules.