So the Eurofighter has no throttle control? Going slower does not sound like that challenging a task. That must be one of the weirdest arguments to put a positive spin on a less powerful engine at about equal SFC.
And a B747 is more powerfull than a Typhoon. So it’ll beat it in dogfight uh?
Re-read you post before clicking on ‘Submit Reply’ button dude.
The Rafale engines may be 20% less powerfull but the plane is also 20% lighter.
(… and carries 20% more btw)
And since both SFC are equivalent, the Rafale consume 20% less.
Is it ok or do you need a drawing to understand?
Edit: for info, the latest version of General Electric CF-6 engine – the engine of the B747 – has a specific fuel consumption of 0.32 đ
…. without AB đ
… and since we talk about Specific Consumption,
the fact the M88 push 20% less than the EJ200 => it consume 20% less!
The specific consumption show the efficientcy of a engine. It’s g of fuel per N of thrust.
Arthuro: your article exist in English here
http://www.dassault-aviation.com/index.php?id=940&L=1
Rafale tames the tigers
An Air Force Rafale F2 took part in the 2006 Tiger Meet. On its first international outing, the French Air Forceâs new fighter made a strong impression on participants from other nations.
The Tiger Meet is an annual NATO exercise that brings together squadrons having a tigerâs head in their squadron crest. The 2006 event, organized at Albacete Air Base in Spain, featured around 50 combat aircraft (and some helicopters) from 11 nations. Though the majority of aircraft at Albacete were F-16 MLUs, F/A-18s and Tornados, there were also 10 French fighters â 1/12 squadron âCambresisâ had come from Cambrai with six Mirage 2000 RDIs, while 05/330 squadron âCĂ´te dâargentâ attached to the Mont-de-Marsan CEAM flight test centre had made the trip with two Mirage 2000-5s and two twin-seat Rafale F2s.
INTER-ALLIED CONTEXT
âThe Tiger Meet developed substantially during the 1990s,â explains Colonel Mercier, who heads the planning section at the French Air Force general staff (1). âNowadays, the exercise, which lasts for one week, is a top-level operation, aimed exclusively at pilots with mission leader qualification.â
The presence of the Rafale at Albacete, first envisaged in early 2006 and firmly backed by the French Air Force staff, was undoubtedly the highlight of this yearâs event. âWe came for two reasons,â explains 05/330 commanding officer lieutenant-colonel Pagès. âFirst, we wanted to verify the operational added value that the Rafale represents in a complex inter-allied context. The CEAM test centre and 05/330 squadron have been testing the aircraft over the past few months, and it was a logical step to look at the multinational aspect, with all the interoperability issues which that implies. The other reason for the deployment was to validate the network maintenance concept beyond French borders.âTo cut a long story short, the Rafale did all that was asked of it. The 05/330 teams returned from Spain with the firm conviction that they had an aircraft perfectly ready for external deployment.
POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION
The aircraft took part in two missions every day. The morning mission was a fairly classic air defense exercise, while the afternoon flight involved around 30 aircraft in a Composite Air Operation (Comao) â an attack against land-based or naval targets.
In a clear demonstration of the Rafaleâs multi-role capabilities, both aircraft and their crews switched easily from the attack role (simulating the use of AASM missiles) to the air defense role (with Mica missiles).
âBeyond this multi-role capability, the first thing we learned was the remarkable quality of the weapon system,â Lt. Col. Pagès underlines. âWe were able to confirm that the high degree of sensor fusion gave us a clear advantage in our awareness of the tactical situation. Rafale crews were able to positively identify targets at a much greater distance than other aircraft. It is well known that in more and more cases the rules of engagement require that the target be identified before attacking, which may lead a fighter to fly within three or four nautical miles of the target. With the Rafale, this distance is multiplied by three, four or even more in some cases, which considerably boosts safety and the chances of success.â
The forward sector optronics (FSO) system was particularly popular with the aircrews, who were impressed by its performance: âBy cueing the FSO with the tracks provided by his radar or by another aircraft via Link 16, a pilot can easily identify an aggressor force at a range of several tens of nautical miles. For example, he can pick up two Tornados and an F/A-18 preparing to penetrate at 20,000ft and the three other F/A-18s, easy to identify with their twin tails, protecting them at 40,000ft.âDISCRETION AND EFFECTIVENESS
In general, the Rafaleâs sensor suite generates excellent awareness of the tactical situation around the aircraft. âAt the debriefing, we were able to say exactly who was doing what and where,â comments Lt. Col. Pagès. âThe other crews were very surprised at our global situational awareness (2).â
This brings us to Link 16, a key part of the âRafale revolutionâ which also perfectly fulfilled its role during the Tiger Meet. It is known that thanks to this data link, Rafale aircraft can exchange information without uttering a single word on the radio. French crews note that this silent communication was also used throughout the exercise with NATO Awacs aircraft. âThe Awacs could only communicate with us via Link 16 and the operators were very happy to see us,â says a pilot. âFollowing a very complex mission, one Belgian pilot told us that we didnât talk much on the radio but that we seemed to have good control of the tactical situation. That was not untrue âŚâA quick word about Spectra to close this very brief overview.
The âCĂ´te dâArgentâ Rafales are equipped with the final version of the electronic warfare suite. Not wishing to unveil its full capabilities, the crews did not use the system to its maximum potential, particularly in the offensive role. They made full use of the passive mode, however, for threat detection using Spectraâs interferometric capability. The support teams were able to expand their threat libraries during the Tiger Meet, while increasing their familiarity with this very special system. On the second day of the exercise, the Comao included an attack on an air defense site. By combining the interferometric capabilities of Spectra, the power of the FSO and the Link 16 data link, the Rafales were able to detect, identify and destroy the site from long range by âvirtuallyâ firing AASM missiles (3).A CLASS ABOVE
Which takes us directly to this conclusion drawn from the exercise by Colonel Mercier of the planning section: âThe Tiger Meet confirmed that the range of Rafaleâs identification systems is fully coherent with the range of its Mica and AASM weapons. Thanks to its modular weapons and the potential offered by data fusion, the aircraft will be able to attack naval or land-based targets from a safe distance, with positive identification. There is almost nothing that we cannot do with this aircraftâŚâ
The conclusion of the conclusion: with a lead of several years over the US JSF (or F-35), the Rafale is clearly in the same class. It is a level above the Eurofighter which, it should be added, also shone at the exercise. But only by its absence⌠đHenri HĂŠmon (freelance journalist)
(1) As a former commanding officer of 1/12 squadron âCambresisâ, Colonel Mercier remains a member of the âtiger communityâ.
(2) It is still too early to unveil all the details, and the French pilots did not wish to reveal the full capacities of their aircraftâŚ
(3) The AASM missile is not yet in service with the French Air Force, but the fire control systems of the Rafale F2 can simulate its use in ground attack and even anti-ship scenarios. The AASM is an extremely innovative weapon whose capabilities astonished foreign participants in the Tiger Meet (cf. box on AASM).
Note that in UMS technological roadmap, the GH25 series of GaN devices, with 0.25micron technology working in X band (the band used in most air intercept radars including RBE2) will not be in production by 2010 when the ‘RBE2 actif’ is supposed to enter service on Rafale.
So I doubt the ‘RBE2 actif’ will use GaN, except if I mixed the dates or missed a point đŽ .
Unlike you I don’t really see a contradiction.
It’s said that the first fly of the RBE2-AA will take place by 2008 so with sample components. That suits the end of the ‘development’ phase of the roadmap.
It’ll be ready for production in 2012 so after the ‘process qualification’ phase.
If you go even further, the 50micron GaN is limit X-band/ S-band. In other word it’s very low X-band, better to detect stealth normaly…
And also close to the weather radars ….
… and the DGA have made tests just a couple of weeks ago to detect (stealth) planes with the athmospheric disturbance đ
Source A&C. Just free speculations of course :rolleyes:
There are several indications that next RBE2 AESA will be GaN. No 100% evidence like a official statment but several indications.
One of the best one is this roadmap from the DGA:

Not a proof but why this little article about GaN in the same page as the description of the future AESA antena?
Also there is clearly a program dedicated to GaN componants for radar called KORRIGAN. For several years now. Funded and all.
Also a little sentence in Fox3 mag’ saying that next antena will use “next generation components” (thought it could be tooting of AsGa)
And to finish Soitec company who is a world leader (if not the world leader) for substrate made a breakthrough called “Smart-Cut” awhile ago concerning GaN on silicon substrate (or something like that)
http://www.soitec.com/en/news/pr109.htm
There is also something in some Thales publications about the use of those components.
Edit: quote from Thales
Nitrides : The expected breakthrough in power genereration
Confirmation of the expected performance of nitride matĂŠrials. Compared with Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), nitrides are 10x more robust against electromagnetic aggression, have the same noise level and a microwave power density 10 x higher (8,5 W per mm2 of grid). TRT has demonstrated operation up to 18 GHz with material quality & performnce comparable with the state of the art.
So that I agree with Rob: they’d like to start with GaN from the beginning but they have AMSAR AsGa MMIC as a backup.
The idea is to start from the beginning with the right technology and make the Americans look like those guys who bought a shinny $15,000 plasma screen 5 years ago while you can find a much better LCD one now for $1500 đ
On average, in Afghanistan, it’s tended to be a one sortie/one bomb war.
On average …
But if one day you need 6 and you have only 2, you’re in the sh!t!
Last time it was F1CR recco planes who had to come to make gun passes to help the guys on the ground; while the 2 M2000D had already dropped their 2 bombs each…
Edit: oh, and the 2000D don’t carries the Damocles pod but the PDLCT pod.
Surprisingly (for you đ ), there is not only PR businesses in life.
A Rafale with its 6 GBUs worth 3 M2000D.
And a much better range so less air refuelling for each missions.
Also, the 2000 or the SEM with its pod will carry only this – the pod – so it’ll be able to carry more fuel tanks so that it’ll be all right to patrol with the Rafales.
That makes sens militarily speaking.
but you need your “bull$hit filter” to be as finely tuned to detect the rubbish
Yep.
Tell you what Jacko:
I believe Jackomino is what we call in France a âjounaliste de connivenceâ
He says what the one who makes advertising in his little shop want him to say
… to make his monthly wage.
Why? None of us is going to buy any Typhoon right?
Because some facts must be stated and well stated in the public opinion. A general belief must be built. Something repeated 1000 time canât be totally wrong isnât it? It must be even true.
It starts in the Internet. Then specialized magazine canât **** off those who make them live through advertising so theyâd filter things in a way or another. Like it or not but itâs the way it goes.
A non specialised reporter will pick up his info where he can, google, specialized magâ, on so on.
âSeriousâ studies like JOUST can bring great material.
A general opinion is built and finally, when the bill goes to the deputies theyâd swallow it whatever the delay or the overcost or the relevance of the choices made. And surprisingly they are not even lynched when they go out of the house since itâs the best plane bar the F22 right?
Letâs not forget that a potential customer will have to make swallow a hell of a bill to his public opinion too and this one should better believe that itâs the purchase of the very top (bar the F22…. always âbar the F22â: that gives credibility…). It helps.
So I donât belive one word of what youâre saying jacko, no offense. Thatâs all propaganda, rumors, covered words, etc… Thereâs a nice bunch of PR and âjournalist de conivenceâ working for BAE, they are very good for that (better than designing planes)
Dassault in another hand are stingy to make advertizing except if there is a deal on the way somewhere, they are arrogant, pure ingeneers, have contempt for paper pushers and tend to believe that their planes must be deserved by their customers (that a critic in case you didnât get it)
I donât belive also that the EF is more agile, not even that itâs more powerfull and all in all I donât think the EF is better in anything important, even in pure AA role.
– Concerning the radar, you miss the LPI point. The captor is the same generation as the RDY2. No surprise here since none of EF members was in the M2000-5 / F16 blk 52 generation. (though the RBE2 will be much better with its active antena for range reasons actually)
– The M88 is as efficient as the EJ200 as shown by the Specific Consuption of both engines, as shown by the reccord entry temperature and as shown by the techâ used. So that the Rafale has finally a better T/W when both plane are filled for the same range. Et oui. The EF is heavier than planed…
– DASS is no comparison with SPECTRA (again, you people missed one generation while Dassault was there against the F16 blk52).
– Nobody will make us swallow that Tornado team has a better expertise than Dassault concerning delta-cannard-instable-FBW aircraft
To sum it: the Eurofighter is a super-F16 or even more relevantly: a Mirage 4000-5 (mk2 is you want) which is good enough. Next one only will be on par.
And to finish, I know someone who have worked 20 days at Dassault St Cloud (to work on some software) and everybody here is perfectly confident concerning the technical superiority of their baby, off the record, sincerely and with plenty of good reasons. Dassault staff at the highest level have showed several times a benin contempt for this plane and all the propaganda made to couterbalance its weaknesses.
No offence intended.
I got this one

I also think it’s a bit interesting that these events don’t seem to have gained more international attention.
Because when the anglo-american fight for “freedom and democracy” they like a big press coverage while when the French fight for “neo-colonialism” :rolleyes: they shut their mouth. Not new that.
Only 6 Mirage F.1 as the combat element, & a solitary C-135 tanker.
That’s the most modern planes of our force so we are allready over-stretched and can’t do more :rolleyes:
But if the French can operate out of N’Djamena, so can other air forces.
Sure! And we’re gona lend them our base with all the infrastructure as well as our Dakar base needed for the backup.
This way, the 2 idots can play the CNN warriors, and at the end of the movie the good british pilot take the poor orphan girl in his arm and we cry :rolleyes:
(well … in reality: at the end they evacuate their ambassy in emergency… :diablo: )
It seems that for now the Sudanese and its allies are already on the defensive.
http://www.examiner.com/a-428584~Jets_Bomb_Central_African_Republic_Town.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6059712.stm

Mr Pronk said the army’s defeats in its latest six-week campaign in Darfur came at Umm Sidir and Karakaya.
Some soldiers were now refusing to fight, he said.
…
He also said that Chad, Sudan’s neighbour to the west, is also taking an increasing role in the fighting.
I’m not so sure because there are very fiew informations but I hope I’m right for Darfur.
Sudan has already sufered heavy defeats in Darfur thanks to the help of Chad
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6059712.stm
Be careful of the manipulation of the media…
Also the Chadian rebels helped by Sudan have been massacred in April near D’jamena and the – also assisted by Sudan – CAR rebels have been massacred as well a week ago in North CAR.
Any word on what the French government thinks about a multilateral plan?
The French don’t talk about those African issues đ
I’d like here to show the job of someone called Cyclone**
http://www.checksix-forums.com/showthread.php?t=95873&page=19
Left side

Right side

One can understand better why the DVI is less usefull…
**note: if someone think it’s not correct to show the job of someone else, just say and I’ll remove those picture.
Note2: there’s other great 3D pictures in the thread
Australia had a heap of these wonderful planes and after service were sold to Pakistan for a symbolic $1
Boy what would I give to be able to bring one back home!
Maybe you can propose ‘hem $2?. Like this they make a 100% profit and everybody’s happy đ
I’ve got a question for Ja Worthley (and others of course). It’s a bit OT, sorry.
in this very interresting thread a former Aussi MIII pilot (maybe it’s you) says this:
The R550 is/was a better close in Missile than the AIM9L. The R550 autoscan lock ability was awesome in comparison the AIM9L mechanisation in the Sea Harrier at the time of the conflict.
The ‘conflict’ being Falkland war.
BTW, the guy added this interesting scan

In another hand, in this interesting thread a guy who is maybe a former HAF pilot say this:
When I served, HAF M2Ks bore the Magic II. The latter was indeed superior to the AIM-9L/M that HAF F-16s were packing – but only marginally, not drastically.
The Magic II had a more sensitive IR sensor which resulted in a somewhat quicker lock buzz signal than respectively the AIM-9L. Also, the sensor head had a greater angle of movement (+/- 10 degrees if I’m not mistaken) which resulted in a slightly greater forward lock cone. That, coupled with the MagicIIs great aerodynamic performance made it possible to score a Fox2 at slightly greater angles and shorter moments than with the AIM-9 series.
But like I said all the above constitute marginal differences. I find it hard to believe that the predecessor of the Magic II was already better than the Lima (it would mean no real improvement from Magic I to Magic II). Especially since I never saw it referred to as an “all aspect” IR missile anywhere, contrary to the AIM-9L.
Who’s right? đ
Thanks Papa Lima.
He was deported as a resistant and as a (great) Gaullist, not as a jews since Vichy was evil but did not deport french jews just for their religion.
To stick back to the subject, here are the 4 Rafales over Paris:


(Thanks C6 for the pictures)