The most clever solution at every level: operationnal, financial, industrial, cost, interoperability, possibility to make a common task force to remake a Suez (:D), etc, etc, would be:
-1/ France buy on the shelve her PA2 to the UK
-2/ the UK buy about 60 Rafales for her carrier(s)
-3) and possibly: we make a common offer to Brazil or whoever and we take this opportunity to design the packaging.
I just can’t understand it’s not obvious to everybody. If weapons as well as defense budget were only for defense with efficientcy in mind it would for sure. Unfortuntelly some prefer to waste time, budgets, opportunities and all logic because of little political rivalry, jealousy, well: petite sentiment.
Our budgets are still too comfortable and the international situation still too peacefull and quiet probably…
The wake up will be harsh… and too late I fear.
French public debt is 86% of GDP.
British public debt is 64% of GDP.French debt is higher in absolute terms, as well as relative to the economy. It’s about £1.4 trillion. :p
Your figure are seriously outdated dear…
We are more like 81/87% end 2011 for the public debt.
But the main point is not here.
The main point is that with a about 17% saving rate, French citizen are among the biggest savers of the world. So a big share of the debt is owned by the French and the money stay in the family (there are even some money left to fund other’s debt and actually the French own a huge lot of Italian debt… if they fall=> we fall…)
In UK case, everybody is endebted: the corporates, the state, the financial sector and the individuals.
So that the total external debt is something like 500% of GDP. Awful. One of the worst rate of the world.
Again British and French cases are absolutally not comparable.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_deb_ext-economy-debt-external
Procurement budget is 11.5b Euro and R&D 1.85b Euro. it is about the same size as India.
11 Rafale is pretty low number. Only 10% of procurement budget at most. They will be better if they buy Rafale at 30 a year to decrease the price and retire older jets. This will also decrease the prices for export.
Well, there are other material to order and if they could order less Rafale for now, they would. At the moment helicoteres, the fleet, drones, antibalistic missiles, recco statellites, munissions, tankers and strategical lift are a priority and rightly so.
With now 100 Rafales in line as well as the M2000-5 and the 2000D, more Rafales are wellcome but not as urgent as the rest.
The tankers and the A400M will be in the 2013 budget I guess.
For now it is:
– “Dassaulted” Heron TP UAVs
– 42 NH90 (8 recieved and 34 more ordered), 6 Tiger helicopteres,
– 2nd batch of M51 nuke missile,
– 3rd Mistral class
– 1 FREMM
– optical and IR sattelites,
– 2 SAMP-T AA and anti-balistic missile set
– 228 AASM, 61 Aster-15/30, 16 Exocet MM40, FTL (Future heavy torpedo),
– MDCN (Scalp Naval)
– 100 VBCI
– ….
– 11 Rafale
– etc…
Plus other programs on the way that still need funds: Meteor missile, Barraccuda SSN, TNO (new nuclear war head), ESSAIM ELINT statellites, R&D, etc…
For a 2012 procurement budget of 11.76b€ instead of 11.85b€ planed before the “trim” (not really a bloodbath for a “cut”)
That was a nice story bro’…
… however, it’s a non story.
Have you read the complicate numbers?
A cut of €267 million over a €31.72 billion budget.
At this level, you call it “adjustment” or “trim” as you put it well in the tittle. Nothing comparable with the british case, really.
The 3 lines wall problem… but here few excuses because it’s 2nd line of the article 😉
No but Captor-E is a Captor-M with a new AESA front end. The ease of putting such an array onto the existing back end was conclusively demonstrated in the CAESAR programme. The planned array, with repositioner, is already flying as part of Bright Adder, and (in effect) on Gripen NG as well.
This is pretty low risk stuff.
You mean like the integration of the Taurus is “clearly demonstrated”, and “very low risk stuff”?
It’s even more “finished” here, ready to take off, everything is clear… since 2003!
The AESA Captor not flying now is another shame and pretending it’ll be ready by the Indian time frame is clearly a fraud. No more, nor less.
‘Fraud’ is the optimistic case. Because on another hand: to believe truely that something is archieved once you’ve talked about it has a name: mythomania. And it’s a pathology.
The first Rafale AESA (DRAA) flown in 2003 first and since then they work on the ‘stuff’ and the first operational one is delivered this year.
Because of this but also many other indications, I believe the whole Eurofighter program is a risk in fact.
A badly born plane which drove to discouragement among its fathers who now want to get rid of it and sell them as new/used kits. Most of them – those who pretend to have a air force – have already switched to the F35. The page is turned except for the show for the Indians, as long as they are there anyway, after….
Only Cassidan try desesperately to get some pocket money back selling it using spin, sometime corruption and now the profit made with Airbus to dump TOT and deals.
And he’s either disingenuous or misinformed when he says:
Quote:
“The British Court of Auditors, the NAO, denounced the years drift of 75% of the European EF-2000.”
The NAO were forced into an embarrassing climb down when it became clear that the 2010 figures were wrong. Typhoon has experienced cost growth, but not by that much, and it has been reported as being the cheaper aircraft in Switzerland and the UAE, and within 5% in India – and that could mean 5% cheaper, or 5% more.
Last time I checked (that’s some time ago I admit) the total program cost for the 294 (then) Rafales was about even with the cost of the German’s 180 EFs; and the cost for the British 234 (then) was superior.
Once for all, what is the total program cost for the German’s 180 (? now) and the British 234 (? now)
Is it possible to have these numbers including everything like for Rafale program cost (upgrades, tranches improvement costs, simulatiors, R&D, etc, etc) or is it too smoggy?
Numbers from independant committees (like NAO or Court des Comptes) are wellcome.
Jackonicko link is interesting anyway. There is a video about French helo’ operations I didn’t knew
http://www.necn.com/searchNECN/search/v/40970439/helicopters-key-in-keeping-pressure-on-khadafy.htm
Exactly, and French pilots have expressed their will to have a coordinates extraction function developed for this pod.
Very true. That’s a interesting Retex of the Libyan campaign: Rafale patrols with one Rafales equiped with Aeros for real time treatment of the infos.
The magic of fast food journalism…. 😡
AFP did a terrible job reporting the interview of Longuet. They interpreted what the Defense Minister said so as to get a sensational headline and this misleading headline was copied/pasted by every one, even in some specialized international media (which is a shame)
bogus Interpretation of AFP : Longuet Says Rafale Production Will Stop If No Export Orders
What the Minister actually said during the interview: “If I remember correctly, the Rafale production will run until 2018 at least on French need only”
Ministry note the next day to clarify everything : “The Rafale production will run beyond 2020 on French need only”. Period.
AFP = Agence France Presse is actually a major international press agency side by side with Reuter. That’s quite an archievement for a French news agency. Congrat’
… but to archieve so they feel compusory to be more “english” than the anglo-saxons themselve and they go their natural way they find very classy anyway: self-bashing!
… but it fits perfectly well with normal anglo-saxon way thus: their international success!
Everything is easy to understand 😉
Nothing new with the French way of doing journalism: “Radio Paris ment, radio Paris est Allemand”

I love the disgusted militaty who got his toy, yes, but the cheapest and “do it yourself” 😮
J-20, I’ve been a little bit ironical with the navy picture but I agree: the Typhoon can look pretty good under certain profiles and I’m not as severe as some 😉
I do like the Typhoon a lot sleek and from the profile (the single seat vesion though)
The Rafale it’s the contrary IMO. It doesn’t look very good sleek and profile but armed and 3/4 front: yeah!
Your last picture is great indeed.
It’s not because it hasn’t happened yet that you can conclude something went wrong.
No. But since they communicated a lot with that we have the right to ask “so where are those cruise missiles now?”
If it’s shown but not out since 2003, we also have the right to suspect something not clear.
It’s perfectly legitimate to do that in that case, because of the advertisement made (I remember a front page of a magasine with a EF fitted with 2 Storm Shadows)
If they were still advertising the Gerfaut helmet for the Rafale, we would expect that everybody question the feasability of the project.
My favorite. Beeaaautifullll!!! 🙂
The other problem is that we see pictures of the EF with Storm Shadow and Taurus since 2003. We also had advertising in newspapers for awhile, and a nice Science Fiction video of EF making cruise missile missions and then escaping away from ground missiles thanks to its rocket power…
Since then it still hasn’t flown. I wonder what went wrong.
I suspect a range issue but I wonder also if there is not a FBW control issue (the fight control laws aren’t the same before and after the weapon is released and it’s not a benin problem as some want us to believe)
The problem is that everything is always simple on brochures with the EF but we never see anything.
Like for the AESA. It’s considered as a done task because many brochures has been printed but it remain to be funded and programed in a actual tranche.
More good news for EF’s bid:
Seconding Quad:
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/wire-news/india-to-wrapmmrca-dealfour-weeks-iaf-chief_620205.html
And where is the Thyphoon flying with a Taurus???
Or any cruise missile while we are at it?
I saw the picture previous page. The Typhoon with two Taurus on the runway ready to take off. Problem is that it’s still on the runway and never took off…. since 2003!
You’re like the Eurofighter comunication department: a troll.