** REMOVED BY WM **
Originally posted by PLA
I agree that jews are equal and have ewusl rights as all other humans. I agree that terrorizing Israel is bad. It is there and should stay there forever.But zionism is close to racism. T
Don’t you find it ironic that the only country in the middle east
were arabs can freely vote for who ever they want is in good
ol’ rasict israel? Can you imagine a senator or politicians any
were in the US or Europe that oppose the existance of the
country in which they are elected officials? imagine a pro
Al Qaeda govenor or congressman, does this make sense
to you? how ever in Racist facist colonialsit satan worshiping
or wathever the the “Jewish state” (that makes up less
then 1% of the middle east in land and population) is called today
has this palestian parliament member (ahmad tibi and azmi bishara). That preech hatered towards Israel while being
members of the Knesset
[]The Israeli peace plan is more like getting good land and giving dead land… Which fool would accept that… Not even Arafat. [/B]
Please explain what is a good land or a bad a dead land.
Bare in mind the best tomatos in the world are grown in the
desert with the Israeli invention of dreep irrigation.
Up until that comment i had a valid argument but now you
are a plan anti semite.
Like the song said if there is no water in the river it’s cause
the Jews drank it all and f the river is full they must have
****ed inside.
Originally posted by SOC
“Sanctions from the U.S. would be severe. Not a little smack like the Iraq strike.”I dunno about US backlash, we do seem to let Israel get away with whatever it wants, and never stand up to them in the UN with the rest of the world :rolleyes: Sure, we’d probably stand up and say “bad”, but I’d be willing to bet that we don’t stop F-16s heading over the ocean from Lockheed…
“Well, what does this tell us? Probably that there’s more valuable targets elsewhere…”
Or that they’re learning the system before they commit it to an active part of the defense of their country.
I’m curious to know what all the US military might would ahave
been reduced to if Israel would’nt attack to Osirak reactor in
1981.
“A nation that forgets its past is doomed to repeat it. “
-Winston Churchill
Originally posted by GarryB
“
It is quite amusing that it is OK for Israel to have nuclear weapons and Iran is not. Previous military action in the area seems to suggest the arabs have more to fear from the jews than the jews have from the arabs.
What previous military action in the area suggest that?
Is it the use of WMD on the Kurds by Iraq?
or is it the exchange of of chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq
war?, or may be it’s the use of WMD in the Lybia-Chad mini
war? or perhaps the Egyptian use if chemical against Yemen
in that conflict?
Is there military parades in Israel with sign calling to earase
Iran of the Map? or is it the other way around.
Since the starter of this thread wanted to remain technical
i will add thispossible route. A flight acroos the red sea
(possibly cutthing through Yemen and Oman and over the
persian gulf and a refuling of the arebian sea (possibly
assisstance from India). Also Israeli subs can launch their
missiles at unfinished bomb runs or at possible scud launching
sites before or after iranian retaliation.
Of course as we know control over the nuclear and balistic misslies is not in the hnds of the Iraian army but in the hands of
the fundamentalist revolutionary gourds. Hitting their HQ via
air or sea will further distrupte the response.