No the Indian Agni fins in the re-entry vehicle does manuver. Also the Indian Prithvi missile does not have a ballistic profile as its fins are designed for a loft trajectory, see below:
Doubtfull that the missile in its whole “reenters” the atmoshpere, also i think the vins on the Pakistani missiles are fixed, not steerable. The steering happens with the engines i belief, the vins of prithvi are also fixed and not steerable as you can see in this picture
This is the China news pics and speculation thread, so speculate…
1) Cockpit / Avionics – has it improved from this:
2) Radar – So is it the Grifo? Latest was to use an all Chinese avionics suite – what is that, what is the capabilities
3) Engine – There are reports that Russia will not allow re-export, as recently as last year. So what has changed, if not is there a version flying with a Chinese engine? What is the name of the engine?
You can flame if you feel better, or avoid the topic, but no one has answered the questions, and I am pretty sure that that you guys don’t know either. Yes I have read the old threads, and there is nothing concrete in there.
You ask what is in a MKI, LCA, Gripen, Eurofighter, Rafael, F35, F22 – everyone can put some concrete facts. The FC-1 which is much less ambitious is so hush ?!
Later…
That layout is outdated and wasnt even good “represented” at that time, since no possible avionics package was known. The jf-17 layout will more likely be in this order, like represented by the proposed sagem jf-17 avionics suit. And pls dont put the names of LCA and Fc-1/JF-17 in the same laegue as the F35, F22, Eurofighter etc, both are “medium tech” planes, not “high tech” 🙂 .
Sign In
_cockpit.jpg)
