dark light

AdmarilZhengHe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 112 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    indonesia need to stop pirating and creting smog before it need fancy toy.

    in reply to: F-84F Questions #2519253
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    It’s not directly from the P-47, but many of the design aspects of the aircraft were influenced because of the success of the P-47.

    The Thunderbolt is very durable and it has a very strong construction, just like the P-47.

    It had a bubble canopy (at least before the F-84G it did), just like the later models of the P-47.

    It was a fighter in designation, but in reality it shined in the mud moving role, just like the P-47.

    Basically, the P-47 & F-84 (as well as the later F-105) share in common the ability to haul large warloads to long distances as well as being very durable, reliable, and being excellent air-to-ground aircraft.

    i see what you mean. do US make jet fighter out of P-51?
    also on side question.. if France shoot down Israeli airplane, do you support US action on France? I ask you this because you are American.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2519265
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    How many times Russia keep asking China to join PAK-Fa?
    What is the China decision as of now?

    === NOTHING YET ===

    Russia may offer many sell promotions to China, but China may not necessarily purchase verythig that offered.

    China no longer need Russia help in combat fighter.. license Su-27 now can have own Chinese engine and even different cokpit that is more efficient and cleaner looking. for 5th generation, China can do it on her own now and will bet anyone they will reach it first before Russia. also MiG 1.44 or S-37 do not count as 5th generation. it is just half made test bed.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2519417
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    man, I know this world is complicated and all the things are interlinked. But that’s why we want to make things simpler: if we discuss china’s aviation, then let’s concentrate on mainly on this topic.

    我們要阻止菲律賓和馬來西亞奪走我們的外島

    ok i try limit it to more aviation for you 🙂
    so do PLAN need Tu-22M3 to project ability to defend Nansha?

    in reply to: New French-Israeli incident in Lebanon #2519427
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    truth comes from the mouth of childrens…

    I am happy you agree with me. after you post, look like some people here also say same thing that American will support military action on French if French attack Israel planes.

    French don’t like Israel. American don’t like french. French like to opposite all that is USA, only for glory seeking. (Grandeur)
    Germans will never fire vs IDF. Italian, Spanish and the others want to stay far from troubles and are in Lebanon for glory seeking too. Noone looks to fight Hizballah nor IDF.

    I agree. The suggestion that the anti-Israel UN is there to protect the peace and not acting as a proxy for the terrorists, is hilarious, as is the suggestion that the French will shoot at IDF aircraft. Remember, the only reason that the French force is as large as it is, is because they didn’t want the Italians in command.

    Sauron

    in reply to: Finnish (and other minor European) Navy news & discussion #2077895
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    Many have tryed…many have died :dev2: Dont mix our willingness to defend ourselves to nationalistic boast of conquering the great-finland back. Our people is fortuanate that advocates of reconquaring some acient lost terretories are minority with no political respect at all…that way of thinking just haven’t got any space in modern europe, we havent got afford for it, becouse (like I said million times) if we do it, what prevents swedes or Russians to do the same? The have as agreable claims to us than we have to them…but world doesent fortuanetly follow anylonger that sort of pipe-dream thinking
    …so please if your only purpose is to lure me some sort of bashing of china or chinese nationalisist, you can forget about it. 😎

    i donno why you tihnk i bash finland. it is opposite actually because I sympathize with Finland. Finland and China have alot of land stolen by Russia, so we have simalar history and can understand. what Russia take is not small piece but pretty big
    http://cc.joensuu.fi/~alma/ktl/maps/kar-defs.gif
    not all fighting is from number of weapons. gorilla fighting can overcome numbers. Mao had only peasant army but win. Finnland people, when determin, can hold off many times bigger an army even if with poor weapons. Is too bad spirit of Finland has disappear now and that the country only have alcoholic and suicide people 🙁 🙁

    in reply to: Finnish (and other minor European) Navy news & discussion #2078085
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    Yeas you didn’t understand me. We are small country with big ego, but little to conduct offensive warfare. Its totally different matter to defend our own fields than try to invade something that Isent us. The people is what counts, not the swamps and the woods. What would we do with 200,000 russians that are the sole inhabitants of those lands? Ethnical purification?? Those lands are lost…thats just the way it is…It was different back in 40’s but its too late to look back there. By that logic, you only need to take the rigth historical map and everyone can draw almoust everything on everywhere on europe if he wants to…..life goes on, borders changes…

    it is not hopeless. you just emigrate Finnish people back to Karelia and support independent movement. that is how China reclaim some land back that is stolen. right now even, many Chinese move back to Siberia, every Chinese know Siberia belong to them.

    your thinking is not healthy. it is no surprise everyone like to invade Finland then. 🙁 🙁

    in reply to: New French-Israeli incident in Lebanon #2519924
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    Are you for real? Is someone on this board playing a joke on the rest of us??? BTW You spelled your own name wrong. :rolleyes:

    Nothing will come of these incidents but I do wish the French would put the Israelis in thier place. Sounds like Israel need to be put back in its place, i.e it is not a world power!

    no it is real you see. most American hate French peoples. Even on this BBS you can see. I do a search and everytime French do something like talk against Iraq war, 100% of the time Americans hate France. I see American member like FantanII, Saururon, Sufnlaker, Distilled, etc not too happy with France so maybe they side with Israel easy. Even Bush side with Israel everytime. it is not bad really, good for weapon industry and bomb terrorist people.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2519927
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    And WT%%^& that has to do this thread? I know it’s hard to seperate politics from military, but at least we should try.

    maybe you do not realize, but military and wars come from politics. Country like China buy weapon because of politics stuff like Nansha island dispute with Vietnam and Phillipine.

    And yes Vietnam is serious threat because they control most of Nansha and have history of fighting China all the time, killing Chinese people and stealing land.

    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    I dont see any Chinese plane with western stuff or influenced by western design. starting from J-5 and ending at J-11. some are copy, some are license and some have Russian consultancy. this from technical cooperation point of view.

    no they cut off because Ukraine play with US like Georgia play with US, Russia will attack by gas. with neighbor like that make you worried yes.
    so you do not think Chinese plane is more western? so you think J-10 and FC-1 lookl ike MiG 29 and Su-27? SD-10 look like R77? maybe you eat too much children again.

    in reply to: Finnish (and other minor European) Navy news & discussion #2078137
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    we allready tryed the re-match in the 40’s ….and lost. So no way of picking blood out of our nose no more. And thecnically all Karelia, even the parts where my brother lives, Was first claimed (by internationally regogniced ruler) By the Novogorod dutchy and all that has been gained then are just Swedish anxestion.
    And the Karelian people are more of them own than finnish, and they have suffered there always, so no need to make fuzz about something that doesent really exists. There isent any finnish people living in the lost territory, and the small minority of Karelian people live in lands that has never belonged to Sweden or the independent Finland that pretty much legimates its exsistance from the old swedish rule and stuff…. (If you dont count the small period of 15th century when it was conqured by the Swedish super power, but even then it was treaded administrationally as other gained terretory such as Pommer in germany)

    Karelia has been source of downfall to our extrem-rigth (by advocating useless crusades in the 20’s and ultimately attacking there whit the nazis in ’41) and extreme-left (the refugees of the failed 1918 revolution tryed to build a substitute socialistic finland out of the false imagination that karelian orthodoxian people had somethign common on lutherian finns…they sticked to that too eagerly than trying to affect affairs in actual Finland and where later executed by the Iron man due too nationalistic ideas)
    ….So please, no more Karelia for us…the part we have left is already too much 😀

    So better check things before next time making such wild comments. That sort of mentality isent anymore relevant here in europe

    I do not understand you. So if Russia invade and take Hellsink and then all Finnish people there was kicked out so only Russian people live there.. then it is okay not to want it back??? :confused:

    so you also think Kalingrad shuld not go back to Germany or Lithuania?/

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2520280
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    Without going through any reasons like waziristan….its understandable for you to say this…. 😉

    i am happy you agree. Pakistan benefit very heavily from China. Pakistan use to have difficult time with developing engineers.. but with China help, China can teach Pakistan how to make airplanes like K-8 and FC-1. Very advance Pakistan has moved in 20 years.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2520284
    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    What makes you think that China would be willing to pay the immense costs of restarting production for either the Tu-160 or Tu-22M3?

    There is nothing sensitive about the technology of the Tu-160, and Russia probably wouldn’t even be deterred by international criticism for weapons proliferation.

    In reality, the Tu-160 was never fully developed as a modern, multi-role conventional bomber. Most of the avionics and systems are long out of production and obsolete. The operating costs of the Tu-160 are also staggering. You really have to wonder if Russia’s own Tu-160 bomber force is an effective combat element or a partially derelict status symbol?

    If China was willing to invest the equivilent of tens of billions of dollars/euros into a manned bomber, it might be more desirable to start with a clean sheet of paper than with the Tu-160.

    i see what you mean. used Tu-22m3 is not only good option but only option. i think it is good enough to defend Nansha from Vietnamese and Philipinio

    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    u cannot sell FC-1 to Ukraine. and if Ukraine joins Nato than all military cooperation is cuttoff to PRC.

    yeah they can do. if Ukraine join NATO, do you think they will only buy American or France aircraft? no, they will want to keep theyre aviation industry but try to make it western conformed like An-70 with western equipment. Partnership with China can maintain aviation industry and save money by doing joint progject. Many Chinese airplane now have some western stuff and is based on western design. FC-1 you see, can be use with western radar like Pakistan want. it is easy to make it nato capatomble

    AdmarilZhengHe
    Participant

    hmm but the FC-1 Block X could only go so far as replacing the MiG-29s. Maybe something more – like a J-10 Block X or a J-XX but jointly developed with Ukraine. The other two would be more than glad to have Ukraine on board given its immense expertise and industrial capacity for making engines. And whats a fighter jet but an engine with wings?

    PS: those italian girls look hot in that picture and so does the ukrainian politician 😉 good looks, power and money make a powerful blend of persuasion :dev2:

    for peace time, FC-1 will be more practicle because it is cheaper to operate. It is like Gripen!

    but no i was thinking cooperation on this one here
    http://www.janes.com/defence/air_forces/news/jdw/jdw021210_2_p.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 112 total)