I heard they will start production of the Lasta 95 basic prop trainer soon.

Albanian Mig-15’s were retired? I think the F-6’s were after that accident last year, but the Mig-15’s still fly.

How can destroying mock ups and decoys be considered as propaganda claims. The decoys altered the BDA figures. In some cases UAVs caught damaged AFVs being removed on low-loaders.

I am not refering to claims made by Nato DURING the conflict (inflated numbers during the conflict would have been expected due to decoys, etc). Howver, Nato clung to its inflated claims well after the conflict.

Nato even hired people to write propaganda to “debunk Serb propaganda”, for example this article written a year after still claiming that they killed 93 tanks.
http://www.afa.org/magazine/June2000/0600kosovo.asp

Here’s another one: http://www.afa.org/magazine/June2000/0600kosovo.asp

In any case the Yugoslavs declared the following after returning to the Vienna Document and Dayton Accords in October 1999.

The Yugoslavs admitted to losing the following after rejoining the accords in 1999 post conflict:

18 (eighteen) MBT

136 (one hundred and thirty six) AFV

50 (fifty) fixed wing combat aircraft.
(This included the 11 MiG-29s lost to all causes. The MiG-21 fleet suffered the worst loss by type)

11 (eleven) combat helicopters

The bulk of these losses were non-operational equipment which was intentionally placed as decoys.

The Serbian MoD does not claim that a Mig-29 shot down the F-117 nor does it claim that 38 aircraft were shot down. I don’t know where you are getting that? Nato’s the one who is making ridiculous claims: 93 tanks killed, 100’s of APC’s, thousands of soldiers, etc.

In fact, here is the image of the guy who shot down the F-117 posing with the weapon he used.

It is known with 100% certainty that the F-117 was shot down with a (modified) SA-3. An old 60’s era radar that could detect stealth (due to its decimetric wavelength) was used to triangulate the F-117’s position and a SA-3 was fired ballistically into where the F-117 was thought to be, then the SA-3 was guided to the target via a thermal imaging camera that had been integrated onto it. Then the Nato planners randomized the flight paths and this strategy was no longer effective.

It is known that no Mig-29 in Allied Force ever fired a single missile.

Also I believe the one Mig-29 didn’t crash, but was shot down by a SA-6 because of faulty identification equipment identifying it as an enemy.

I think by “3rd world” he meant “small” country.

3rd world really means a poor country.

Well it was a good try but this thread has now become just another opportunity to bash the U.S. by those who seem less than rational.

Sauron

Why do YOU care if someone bashes the US? You’re Canadian.