Broken Britain.. You went soft on discipline!.. You went soft on immigration! Parents were told.. ‘No you can’t smack the kids’….Teachers were prevented from chastising kids in schools.. The police couldn’t clip a troublemaker round the ear.. Kids had rights blah blah blah.. Well done Britain..You shall reap what you sowed.. We have lost a whole generation!!
Couldn’t agree more. The nanny state and all its supporters need to take a serious look at what their softy approach has accomplished. Just like all the Somalians that were saved – they are all old enough to handle an AK… and do!
Broken Britain.. You went soft on discipline!.. You went soft on immigration! Parents were told.. ‘No you can’t smack the kids’….Teachers were prevented from chastising kids in schools.. The police couldn’t clip a troublemaker round the ear.. Kids had rights blah blah blah.. Well done Britain..You shall reap what you sowed.. We have lost a whole generation!!
Couldn’t agree more. The nanny state and all its supporters need to take a serious look at what their softy approach has accomplished. Just like all the Somalians that were saved – they are all old enough to handle an AK… and do!
Any Armstrong Whitworth turrets around from an Oxford?
I guess you are right Propstrike. That then disqualifies any strike or ground attack aircraft being shot at as ‘not a combat’ aircraft. 🙁 LOL And of course all other so called conflicts didn’t bring out the worst in people.
Armed Rhodesian Provosts have a very active combat history.
Awesome, I thought it was for real too! Well done.
I love these aeroplanes. Such good looking aircraft.
I feel they have been neglected (or maybe, overlooked?) by the warbird community
How about painting it up in genuine warbird colours as flown in combat by the Rhodesians?
They would be unwise to avoid an engine strip. 🙁 I somehow don’t think they will get away with that one.
Very sad, especially following an act of courtesy like this.
You think this has been done without help from either Russians or the westerners? Money can buy a lot of things – including discreet but expert talent. You only need to look at the latest Chinese fighters to see they are not entirely designed by ‘indigini’.
There must be a Historian somewhere in Kenya or Africa with more pictures. I can’t imagine they don’t exist. Have you tried avcom – that seems to be a pretty busy site for enthusiasts?
Well done mes Amis. To take on such a complex multi-engine design is a real achievement… and it actually flies too. I am so looking forward to seeing it and I’ll bet it’s very photogenic in the air with spinners, retracted gear and big propeller discs.
Would I fly in it? Probably not unless it was Nigel Lamb, Brian Lecomber or Mark Jeffries working the controls! 😉
Can we not just enjoy hamham500’s trial lesson and celebrate such a wonderful way to start flying. What’s all this nonsense about picking the shut down to pieces and why is it that some folk just pour cold water on people’s aviation experiences UKAVIATOR?
If you can’t find something nice to say – go elsewhere.
nine made, 220hp Franklin engine, +8 – 8g. Acrostar came together in 1969 from a Swiss design by Arnold Wagner. The Swiss wouldn’t certify it so Wagner took it to Germany. Wagner sold his KZ-8 to pay for the new aircraft. First flight was April 16 1970. Wing was symmetrical, had do incidence or dihedral and the all moving elevator was linked to the flaps, which in turn were linked to the ailerons. The Acrostar promptly took the Swiss Aerobatic Championships in 1970. It was flown by Wagner and Josef Hoessl and won first and second place. It was then flown to Hullavington for the World Championships, coming in fourth. Wagner then retired from aerobatics and became completely involved in certifying the aeroplane. The fuel crisis in 1974 and failure of Franklin engine company halted plans for a Mk3 version.
In 1971 the Swiss national aerobatic team was founded and selected the Acrostar to be flown by architect Eric Muller. Muller invented the ‘Spiralling Tower’ manoeuvre with his Acrostar in ’74. Christian Schweizer came to the fore using this aircraft and went on to win many Swiss and European competitions. Schweizer considered it one of the best aerobatic aircraft he had ever flown. Source: Flight Fantastic
Then there’s always the advertisers. They are vital and it’s the business jet chaps that spend in this department so they expect coverage as well as a representative readership profile. I liked all the flying magazines and still do although I never read Loop. I read F1 magazine, not because I’m a formula one fan but because the magazine is fun and really interesting to read. Our flying mags are good but they are not that imaginative with their articles. I buy US Flying magazine on the strength of their columnists, specially Peter Garrison, Martha Lunken and Les Abend. Their photography is also improving.
I subscribe to FlyPast and buy AirForces Monthly, The Aeroplane and occasionally Airliner World and Today’s Pilot. I hope Dave Unwin takes his high standards of photography across to PILOT and that Phil Whiteman gets creative with his editorial direction.
Thanks Guys – that is very interesting. I suppose I could have worded it better and asked: ‘are there any air forces still using WWII aircraft operationally and not dedicated to museum activities?’
Specifically; C-47/C-47 turbines, Harvards and even Beech 18s or others? 😉