dark light

Moreorless

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 74 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #294823
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Broken Britain.. You went soft on discipline!.. You went soft on immigration! Parents were told.. ‘No you can’t smack the kids’….Teachers were prevented from chastising kids in schools.. The police couldn’t clip a troublemaker round the ear.. Kids had rights blah blah blah.. Well done Britain..You shall reap what you sowed.. We have lost a whole generation!!

    Couldn’t agree more. The nanny state and all its supporters need to take a serious look at what their softy approach has accomplished. Just like all the Somalians that were saved – they are all old enough to handle an AK… and do!

    in reply to: Tottenham Riots #1841930
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Broken Britain.. You went soft on discipline!.. You went soft on immigration! Parents were told.. ‘No you can’t smack the kids’….Teachers were prevented from chastising kids in schools.. The police couldn’t clip a troublemaker round the ear.. Kids had rights blah blah blah.. Well done Britain..You shall reap what you sowed.. We have lost a whole generation!!

    Couldn’t agree more. The nanny state and all its supporters need to take a serious look at what their softy approach has accomplished. Just like all the Somalians that were saved – they are all old enough to handle an AK… and do!

    in reply to: Surviving Gun Turrets #1052302
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Any Armstrong Whitworth turrets around from an Oxford?

    in reply to: For Percival Provost Experts #1070361
    Moreorless
    Participant

    I guess you are right Propstrike. That then disqualifies any strike or ground attack aircraft being shot at as ‘not a combat’ aircraft. 🙁 LOL And of course all other so called conflicts didn’t bring out the worst in people.

    Armed Rhodesian Provosts have a very active combat history.

    in reply to: B-26 'Flak Bait' back in the air #1070797
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Awesome, I thought it was for real too! Well done.

    in reply to: For Percival Provost Experts #1070806
    Moreorless
    Participant

    I love these aeroplanes. Such good looking aircraft.

    I feel they have been neglected (or maybe, overlooked?) by the warbird community

    How about painting it up in genuine warbird colours as flown in combat by the Rhodesians?

    Moreorless
    Participant

    They would be unwise to avoid an engine strip. 🙁 I somehow don’t think they will get away with that one.

    Very sad, especially following an act of courtesy like this.

    in reply to: Chinese Aircraft Carrier: Moscow Perspective #2003949
    Moreorless
    Participant

    You think this has been done without help from either Russians or the westerners? Money can buy a lot of things – including discreet but expert talent. You only need to look at the latest Chinese fighters to see they are not entirely designed by ‘indigini’.

    in reply to: Piper Aircraft Corp PA 22-135 Light Bomber #1058430
    Moreorless
    Participant

    There must be a Historian somewhere in Kenya or Africa with more pictures. I can’t imagine they don’t exist. Have you tried avcom – that seems to be a pretty busy site for enthusiasts?

    in reply to: Mosquito replica – Airborne! #1066027
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Well done mes Amis. To take on such a complex multi-engine design is a real achievement… and it actually flies too. I am so looking forward to seeing it and I’ll bet it’s very photogenic in the air with spinners, retracted gear and big propeller discs.

    Would I fly in it? Probably not unless it was Nigel Lamb, Brian Lecomber or Mark Jeffries working the controls! 😉

    in reply to: PA-28 Landing at East Midlands Airport #414577
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Can we not just enjoy hamham500’s trial lesson and celebrate such a wonderful way to start flying. What’s all this nonsense about picking the shut down to pieces and why is it that some folk just pour cold water on people’s aviation experiences UKAVIATOR?

    If you can’t find something nice to say – go elsewhere.

    in reply to: Is this what I think it is ? #415650
    Moreorless
    Participant

    nine made, 220hp Franklin engine, +8 – 8g. Acrostar came together in 1969 from a Swiss design by Arnold Wagner. The Swiss wouldn’t certify it so Wagner took it to Germany. Wagner sold his KZ-8 to pay for the new aircraft. First flight was April 16 1970. Wing was symmetrical, had do incidence or dihedral and the all moving elevator was linked to the flaps, which in turn were linked to the ailerons. The Acrostar promptly took the Swiss Aerobatic Championships in 1970. It was flown by Wagner and Josef Hoessl and won first and second place. It was then flown to Hullavington for the World Championships, coming in fourth. Wagner then retired from aerobatics and became completely involved in certifying the aeroplane. The fuel crisis in 1974 and failure of Franklin engine company halted plans for a Mk3 version.

    In 1971 the Swiss national aerobatic team was founded and selected the Acrostar to be flown by architect Eric Muller. Muller invented the ‘Spiralling Tower’ manoeuvre with his Acrostar in ’74. Christian Schweizer came to the fore using this aircraft and went on to win many Swiss and European competitions. Schweizer considered it one of the best aerobatic aircraft he had ever flown. Source: Flight Fantastic

    in reply to: Today's Pilot is yesterday's news (merger with Pilot) #416084
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Then there’s always the advertisers. They are vital and it’s the business jet chaps that spend in this department so they expect coverage as well as a representative readership profile. I liked all the flying magazines and still do although I never read Loop. I read F1 magazine, not because I’m a formula one fan but because the magazine is fun and really interesting to read. Our flying mags are good but they are not that imaginative with their articles. I buy US Flying magazine on the strength of their columnists, specially Peter Garrison, Martha Lunken and Les Abend. Their photography is also improving.

    in reply to: Today's Pilot is yesterday's news (merger with Pilot) #416248
    Moreorless
    Participant

    I subscribe to FlyPast and buy AirForces Monthly, The Aeroplane and occasionally Airliner World and Today’s Pilot. I hope Dave Unwin takes his high standards of photography across to PILOT and that Phil Whiteman gets creative with his editorial direction.

    in reply to: How many air forces still use WWII aircraft? #1152605
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Thanks Guys – that is very interesting. I suppose I could have worded it better and asked: ‘are there any air forces still using WWII aircraft operationally and not dedicated to museum activities?’

    Specifically; C-47/C-47 turbines, Harvards and even Beech 18s or others? 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 74 total)