dark light

Moreorless

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 74 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: German WWII test: DB605-Spit vs. 109G #1098778
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Remember there was also an issue with aviation fuel. The Germans had only limited access to high octane fuels, a fact which continually hampered Daimler Benz’s 605 development.

    in reply to: Cessna 172 book #416490
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Any idea why Cessna entered into an agreement with Reims in the first place? I know they had equity in Reims Aviation but surely it would have been more cost-effective to export into Europe. It would be interesting to know what the various trade tariffs were for US products compared to French-made items.

    in reply to: Cessna 172 book #416599
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Does it mention the Reims variants? I have always wondered if Cessna sent out kits for assembly to Reims aviation like wings and fuselages etc. How much of the airframe did Reims actually produce in house as I understand they were better built than Cessna factory versions. Is that true?

    in reply to: Last flight into preservation of DC-6 ZS-MUL #1115011
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Apologies – you are right. I was watching the wrong video. Definitely one and four shut down with four feathered after the landing roll completed. Both re-started for final taxi.

    Magnificent!

    in reply to: Last flight into preservation of DC-6 ZS-MUL #1115444
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Under no circumstances would they shut down any engines until the landing roll has been completed in this case. The video is low quality so it appears as if the propellers are stopped when they are in fact still turning. Remember that on a DC-6, it’s the flight engineer’s job to lift the reverse gate, watch for the lights and bring the throttles back once its confirmed they all work. The Six would, in this case have taxied to its final resting place with all four turning. The pilots were also pretty experienced. One of them did the initial type ratings for the Red Bull pilots.

    in reply to: Last flight into preservation of DC-6 ZS-MUL #1115781
    Moreorless
    Participant

    This seems to be an abusive way to treat this airplane.
    If you noticed, he kept the props in reverse too long, causing the dirt to
    snuff out engines # 1 and 4…dirt obviously got sucked into all 4 engines
    which will cause damage, not to mention the damage to the flaps and other
    parts of the plane.
    It looked to me like he had enough runway left (and uphill) to stop in time without being so aggressive.

    Nice one Tim K :rolleyes:! But try to understand this aeroplane has spent its last money earning years in and out of dirt strips being abused one way or another; I read they managed to save the aircraft from having its wings and tail chopped off to move it to its present location. I also read the DC-6 was near dereliction when they started work on it. The runway was only 850 metres and 900 was needed according to the book. If I were the pilot I would also drop it on as early as possible. None of the engines stopped either. They all continued to run – just a low quality video.

    in reply to: Museo del Aire-Madrid #529522
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Thanks Roberto – lovely to see images from Madrid. Pleeese make them smaller though. They need re-sizing.

    in reply to: Western France #530831
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Fantastique Avion Ancien! Please post any more that you have. I have never seen the Caudron biplane before or knew there were two Flamants flying.

    Lovely and thanks for putting them up.

    in reply to: Was Aeroplane – Is now Forums and Facebook groups? #1089386
    Moreorless
    Participant

    I enjoy both magazines. Aeroplane is perhaps nicer to read and Flypast would be the one I would drop because of its reducing coverage of aircraft restoration stuff and scant international news. It has Too much BoB, Spit, Lanc, Hurricane and Bf109 coverage.

    The thing is that the magazine business has changed. It’s no longer the realm of traditional publishing houses and their staff hierarchies established when print first arrived. We now have computers and the internet and vastly different ways of disseminating information as well as multiple ways of reading it. We have instant access to museums across the world via the web. The magazine industry doesn’t really know which way to turn yet and few UK aviation publications have embraced social media because they don’t see clear revenue streams or it’s too ‘new fangled’. What’s more, Editors need to have a handle on the business of magazines just as they need to have a passion for their topic. The publishers also need to take another look at the way they handle their editors and to understand this is not a growth period without unusual business skills. It is very unusual to see editors ‘demote’ themselves like Alan Warnes and Ken Ellis. I perceive these two extremely talented gentlemen are being worked too hard. Perhaps Mick Oakey too. None of them have the time to even respond to the occasional email – a bad sign.

    Key’s titles are beautifully produced but losing two good editors is a concern. Likewise The Aeroplane, although Kelsey need to be wary of alienating its readers by changing the ‘look’ of a magazine. The Aeroplane has a successful ‘look’ and it might be best to stay with it rather than change just for the sake of it – a common mistake in the magazine industry.

    in reply to: Was Aeroplane – Is now Forums and Facebook groups? #1090313
    Moreorless
    Participant

    I believe the editor’s position at any of these magazines is extremely high pressure – Air Forces Monthly must be the most difficult to run. It’s an incessant routine that probably destroys family life and has these chaps withdrawing from their industry to get away from the attention. There’s also a great deal of pressure from reduced retail copy sales with the tough economy and I would imagine it having a big effect on circulation, which is how editors tend to measure themselves. These fellows need a deserved break every few years.

    I subscribe to Aeroplane and Fly Past and sometimes a magazine needs to take a fresh approach to its content.

    in reply to: Beagle 206 Srs 3; worth saving? #417754
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Well I haven’t touched the thread and in fact I tried deleting it as there was little interest shown. Now it has popped up with my original deleted thread in the GA section. I guess there are those in the back room who only consider warbirds part of our heritage.

    I have managed to trace the current owner although I haven’t spoken to him yet. However, I’ve now lost interest in the subject and won’t attempt to delete it again as someone amongst the mods seems to have taken control of the thread. Stuff it.

    in reply to: South African Sqn Identity? #1121402
    Moreorless
    Participant

    why don’t you try http://www.avcom.co.za

    They seem to have a busy forum down there with lots of air force stuff.

    in reply to: Flypast Beagle B206 #418238
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Anyone tell us what this is – apparently still active in Brasil?

    in reply to: R110 000 /$16 000 for a Tomahawk #418633
    Moreorless
    Participant

    Tomahawk wing life limit is 11,000 hours. 😉

    Rockwell Commander range (112 and 114s) also has a wing life limit, which varies between models.

    Moreorless
    Participant

    It’s obvioush no one really nowse much here.

    I am willing to make a big sacrifice and volunteer for the job of evaluating each one and writing up a fullsh report on each. Hic.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 74 total)