Not sure why the waste of bandwidth on a purely hypothetical scenario. Why would the US or “West” ever be in a position where they would copy, steal or license produce their own version of the Flanker? Under what circumstances would this ever occur? National pride and given the fact that the Flanker was an “enemy” aircraft made this a complete impossibility of ever happening.
As already discussed, the “West” already operate a Flanker “sized” aircraft in significant numbers. Pointless discussion.
In practice the Flanker family has shot down some MiGs, dropped free fall bombs, and dozens of guided missiles. In the entire history of the program.
You can hardly blame the aircraft for that. Using the same logic, what has the F-22 achieved in practice? I mean, what do you expect? The US and Russia to get involved in wars to test out their kit and demonstrate their effectiveness….oh wait…
Nose landing gear is now single wheel and looks flimsy compared with the previous twin wheel gear, probably done to lower weight and offset the rest of the weight increase, although I would have thought the extra weight would need a twin wheel nose gear.
An interesting insight into the CH-5 drone.
How is such a fighter going to fare against any further potential aggression by the Russians? It is safe to assume that Ukraine/Russian relations will be latently hostile for the foreseeable future, and with the absence of Russian-derived hardware, the Ukrainian armed forces will be under severe pressure to present any meaningful deterrent. As far as I can see, Ukraine has nothing to lose now by jumping into bed with NATO and seeking significant military assistance to recapitalise its inventory with advanced Western (i.e. US) equipment.
reminds me a lot of the MiG-21UB with side intakes in place of the original intake..the design heritage really comes through.
A MiG-21UB with lateral intakes already exists in the form of the FTC-2000 and the naval variant FTC-2000G.

The JF-17 on the other hand is based on the MiG-33 LFI concept dating back to the 80s, modified with lateral intakes and extended LERX.

sigh. It has already entered production and the first squadron of Tejas is to be formed by July. the IAF will receive its second series production fighter before that..SP2 having already flown.
But it still won’t be operational when only two aircraft will be inducted into the first squadron. These will still be used for ‘testing’ purposes, and not operational duties such as CAP missions. It seems the first IAF Tejas squadron will be a ‘testing and evaluation squadron’, so to speak. The deadline for operational clearance if the end of this year, but as with previous deadlines….
India will get its Tejas fighter squadron — indigenously built Combat Aircraft — on July 1, with two planes. The squadron will be based in in Tamil Nadu’s Sulur.
Another two fighters are expected in the next financial year, 2016-17, a senior Air Force commander told NDTV. The total strength of the squadron – normally they have 14 to 16 aircraft — and its name will be decided later.
The first two Tejas fighters, however, won’t be used for operations now. They will undergo test flights to resolve certain flaws. The clearance for operations is expected in December.
The Tejas still has 19 unresolved issues – including nose wheel vibrations, high noise level in the cockpit — which need to be sorted out. “The HAL (the manufacturer, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited) and IAF are working closely to sort out these issues, we expect them to go through it quickly,” the commander said.
I guess this is one of the first pictures of an aircraft firing rockets!
Quite dangerous with all that wood and canvas construction. Brave pilot.
Imperial Japan
Luftwaffe
North Korean
North Vietnamese
Iraqi
Serbian
In that order.
Is it the same type that recently sank due to fire?
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/naval-boat-sinks-off-chennai-coast-due-to-fire-no-casualties-1268458
New Delhi: A small boat used by the Navy for harbor security sank off Chennai coast after it caught fire on Wednesday evening.
The Fast Interceptor Boat T-304, along with two similar boats, had sailed out on Wednesday evening when it suddenly caught fire. All six sailors on board were rescued by the other two boats.
The incident happened about 90 nautical miles north east of Chennai, navy sources said.
An official release said a fire broke out on board the 15.6 metre-long interceptor craft while it was on routine deployment at about 2 AM.
“The fire caused extensive damage to the Fibre-glass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) hull of the craft resulting in sinking of the boat despite all out efforts by the crew to save it. There were no casualties,” it said.
An inquiry has been ordered to investigate the incident, it said.
The boat, made out of fibre reinforced plastic, melted completely in the incident. It was inducted in 2013, and was one of the 67 such boats imported from Sri Lanka for the Sagar Prahari Bal, a naval police force created after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack.
These boats are 16 feet long, four feet wide and weigh 15 tons. They are manned by four to six sailors and do not have officers on board.
There are also no fixed gun mounts on them and carry machine guns.
It seems the Russians may have already paid the price for Putin’s entry in the Syrian conflict with the recent airliner crash in Egypt, seems too much of a coincidence to me. If that does turn out to be true, how soon before we see Tu-95s carpet bombing ISIS territory and Spetznaz mopping up the rest?
Is it just me or does the landing gear on the PAK FA suggest that there are carrier ops in mind? It looks quite beefy to me.
Number 1 squadron flew the FT-5 (Chinese JJ-5 trainer) between 1975 and 2012 as a trainer. In 1987 they were assigned a wartime role with AIM-9 Sidewinders.
Anyone have photos of PAF FT-5 armed with Sidewinders?
I believe they used 400 L drop tanks? What is their internal fuel load?
I stumbled across this recently. It might be worth checking out some of Peter Steinman’s photographic work, he’s spent a lot of time with the PAF since the late 70s and 80s.

It doesn’t take much to realise that a 12-0 victory of the MKI against the Tiffy is highly unlikely. We don’t know what the RoE were in such a scenario, and whether the RAF was severely handicapped to favour the MKI’s strengths. What this story suggests is that a fighter designed for a specific purpose is utterly and completely useless against the very type of fighter it was meant to counter?! That would mean our entire air defence strategy during the cold war has been completely wrong and that those QRA flights in the North Sea are utterly futile?! And if in the highly unlikely event this were true, does that mean the MKI would trounce the Rafale’s the IAF is so keen on getting?! Complete b0ll0cks. In most cases such as this, there is usually a fairly well balanced outcome, one side may prevail under some conditions, the other side in other conditions.
i dont see the sense in this, the HJT-36 is a lemon and a decade to late, why cant India just admit that the project is a failure, cancel the whole thing and buy new aircraft off the shelf? (M-345, PC-21, L-39NG or more BAe Hawk AJT’s)
Probably because of the same reasons why the LCA is still in development. If you applied the same logic to the LCA, it should have been scrapped years ago given how late it is.